Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:Finance

Answering member X
Baroness May of Maidenhead
Session X
2015-16

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
May of Maidenhead, Baroness (20)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Urgent question on the details of the Border Force budget for 2016-17.

Lead member
Andy Burnham
Answering member
Baroness May of Maidenhead
Department
Home Office
Type
Urgent questions
Date
20 April 2016
Reference
608 cc922-932
House
House of Commons

What assessment she has made of the effect of changes in the level of funding on the work of the fire and rescue service.

Asked by
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
11 April 2016
Reference
904378; 608 cc8-9
House
House of Commons

Fire and rescue authorities have delivered significant savings since 2010, and fire deaths and injuries are at near historical lows. Authorities can still work smarter and reduce costs. Between 2009-10 and 2014-15, single-purpose fire authorities’ non-ring-fenced reserves rose by 136% to £561 million. Those resources should be targeted at achieving long-term efficiencies.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 April 2016
Reference
608 c8
House
House of Commons

First, may I send my condolences to the family of that individual firefighter in the hon. Gentleman’s constituency? The suicide of any firefighter is a great tragedy, and of course we recognise the pressures and the difficult job that firefighters do. However, the number of fires they are having to be called to has been reducing—as I said, the number of fire deaths and injuries is now at near historic lows—and so the job of being a firefighter has been changing over the years. For example, firefighters are now doing more fire prevention work, which is very valuable work for communities. As we look forward to greater collaboration between firefighters and the police service, we can look to an even better service being provided for communities.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 April 2016
Reference
608 c8
House
House of Commons

I am very happy to join my hon. Friend in doing exactly that, as we see in Northamptonshire a very good example of the benefits collaboration can bring. Indeed, my right hon. Friend the Minister for Policing, Fire, Criminal Justice and Victims was in Northampton last week to open a joint fire station and police station, which shows the benefits of collaboration, not only in saving money, but in providing a better service to the public.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 April 2016
Reference
608 c9
House
House of Commons

As I indicated, we have seen a significant reduction in the number of incidents; from 2004-05 to 2014-15, the number of incidents fire and rescue services went to declined by 42%. As I said in response to the question from the hon. Member for Stalybridge and Hyde (Jonathan Reynolds), although firefighters do still find themselves being called to fires, a lot of their work is also about other services to the community. They are doing an excellent job but we want to see how that can be done even better and how they can work better in collaboration with the police, as we have seen in places such as Northamptonshire.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 April 2016
Reference
608 c9
House
House of Commons

Yet again, the Labour party goes down the road of thinking that the only thing that matters is the number of police officers or firefighters available. The hon. Lady talks about full-time firefighters, but may I pay tribute to those people who volunteer as firefighters in their community, as they are often overlooked when we examine the issue of firefighters? What matters is not just the number of people we have, but how we are spending the money and how we are deploying our resources. That is where the efficiencies we have seen and the collaboration we see will result in not just savings, but a better service to the public.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 April 2016
Reference
608 c9
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman has written to me on this subject, and I have responded to him. The Home Office’s budget was published under the comprehensive spending review as normal last November. As with the rest of the Government, individual allocations within Departments are not routinely published. However, what matters—he is right—is that we have a secure border, and that is why we have a transformation plan with Border Force and why we have changed Border Force over the last few years from the dysfunctional United Kingdom Border Agency we inherited from the last Labour Government.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 April 2016
Reference
608 c18
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend raises an important point and describes the variety of tasks that our police forces carry out, and the variety of skills and operational capabilities that they need. I am very conscious of the marine capability requirements in Hampshire. It is, of course, an operational matter for the police to determine how they spend their budget and what they use it for. Crucially, my right hon. Friend the Chancellor has ensured that we can protect police budgets, when precept is taken into account, over the next four years.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 April 2016
Reference
608 c22
House
House of Commons

Nineteenth opposition day debate (part two). Negatived on division (193 to 279).

Lead member
Andy Burnham
Answering member
Baroness May of Maidenhead
Department
Home Office
Type
Opposition days
Date
24 February 2016
Reference
606
House
House of Commons

The picture that the hon. Gentleman has set out of the South Yorkshire force is not one that I recognise. We have protected, if we take the police precept into account, police budgets across the period of the comprehensive spending review. I should have thought that he welcomed that, given that his Front-Bench team proposed that police budgets could be cut by 10%.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
22 February 2016
Reference
606 c7
House
House of Commons

I remember the days when the hon. Lady and I served on the council of the London Borough of Merton. She took an interest in domestic violence and support for its victims and survivors then, and she continues to do so now. Of course, the Government have put extra money into refuges and supported money for various domestic violence services. It is a terrible crime and we need to deal with it.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
22 February 2016
Reference
606 c20
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the budget was for the UK Border Force and its predecessor in (a) 2009-10, (b) 2010-11, (c) 2011-12, (d) 2012-13, (e) 2013-14, (f) 2014-15 and (g) 2015-16; and what the UK Border Force's planned budget is for 2016-17.

Asked by
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
23143
House
House of Commons

Ninth opposition day debate. Negatived on division (214 to 343).

Lead member
Andy Burnham
Answering member
Jack Dromey; Baroness May of Maidenhead; Mike Penning
Department
Home Office
Type
Opposition days
Date
4 November 2015
Reference
601 cc998-1077
House
House of Commons

What modelling has been conducted by her Department on the potential effect on individual police forces proposed changes to the police funding formula.

Asked by
Nick Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
901481; 600 cc1-3
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend makes a good point, and I commend him for the work on the innovation fund that he did when he was Policing Minister. This is an important development and he is right to welcome and commend Kent police for what they are doing with body-worn video cameras. That is an important step forward. We are also looking at the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 to ensure that every part of the system can support the use of evidence from body-worn video cameras. I am sure the whole House recognises that that important step forward is of benefit to the police but also to victims.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c3
House
House of Commons

I am interested in the right hon. Gentleman’s question. In his capacity as Chair of the Home Affairs Committee he has previously questioned the funding formula for policing, and indicated that an alternative formula might be a better way forward. That is what we are doing; we are trying to find a formula that will work across police forces, and that is why we held and responded to a public consultation. As I said earlier, my right hon. Friend the Policing Minister has written to police and crime commissioners and chief constables with a revision of that formula, and he will discuss the matter with them.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c3
House
House of Commons

I welcome my hon. Friend’s comments on Northamptonshire police, who have indeed been very innovative. They have been at the forefront of work to join together the police force and the fire authority to ensure savings and a better service for the people of the county of Northamptonshire. We are trying to adopt a funding formula that is simpler than the previous one, that is fair across the board and that people can look at and understand; a funding formula where people can appreciate why the elements are in there. That cannot be said of the current funding formula.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c3
House
House of Commons

How funding should be allocated to the police in future is a complex and important matter, and we conducted a detailed analytical review before launching a public consultation on reform of the current funding arrangements. We have considered carefully the responses received from that consultation, and my right hon. Friend the Policing Minister has written to all police and crime commissioners and chief constables with refinements to the proposed model in the light of the feedback received.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c1
House
House of Commons

The Home Office is already working with other Departments to ensure that, if matters are better the responsibility of other Departments, those other Departments take them on board. A good example is what we have been doing for people with mental health needs. We have worked with the Department of Health, and it has provided funding to ensure more places of safety that are not police cells. We have significantly reduced the use of police cells for those in mental health crisis or with mental health problems. As a result resources have been released for the police and, crucially, there are much better outcomes for people with mental health problems and issues.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c1
House
House of Commons