Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 19 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
We have carefully considered the issue of the balance between the lay magistracy and the more professional judiciary. On the specific issues in question, we judge that because of the likely number of cases and the role required, the current measures are the right ones. However, we will continue to keep this under review as the legislation comes into effect and is applied.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 542 c570
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Databases Biometrics Detainees Fingerprints DNA Human rights EU law Human trafficking Harassment Internet Powers of entry Vetting Terrorism Schools Stop and search Sexual offences Voluntary work Stalking
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 14:51:04 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_818897
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_818897
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_818897