Proceeding contribution from Greg Clark (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 March 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Land Registry Office (Peterborough).
Land Registry Office (Peterborough)
I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing this important debate. Does he share my view that across all public services we need to find a way to provide those services most cost-effectively? The issue is whether decisions that might be made this year could prove more expensive to undo in future years should demand increase. That is the essence of the matter—is the economic case that is being prepared robust enough or, if it is wrong, could it lead to further public expense?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 506 c317WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Closures Civil servants Fees and charges Location Redundancy Offices Peterborough HM Land Registry
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:03:27 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_626524
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_626524
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_626524