Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,622 results for legtitle:"Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The coalition programme for government undertook to introduce a new “Public Reading Stage” for Bills to give the public an opportunity to comment on proposed legislation online.

In pursuance of this aim the Government have conducted two pilot Public Reading Stages on the Cabinet Office website, in respect of the Protection...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Written statements
Date
17 January 2013
Reference
556 cc44-5WS
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
1 May 2012
Reference
CHAP 9 2012
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
1 May 2012
Reference
543 c1371
House
House of Commons

I am puzzled by the principle that the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, is enunciating. Is he not aware that throughout a whole swathe of legislation lines have to be drawn? Parliament is responsible for drawing the line where it thinks that it is right and sensible. His argument that you...

Member
Lord Lawson of Blaby (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1722
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak, as I did on a previous occasion, in support of the general principles of which the noble Lord, Lord Marlesford, has spoken. In particular, he has done a service to this House, and indeed to the other place in enabling it to undergo an...

Member
Lord Borrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1721-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we should take this opportunity, which follows the vote on a previous occasion when the House by a majority voted in favour of the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Marlesford. We now have a revised and better version of his amendment. But it has...

Member
Lord Neill of Bladen (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1722-3
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful for the intervention of the noble Lord, Lord Lawson, because I entirely agree with what he said. I am concerned that this notion of picking out one group of officials has been made by a private Member of the House of Lords proposing this amendment without...

Member
Lord Borrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1722
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is probably old enough —I certainly am—to remember the days when an Englishman's home was always referred to as his castle. Castles are besieged by mice. What worries me about this is that the officers who will have powers to enter my castle and your Lordships' castles—mine...

Member
Lord Elton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1723-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly agree with the noble Lord, Lord Neill. With this very convenient amendment at this late stage, it seems to me that the time has come for the Government, if necessary, to come forward with a sensible amendment that could be produced extremely quickly. They absolutely do...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1723
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may make a brief and slightly croaky intervention—I go one up on my noble friend Lord Borrie—as president of the Trading Standards Institute. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Marlesford, for engaging so closely with trading standards over the past number of months since first introducing...

Member
Baroness Crawley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1724
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to support the proposed amendment. It relates to the circumstances in which a statutory instrument or legislation can give authority to regulators—not the police as their powers are enshrined in statute and are not in question—to enter private property without the consent of the owner or...

Member
Lord Scott of Foscote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1719-20
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the House will recall that Amendments 16 to 18 provide that powers of entry may be exercised only either with the agreement of the occupier of the premises in question or on the authority of a warrant unless the authority using the power, "““can demonstrate that the aim...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1714-6
House
House of Lords

That this House do not insist on its Amendments 16, 17 and 18, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 18A. 18A Because the Commons consider that the imposition of general restrictions of this nature on the exercise of powers of entry could undermine actions to protect public...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1714
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when the Prime Minister exhorted his Ministers yesterday to raise their game, I suddenly realised that that is exactly what I am trying to do today. That is why I am bringing back this amendment, now redrafted, which noble Lords on all sides supported in February and which...

Member
Lord Marlesford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1716-9
House
House of Lords

At end insert ““but do propose Amendment 16B as an amendment in lieu”” 16B: Page 33, line 33, at end insert— ““(3) Further safeguards shall be that— (a) unless explicitly provided for in the statute providing for the power of entry, all powers of entry shall be exercised by agreement...

Member
Lord Marlesford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1716
House
House of Lords

At end insert ““but do propose Amendment 51F as an amendment to Amendment 51C”” 51F: Line 3, at end insert ““or (iii) causes B to fear for B's personal safety or the safety of another””

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1736
House
House of Lords

My Lords, today we are almost there: a new law on stalking, for which Parliament rather than Government has been in the driving seat. Over the past six months, a staggering amount of progress has been made, much of it due to the advocacy of noble Lords on all Benches....

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1736-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, last Wednesday was the second annual National Stalking Awareness Day and two events were held simultaneously here and in the Scottish Parliament. They differed radically from the event held one year before because all those present in London were able to celebrate the introduction of this Bill, promoted...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1738-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can respond relatively briefly and will deal, I hope, with most of the points. First, to protect the honour of the Home Office, I correct just one point made by my noble friend Lady Brinton. She talked about there being a department in the Home Office known...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1740-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what we have heard today emphasises the need for training for the police and maybe other agencies, and the need to be alert to behaviour that may escalate, having started as apparently comparatively innocent. I was relieved to hear my noble friend say that these amendments are unnecessary...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2012
Reference
736 c1740
House
House of Lords