Proceeding contribution from Matthew Pennycook (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 17 January 2018. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill
After the transitional period, the ECJ would not be the adjudicator. That would be dealt with as a matter of retained law. My hon. Friend has reinforced a point that I made earlier. We need a level of enhanced protection and the courts need clarity on how to interpret this new category of law, because if they do not have that clarity and certainty, they will be more vulnerable.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 634 c909
- Session
- 2017-19
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Belfast Agreement Borders Equality Environment protection EU law EU budget Ministerial powers Northern Ireland Powers Payments Parliamentary scrutiny Public participation Republic of Ireland Trade Transitional arrangements European Court of Justice Customs unions Brexit
- Legislation
- European Union (Withdrawal) Bill 2017-19
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2018-06-14 09:16:41 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-01-17/18011721000105
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-01-17/18011721000105
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-01-17/18011721000105