Skip to main content

1-20 of 107 results for legtitle:"Companies Act 2006"

Subject X
Misconduct

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Misconduct (107)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business and Trade Committee
Date
14 April 2026
House
House of Commons

Lords committee stage first day. Clause 1, as amended, agreed to. Clause 2 disagreed to. Clause 3 agreed to. Clause 4 disagreed to. New clause agreed to. Clause 5 agreed to. Clauses 6 and 7, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 8 to 35 agreed to. Clause 36 disagreed to. New...

Lead member
Lord Johnson of Lainston
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Coaker; Baroness Blake of Leeds
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Notes
Scottish, Welsh, and Northern Ireland legislative consent sought.
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 cc1-56GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

1: Clause 1, page 2, line 2, leave out from “that” to end of line 3 and insert “information contained in the register is accurate and that the register contains everything it ought to contain.”

Member’s explanatory statement

Objective 2 currently focuses on the accuracy and completeness of...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 c1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I draw the Committee’s attention to my interests as set out in the register, including as a director and person with significant control of AMP Ventures Ltd and as a person with significant control and shareholder of several other companies. I do not believe that any of these...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 cc1-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I again welcome this Bill, as I set out at Second Reading. My noble friend is right: it has all-party support and is sorely needed. Likewise, it is reassuring to see the large number of amendments tabled by the Government, reflecting, no doubt, the views that your Lordships...

Member
Lord Leigh of Hurley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 cc2-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have tabled Amendment 63 to Clause 90. I refer to my interests as set out in the register. I am a director of several companies and a person with significant control of an LLP, so I have had a lot of interaction with Companies House over the...

Member
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 cc4-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Johnson, for his introduction today, and I acknowledge the work of the noble Lord, Lord Callanan, on the previous Bill and in the run-up to today. I am very sorry that my noble friend Lord Fox is unable to be here to...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 cc5-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking the Minister and his colleagues for their approach to the Bill and for his remarks at the beginning, which were very welcome. We all have an interest in trying to ensure that the Bill works, so I thank the Minister for his comments about...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 cc6-8GC
House
House of Lords

I had not intended to speak on this group, but my noble friend Lord Coaker has drawn my attention to the active verbs in the subsections of Clause 1. I am at a loss to understand why they are used. Why is objective 3

“to minimise the risk of records kept...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 c8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Agnew. I declare my interest as chairman of C Hoare and Co. I apologise for not being here at Second Reading. I had a good excuse: a very bad dose of flu.

I have two brief points....

Member
Lord Macpherson of Earl's Court (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 c8GC
House
House of Lords

I really thank noble Lords for their contributions. Not for the first time in this House I am surrounded by people who know far more than I do about the subject, with business gurus such as my noble friend Lord Leigh, who gave us the benefit of his many decades...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 cc8-10GC
House
House of Lords

I just interrupt the Minister before he goes much further. I have been listening very carefully to what he has to say, but he seemed to imply that a risk-based approach could lead to box-ticking. Surely, a risk-based approach is the very antithesis of box-ticking.

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 c10GC
House
House of Lords

I appreciate that intervention. Our view is that if we legislate specifically for a risk-based approach, on top of what we believe is already a risk-based approach, we are not achieving our goals. The concern from the Government’s point of view—and mine, as someone who has registered companies with Companies...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 cc10-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if my noble friend wants my amendment not to be moved, would it be possible for the registrar to write to us to explain her philosophy and how she is going to make this huge change to delivering a risk-based approach? I am very reassured by his comments,...

Member
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 c11GC
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for that comment, and I entirely agree that it would be extremely useful to have such a letter from the registrar. I take very seriously the comments about a cultural change at Companies House. We should be aware of where we are coming from. Not...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 c11GC
House
House of Lords

I would be grateful for a clarification. Can the Minister say something about the language being used? My noble friend Lord Browne

also picked up on this point. It is not that it is wrong, but why in Clause 1 do objectives 3 and 4, for example, talk about minimising...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 c11GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his comments. I do not want noble Lords at any point to think that I am being defensive in any way, as we are having a collaborative debate around the objectives of trying to improve company law and registration of companies and the integrity...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 c12GC
House
House of Lords

I do not want to prolong this debate because, although it is fascinating, it is something that can be dealt with in the period between now and Report. Perhaps my noble friend could, with his officials, run through the dictionary to find a slightly punchier verb. We all know what...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 cc12-3GC
House
House of Lords

So that the Minister does not have to answer questions seriatim, as it were, I endorse that. I am not sure that I have heard persuasive objections to the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Coaker. I understand what he says about risk-based, but sharing information with relevant public...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 c13GC
House
House of Lords

I appreciate my noble friend’s comments. I do not believe that I suggested at any point that this was not baked into the cake of what Companies House is expected to deliver. I would be delighted to have further dialogue with Members around this but, in my humble opinion, the...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2023
Reference
829 c13GC
House
House of Lords