Skip to main content

1-100 of 589 results for subject:Schools

Legislation X
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12 (589)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
1 May 2012
Reference
CHAP 9 2012

Protection of Freedoms Bill. Programme motion (No. 4) on consideration of Lords amendments agreed to on question. Lords amendments considered. Lords amendments agreed to, some as amended. Other Lords amendments disagreed to. Committee appointed to draw up Reasons to be assigned to the Lords for disagreeing to certain of their...

Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c526-88
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment (b) to Lords amendment 51.

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c537
House
House of Commons

The need for legislation to create a distinctive offence of stalking has been clear for some time. I therefore start the debate by welcoming the Government's willingness to respond to these calls for such legislation. Our amendments reflect the need to ensure that this opportunity for progress is not missed...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c537-8
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is making a powerful point about Scotland. Scotland moved straight from ““breach of the peace”” legislation to legislation on stalking, so the comparison is quite dramatic. We in England and Wales are in a slightly better position, but the comparison is nevertheless invidious, which is why the...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c538
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to this short debate. Lords amendments 16 and 17 were supported in another place by Lord Selsdon. I welcome the debate about powers of entry and look forward to the Minister's response to the points that I will put to him. When...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c530
House
House of Commons

Is there a timetable for the conclusion of the review of previous powers? It would be helpful to know, before we pass any further legislation, what the result of the review entailed.

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c529
House
House of Commons

If the right hon. Gentleman refers to the Bill, he will see that the time period contemplated is two years, in order to allow proper consideration of all the relevant 1,300 to 1,400 powers of entry. This is not something that will simply lie in abeyance. The review of all...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c529
House
House of Commons

What ultimate sanctions are in place in the event that the two-year review is not completed by any Department?

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c529
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Lady will be aware, the provisions relate to the consent of the parents. They say that the consent of one parent is required, but it is left open to the other parent to object, and such an objection would stand. If need be, in the light of...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c562-3
House
House of Commons

I welcome the amendment, but does the Secretary of State agree that the public's severe lack of confidence in the criminal justice system's ability to deal with stalking is a major problem, and that legislation, while welcome, is not the whole solution? We also need training for officers; that is...

Member
Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c544
House
House of Commons

That is an important point. We have seen how long it has taken the police to treat domestic violence as seriously as it should be treated. The Home Secretary's comments show that victims are sometimes told that it is nice to receive that sort of attention. There is also the...

Member
Mark Tami (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c545
House
House of Commons

Of course, what we want is for the issue to be addressed properly earlier; we want victims to have the confidence to come forward, knowing that what they say will be taken seriously, so that the matter can be dealt with properly before it gets to the point of physical...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c545
House
House of Commons

I am happy to tell the hon. Lady that we will indeed keep the legislation under review. The last thing we want to do is to find that the legislation is being misinterpreted. The reason it is set out in the terms, ““The following are examples,”” is precisely to send...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c547
House
House of Commons

I have been following the right hon. Gentleman's argument with some interest. Would it not be more consistent with his argument about prevention if everyone's details were put on a DNA database—not that I am recommending such a course of action?

Member
Jonathan Edwards (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c568
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 16.

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c527
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Gentleman give the Government just a little leeway, after only two years, in untangling the giant pile of messy powers of entry that his Government left the coalition?

Member
Steve Baker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c531
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has walked directly into my fist. ““Modern Conservatism: Our Quality of Life Agenda”” stated:"““When he became Prime Minister, Gordon Brown pledged to introduce a new liberty test to curtail powers of entry…He commissioned Lord West to undertake a review of entry powers. A final report by Lord...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c531
House
House of Commons

The review is a specific statutory requirement, and we are focused on ensuring that it is undertaken with all due expedition. The right hon. Gentleman will be aware of the requirements of the ministerial code and other requirements on Departments and Ministers to abide by the law. In addition, the...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c529-30
House
House of Commons

The amendments would provide that powers of entry may be exercised only with the agreement of the occupier of the premises in question or on the authority of a warrant, unless the authority using the power"““can demonstrate that the aim of the use of the power would be frustrated if...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c527-8
House
House of Commons

Does the Home Office have any statistics on the number of times that police officers have entered using the powers that they already have?

