Proceeding contribution from Charles Clarke (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 6 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
The hon. Gentleman is right to say that we are widening the sources that might provoke an intervention. That is because, for the sake of argument, something such as the Bichard review of the tragedies at Soham and what happened thereafter is not a ““negative inspection report””, but a serious examination, which it would be quite appropriate for the Home Secretary of the day to take into account. That is why it is right to widen the basis of impulses that cause the Home Secretary of the day, at whatever time, to be able to look at what is happening. It is widening, as the hon. Gentleman says, but for good reason.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 443 c616
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Criminal proceedings Accountability Crime Arrests Aviation Anti-social behaviour Extradition Inspections Immigration Greater London Information Local government Police Powers Prisons Police custody Mergers Passengers Police authorities Police community support officers Police cautions Standards Surveillance Training Young people Young offenders Transport Social rented housing Shipping Truancy USA Anti-social behaviour orders Parenting contracts Parenting orders Crime and disorder reduction partnerships
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 16:48:37 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305160
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305160
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305160