Written question asked by Lynne Jones (Labour), in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 2 March 1994. It was answered by Charles Wardle (Conservative) on Wednesday, 2 March 1994 on behalf of the Home Office.
Home Office
- Question
- What were the reasons for declining to insert a clause in the sale agreement for the privatisation of DTELS requiring the purchaser not to change staff terms and conditions without their prior agreement; & what consideration he has given to offering staff of DTELS a five-year deal protecting the severance and redundancy terms after the organisation is privatised; and what were the reasons for his decision.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 238 c737W;238 c739W
- Session
- 1993-94
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Executive agencies Civil service Privatisation Redundancy pay Redundancy Directorate of Telecommunications
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-24 20:14:13 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_333362
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_333362
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_333362