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c528
House
House of Commons

What I can point the right hon. Gentleman to is the published list of the various powers of entry that we analysed, as it indicates that the total number of powers for all agencies is between about 1,300 and 1,400. That is obviously quite a significant number, hence the reason...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c528-9
House
House of Commons

I accept some of what the right hon. Gentleman has said, but he should be very careful about the language that he uses in debates such as this. He should not blindly claim that the retention of DNA would prevent 6,500 further offences, as he did earlier, because that is...

Member
Mike Crockart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c568
House
House of Commons

I venture to disagree. The figures that I gave were Home Office figures produced for the Minister in July 2010. The point that I am making, which I think is valid, is that the retention of DNA could potentially, in a number of cases, prevent repeat offences. That is why...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c568
House
House of Commons

I apologise for missing the earlier part of my right hon. Friend's no doubt excellent speech. Given that his amendment is raising a number of issues, will he respond to the concern that some of us feel about the disproportionate number of black and Asian people whose names and details...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c567
House
House of Commons

I consider the retention of the six-year limit specified by the 2010 Act to be a proportionate response. Certainly issues related to stop-and-search powers and charging need to be investigated in the context of police practice, but the fact remains that the DNA that is being kept under the Act...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c567
House
House of Commons

May I try to help the right hon. Gentleman? The basic principle being advanced is that the retention of DNA prevents further crimes, but I think that what he really means is that it assists in the detection of further crimes. The mere holding of DNA would not have prevented...

Member
Mike Crockart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c567
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that I disagree fundamentally with the hon. Gentleman. Someone might be picked up as a result of the retention of DNA following the commission of one crime, but how many times has the hon. Gentleman seen reports about serial rapists or serial murderers on the television news?...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c568
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister know of any innocent person who has been negatively affected by the placing of his details on a DNA database? This is a question of balance. The Government's main aim appears to be to ensure that the DNA of someone who has not committed a crime is...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c566
House
House of Commons

I hesitate to agree with the hon. Gentleman yet again, but I do agree with him. As far as I am aware, the fact that someone's DNA is on the database under the 2010 Act is known only by the police—if they wish to examine it—and by the person concerned,...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c566
House
House of Commons

Nonsense.

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c567
House
House of Commons

We have had a debate about this and there is an honest disagreement between the Minister and me, but the hon. Gentleman needs to recognise that the DNA database, as constituted under the 2010 Act, would prevent those 6,000 serious crimes from taking place. He may shake his head, but...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c567
House
House of Commons

First, may I apologise for missing the opening speeches in this debate? I imagine, however, that they followed the usual form, with the Minister saying there are real problems with the retention of names on the database and the Opposition saying they ought to be retained because of the possibility...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c570-1
House
House of Commons

We have carefully considered the issue of the balance between the lay magistracy and the more professional judiciary. On the specific issues in question, we judge that because of the likely number of cases and the role required, the current measures are the right ones. However, we will continue to...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c570
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for that assurance, and I certainly hope the situation will be kept under review. District judges are paid members of the magistracy, and I am sure the Minister is not suggesting that there is less professionalism in the quality of judgments of the lay magistracy.

Member
Kate Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c570
House
House of Commons

Yes; my hon. Friend the Member for Kingston upon Hull North (Diana Johnson) has dealt with this matter in Committee and throughout the Bill's passage, and that is the position of the official Opposition. We note the amendments proposed in the other place by the Government, and there has been...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c569-70
House
House of Commons

I wish to raise one specific issue in relation to Lords amendment 3, and I put on the record my interest as a life member of the Magistrates Association. Ministers propose that the possible holding of DNA on the database beyond the period covered by the legislation could be agreed...

Member
Kate Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c570
House
House of Commons

There is a range of views in the House, but what we have been trying to do consistently, both in opposition and in government, is maximise the amount of time for which we can retain DNA within European law, and we believe that six years is an appropriate period. I...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c568-9
House
House of Commons

I assume that the right hon. Gentleman's amendments are carefully drafted and that he intends what they state. Does he agree that the consequence of that change would be as follows: if no parent has consented but neither has actively objected, that would count as consent—in other words, consent would...

Member
Julian Huppert (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c569
House
House of Commons

I will give way to the hon. Lady, and as I have said, I look forward to hearing the Opposition's clarification on the amendment.

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c562
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman makes a good point. We took evidence from several police officers, among whom were several knowledgeable females, who had been training their respective forces. Given that we now have a large number of good senior and junior police officers who are women, it will hopefully be...

