Skip to main content

1-20 of 466 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Department for Exiting the European Union
Subject X
Ministerial powers

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Ministerial powers (466)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c893
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak to new clause 1 and amendments 2 and 1, which stand in my name and those of my right hon. and hon. Friends. As you are aware, Mr Speaker, this remaining group contains a significant number of important issues, and while I want to spend time...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 cc906-7
House
House of Commons

Is it not the case that workers’ rights have no privileged status under the Bill? Once the Bill becomes an Act, those rights can be picked off by secondary legislation. If the Government wish to prevent workers from receiving proper holiday pay or to cap awards for discrimination, they will...

Member
Melanie Onn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c907
House
House of Commons

That is absolutely true. The Government would be able to do that by using subordinate legislation in other Acts of Parliament. That applies not just to workers’ rights, but to other areas of law such as the environment and consumer rights. That category of law will lose its underpinnings following...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 cc907-8
House
House of Commons

Is it not important for the public to be reassured about workers’ rights, given reports in the media of Cabinet discussions about scrapping the working time directive?

Member
Chris Stephens (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c908
House
House of Commons

I think most of our constituents assume that the guarantees that they currently enjoy will continue. They will not know that many of these rights flow from and are underpinned by EU law, but they would expect them to be transposed in a way that would provide the same level...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 cc908-9
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for being so generous with his time. There are many cases, such as Marshalls Clay Products Ltd v. Caulfield and Gibson v. East Riding of Yorkshire Council, in which domestic courts have reached incorrect decisions on workers’ rights. If the European Court of Justice will...

Member
Melanie Onn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c909
House
House of Commons

After the transitional period, the ECJ would not be the adjudicator. That would be dealt with as a matter of retained law. My hon. Friend has reinforced a point that I made earlier. We need a level of enhanced protection and the courts need clarity on how to interpret this...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c909
House
House of Commons

I hope shortly to be able to make a brief speech on that very subject, dealing with the question of whether or not there should be a

power for the courts to disapply Acts of Parliament in relation to the matters to which the hon. Gentleman has referred.

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c909
House
House of Commons

I am not sure that that warranted an intervention, but I await the hon. Gentleman’s contribution with bated breath.

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c910
House
House of Commons

Further to the point made by my hon. Friend the Member for Great Grimsby (Melanie Onn), does my hon. Friend agree that either the institutions and agencies that currently enforce EU rights, privileges and protections should be maintained as EU agencies, or a transitional arrangement should involve agencies and institutions...

Member
Geraint Davies (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c910
House
House of Commons

I certainly believe that, when it is appropriate and when the country will derive benefit, we should continue to participate in EU agencies. The important point, however, is that when the functions and powers of EU agencies are transferred to either an existing or a new body, the purpose, scope...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c910
House
House of Commons

With regard to the issue of transition or implementation, as the Government call it, does my hon. Friend agree that while it is of course necessary in particular to give time for our businesses to prepare, transition or implementation is no safe harbour if this Government are determined to pursue...

Member
Chuka Umunna (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c910
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree; and the unpicking of, or wheeling back from, some of the progress we felt had been made in the Florence speech is one of our concerns.

The Bill before us was drafted before the Florence speech, but rather than amend the Bill to reflect the evolution of Government...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 cc910-1
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman just used the phrase “legal certainty” in referring to our departure from the EU on 29 March 2019. Does that mean that he has seen legal advice that article 50 cannot be revoked? Is the Labour Front-Bench position that it is impossible, as opposed to politically inexpedient,...

Member
Peter Grant (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c911
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman tempts me down an avenue that has nothing to do with the point I am making, which is that it remains unclear why the Government tabled three exit day amendments to their own Bill which have sown further confusion. We do not know why they did that—whether...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c911
House
House of Commons

I think that is a virtual certainty in any event. On the basis of the Bill that the Government have promised the House for the end of this year, it seems to me that it will be a substitute for the arrangements under the existing European Communities Act, so I...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c911
House
House of Commons

I agree, but what I would say—and why I would urge Members to support this amendment—is that it need not require the amendment of this Bill to allow the facilitation of transitional arrangements on the same terms in addition to the provisions that the right hon. and learned Gentleman is...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 cc911-2
House
House of Commons

I am glad to see my right hon. Friend the Member for New Forest West (Sir Desmond Swayne) in his place behind me, where I always welcome him. When I arrived, I inquired whether he had had a cup of coffee before today’s long proceedings, and I undertake to try...

Member
Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 cc912-3
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Peter Grant (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2018
Reference
634 c913
House
House of Commons