Member
Elfyn Llwyd (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c552-3
House
House of Commons

It was put to me earlier today by senior police officers that one reason why the police have got more effective at tackling domestic violence is that more women police officers have come into the force. Did the right hon. Gentleman's inquiry find a link between stalking being treated effectively...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c551
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the right hon. Lady for that assurance, which I take to be an invitation to write to her. I had another seven or eight questions, but I shall not labour the House with them this evening. Before I sit down and allow others to take the...

Member
Elfyn Llwyd (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c553
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman has asked a number of detailed questions, and I will be happy to get back to him in writing. We have had very good consultation and a very good relationship with NAPO and Protection Against Stalking in developing the Bill, and I expect to continue to...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c553
House
House of Commons

We have listened to the debate, but we are still not satisfied on the question of lesser and more serious charges of stalking. We therefore wish to press amendment (b) to a vote. Question put, That amendment (b) to Lords amendment 51 be made. The House divided: Ayes 200, Noes...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c554
House
House of Commons

I will not repeat the constructive comments of the right hon. Member for Dwyfor Meirionnydd (Mr Llwyd) and others on the provisions that all parties have accepted. I am delighted to have been part of the process, but hope that does not give me, as a relatively new Member, a...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c553-4
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c558
House
House of Commons

The amendments relate to the provisions in parts 1 to 4 of the Bill. Some are of a minor and technical nature, but some are of more substance; given the number of amendments in the group, I propose to focus my comments on the more substantive amendments. We are returning...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c558-62
House
House of Commons

Is my right hon. Friend aware that many people are very concerned about the way in which DNA is collected and stored? Clearly, when someone has been reported, questioned and possibly arrested by the police, but then exonerated—with no conviction and in many cases no trial—surely there is no case...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c565-6
House
House of Commons

We did have to make those judgments when we were in government, and our judgment was that the having the envelope of six years was consistent with our European obligations, and also with the pattern of offending. If people had not reoffended within the six years, the likelihood of further...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c566
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that if someone's DNA is held on a database, it does not impinge on their freedoms to go about their daily lawful business, unimpeded in anything they want to do? Does he further agree that people's freedoms are enhanced by having as many murderers,...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c564
House
House of Commons

As the Minister has said, we are indeed traversing old ground that is familiar to me, to him and to his officials. The initial discussion on DNA retention had its genesis in the debates on what became the Crime and Security Act 2010, which was produced during what I shall...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c563-4
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister clarify what would happen if one or both parents have refused permission for biometric data to be taken from their child, but the child wishes to consent? Would the child have the right to have their biometric information taken?

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c562
House
House of Commons

I accept some of what the right hon. Gentleman says, but surely he must recognise that there are shades of grey in this debate. He says that we need to be protected from murderers and rapists, but many law-abiding citizens have concerns about being fitted up by the police or...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c565
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman will know that through Lords amendments, we are seeking to find a mechanism to debate serious issues such as rape and other serious crimes. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 includes rape and a range of associated issues, which we want to debate. The amendment might not have...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c565
House
House of Commons

I want to be clear about what the right hon. Gentleman is saying about this Lords amendment. Does he accept that the amendment would mean that somebody accused and arrested only once for a malicious sexual offence would have their DNA kept for ever—in clear contravention of the European Court's...

Member
Julian Huppert (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c564
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his support on this matter. He has been consistent in his support for the Opposition's proposals and has joined us in Divisions. Deep down, he understands that the Conservative party's legacy as the party of law and order is seriously being put...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c564
House
House of Commons

Let me reassure the hon. Gentleman that I am not trying to turn this into a simplistic debate. As Home Office Ministers, my right hon. Friend the Member for Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle (Alan Johnson) and I wrestled with officials for many months about where to draw the...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c565
House
House of Commons

I have had some opportunity to discuss this issue with ACPO and those representing victims of stalking. Their comments are similar to what victims of domestic violence say to me. If an officer has been trained specifically in the identification of stalking and dealing with a stalking victim, then they,...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c544
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a valid and important point. As I said in response to the hon. Member for Islington North (Jeremy Corbyn), I hope that the creation of the legislation and the offences will, in itself, send out a message, but of course that has to be backed up...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c544-5
House
House of Commons

The Home Secretary will have heard my intervention on my hon. Friend the Member for Walthamstow (Stella Creasy). In the Home Secretary's discussions with the police, have they begun to understand the sensitivity of stalking and that it is very difficult for someone to report it? It is at that...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c544
House
House of Commons

I shall be asking the House to agree with Lords amendment 51. I am pleased and proud to be standing here supporting and speaking to amendments relating to the introduction of new criminal offences for stalking. Some years ago, I secured an Adjournment debate in the House about the tragic...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c543-4
House
House of Commons

How does the Home Secretary think that the public can ensure that the issue is on the agenda for the police and crime commissioners, who are to be elected in November?

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c545
House
House of Commons

Given our shared concern about the inventiveness of perpetrators, will the Home Secretary undertake to review annually the range of behaviours that will be identified through this process so that we can understand whether it is being used as a list of examples or solely as a list of what...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c547
House
House of Commons

From time to time, my right hon. Friend and others raise issues relating to ensuring that matters are on the police and crime commissioners' agendas. Bodies representing victims of stalking will, I am sure, do all that they can to ensure that candidates for the post of police and crime...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c545-7
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for raising that issue. The persistency of an offence is a factor that should be taken into account when looking at the seriousness of it. Perhaps I can attempt to give the hon. Member for Walthamstow some indication on these matters. My hon. Friend raises...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c549
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for her clear exposition of the position. May I seek some clarification on the position regarding persistent offenders, who quite properly should be dealt with in the Crown court? Will guidelines be issued to prosecutors to deal with the particular issue of...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c549
House
House of Commons

It is normal practice when introducing offences to have a lower level and a higher level offence, and training for the criminal justice system agencies will look at identifying the sort of behaviour that might come under one or the other. Again, in these circumstances it is always difficult, and...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c548
House
House of Commons

In which case, will the Home Secretary set out clearly and explicitly what she considers to be a stalking offence that would come under section 2A, rather than section 4A, because I think that there is genuine concern that having two offences but not defining the difference between them will...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c548
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for supporting our approach. It is important that a degree of discretion is available to police officers so that they can identify behaviour that is not listed but would come under the definition of stalking. A number of the comments made by the hon. Member...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c547-8
House
House of Commons

I agree with my right hon. Friend that well-trained police officers will be able to identify exactly what stalking is. From their experience and training, they will be able to say, ““That is an example of stalking and we should do something about it,”” and I hope the legislation will...

Member
Bob Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c547
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right. By its nature, that is the kind of offence that it is, and that is how it ruins people's lives. I have spoken to many victims who say that it is almost like having a black cloud behind them day and night, and they...

Member
Elfyn Llwyd (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c550-1
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman touches on an important point. The danger is that, whatever the penalties may be, these people come out of prison and carry on committing the same offence, because they are obsessive to the point that whatever action is taken against them, they will keep on doing...

Member
Mark Tami (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c550
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the Home Secretary and the hon. Member for Walthamstow (Stella Creasy) in what is a very interesting debate. Some 10 months ago I set up an all-party committee covering both Houses, including Members from all parties and none, by which I mean it included...

Member
Elfyn Llwyd (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c549-50
House
House of Commons

I am concerned that the measure is becoming bureaucratic. We know that when systems are not clear, there is a greater likelihood that people will not follow them properly. Although the Minister may be certain in his own mind that the theoretical operation of the process is justified, is he...

Member
Meg Munn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c579
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment (a) to Lords amendment 30.

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c572
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is making a powerful speech, much of which I agree with. On her point about a rapporteur, I pressed for that in a Westminster Hall debate and, although we did not get the full rapporteur, the Government assured us that we would have an annual report and...

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c583
House
House of Commons

The Minister has given me half the assurance I sought. The other half was about having not just the report, but having it debated in Parliament.

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c583
House
House of Commons

With the experts at the ISA making a judgment about whether someone should have barred status, why is another layer of bureaucracy introduced by giving that information to the police to allow them to make a further judgment about whether that should be disclosed to a school, for example? Why...

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c578
House
House of Commons

This is where we differ on the appropriate way to treat the bar. We believe that if there are circumstances which would otherwise not necessarily have been disclosed for the ISA to make that judgment, it is appropriate to allow that information to be disclosed to the police and for...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c579
House
House of Commons

We intend that the ISA should provide that information to the police, as I explained. We will be very focused on the way in which the measure is implemented to ensure that that reflects our intentions and that the police have the relevant information for an enhanced check. I recognise...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c579-80
House
House of Commons

That was a very nice introduction from the Minister. I know that he is standing in for one of his colleagues, which is always challenging. In my two proposals which have won support from Members on both sides of the House, although owing to shortness of time only the names...

Member
Fiona Mactaggart (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c580-3
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that implied threat, which is at the moment rather more effective coming from his direction than from mine, but nevertheless there is support for the concept on both sides of the House. I know that the Minister is stepping into another Minister's shoes, and...

Member
Fiona Mactaggart (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c583
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, I shall briefly respond to the hon. Lady's two points about trafficking. On the first point, about the requirement for a rapporteur under article 19 of the EU directive, we still take the view that the requirement can be met through the inter-departmental ministerial...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c583
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend. She speaks with great knowledge and makes very important points. Those two issues are key when it comes to looking at supervision, volunteering and information sharing. The problem is with the looseness of the definition of supervision. Supervision must be close enough to...

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c574-6
House
House of Commons

In many respects, I am speaking on behalf of the Minister for Equalities, who is also responsible for criminal information; she would wish to be here if it were not for a family emergency. This group of amendments relates to parts 5 and 7 of the Bill. Part 5 will...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c576-8
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for giving way and for her kind words. I apologise that I was not quite in the Chamber when she started speaking. Are there not two areas of risk? First, if someone has something in their background that has previously been identified, it should be...

Member
Meg Munn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c573-4
House
House of Commons

I ask the hon. Gentleman, who always speaks up for the rights of the individual, this: why should a totally innocent person who seeks to intervene to stop a fight—one of the have-a-go heroes of this world, of whom he is the champion, not just in Shipley, but in other...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c571
House
House of Commons

I will have another go. Rather than asking me a question, although I am happy to debate it at a later date, I wonder whether the right hon. Gentleman will answer my question: how was this person negatively affected by having their details on the DNA database?

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c571
House
House of Commons

Yes, I do. My hon. Friend is absolutely right. There is a concern about certain other groups, as well as those in ethnic minority communities, whose DNA is retained disproportionately. We have proportionately the largest DNA database of any country in the world. I am sorry to say that at...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c571
House
House of Commons

I wish to bring the right hon. Gentleman back to the case of his constituent who intervened in the fight and was put on the DNA database. How has that person's life been negatively affected by having those details on the DNA database? Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c571
House
House of Commons

I wish to put on the record the fact that Lords amendments 33 to 36 are very welcome, as they relate to a matter raised in Committee and on Report, and directly with the Prime Minister. Originally, the Government planned that anyone committing a serious sexual offence against a child...

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c572-3
House
House of Commons

I thought that I had answered the hon. Gentleman's question. Why should a person in such a situation, through no fault of their own, have any part of their identity retained by a third party, given that they were not involved in any criminal offence? This is about freedom and...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c572
House
House of Commons

Is my right hon. Friend concerned about the disproportionate number of black and ethnic minority people whose records are kept and the disproportionate number of young people who are pulled in for questioning because of incidents in the street and although often no charge is made, their DNA is kept,...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c571
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister respond to my hon. Friend's excellent point about the appointment of guardians? It was an excellent point that reflects the recommendations of the Home Affairs Committee when we produced our major report two years ago on human trafficking. The appointment of a guardian would provide the best...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c584
House
House of Commons

Unfortunately, the second point is outside my gift and within that of the business managers, but I certainly assure my hon. Friend about the publication of the report, and I hope that my comments on the rapporteur function are helpful. Secondly, on the hon. Lady's point about the assurance made...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c584
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman makes an important point, and for the reason he cites we asked the Children's Commissioner to review the practical care arrangements for trafficked children. We said that the right step at this stage was to seek that input, rather than to seek to legislate, recognising equally...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c584
House
House of Commons

I rise to respond briefly to a number of the points raised this afternoon. Let me assure my hon. Friends the Members for North East Somerset (Jacob Rees-Mogg), for Ipswich (Ben Gummer) and for Wycombe (Steve Baker) of this Government's commitment and resolve to roll back the arms of the...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c535-6
House
House of Commons

I, too, support the general thrust of Lords amendments 16 to 18, but I completely understand the Minister's concerns about the effect they would have on the legislation. I very much agree with my hon. Friend the Member for North East Somerset (Jacob Rees-Mogg) on the need for some sort...

Member
Ben Gummer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c535
House
House of Commons

When I look at Lords amendments 16 to 18, my instinct is certainly to support them, but after many, many hours in Committee with my hon. Friend the Minister, I know that he has a thoroughgoing commitment to progress towards liberty, so I assure him of my future support for...

Member
Steve Baker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c535
House
House of Commons