Skip to main content

1-20 of 460 results for subject:"Royal Mint"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 21 January 2026 to Question 105773 on Chinese Embassy: Royal Mint, if she will provide a summary of what the Note Verbale stated on the granting of permission.

Asked by
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
113787
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, Pursuant to the answer of 25 November 2025, to Question 91404, on Embassies: Royal Mint, if he will publish the Note Verbale dated 4 May 2018 relating to the consent to the People's Republic of China for Royal...

Asked by
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
105773
House
House of Commons

I. Decision letter dated 20/01/2026 regarding planning application made by the Chinese Embassy in the UK: Royal Mint Court, London EC3N 4QN. Incl. Annex A - Schedule of representations; Annex B1 - Listed building consent conditions; Annex B2 - Planning permission conditions; and Planning Inspector's report. 240p. II. Annex C...

Deposited by
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Deposited papers
Date
20 January 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0035
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Urgent question representations made to Five Eyes partners on the potential risks posed by the proximity of sensitive cabling infrastructure to the site of the proposed new Chinese embassy.

Lead member
Sarah Champion
Answering member
Seema Malhotra
Department
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Urgent questions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 cc67-77
House
House of Commons

(Urgent Question): To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs if she will make a statement on representations made to Five Eyes partners on the potential risks posed by the proximity of sensitive cabling infrastructure to the site of the proposed new Chinese embassy.

Member
Sarah Champion (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c67
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for her question, and I am grateful for the opportunity to respond to it. She will know that discussions with Five Eyes partners relating to domestic security matters are primarily a responsibility for the Home Office. The decision on planning permission for the proposed Chinese...

Member
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c67
House
House of Commons

I hear what the Minister has said, but I am not reassured and neither are our partners. We have now had interventions from the Dutch Government, the Swiss Parliament, and the Swedish Parliament, and we have had two interventions from the White House on the risks posed to UK infrastructure...

Member
Sarah Champion (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 cc67-8
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for her remarks. I reiterate that our intelligence services have been involved throughout. A range of measures have been developed and are being implemented to protect national security. She will also know that the Government are still to make a decision. That planning decision will...

Member
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c68
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Rotherham (Sarah Champion) on her question. One could be excused for feeling that this is groundhog day, because once again the House has gathered to share our collective concern about plans to approve the Chinese Communist party’s mega-embassy and once again the Home Office...

Member
Alicia Kearns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 cc68-9
House
House of Commons

I thank the shadow Minister for her remarks. First, in relation to the Prime Minister’s visit, any prime ministerial or ministerial travel will be confirmed in the usual way. Secondly, it is right, and we are clear, that the planning decision is one for the Secretary of State for Housing,...

Member
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 cc69-70
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will be aware that the site of the proposed embassy is in my constituency. I have relayed the concerns of my constituents to the Government on a number of occasions. They are concerned about the security issues, about the human rights record of the Chinese Government and...

Member
Rushanara Ali (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c70
House
House of Commons

I know that my hon. Friend has raised her concerns a number of times. I reiterate that national security considerations are always the first duty of any Government, and the security and intelligence agencies have been involved throughout this process. As I noted in my opening remarks, the two national...

Member
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c70
House
House of Commons

The Liberal Democrats have made it clear from the beginning of this saga that the approval of China’s super-embassy would be a terrible betrayal of Hongkongers who moved to the UK to escape the very repression that the Government are now inviting to their doorstep. The Government must halt the...

Member
Luke Taylor (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 cc49-71
House
House of Commons

It is important to agree that the decision to provide China with consent to use the Royal Mint as diplomatic premises was made in 2018 by the previous Government under the former Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, and was subject to planning permission. China purchased the site on that basis. That...

Member
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c71
House
House of Commons

I think I heard my hon. Friend say clearly that the Government would not stand for coercion by the Chinese diplomatic service. Has the Foreign Office not been looking at what has been going on over the last 10 years? At the consulate in Manchester, people who were demonstrating against...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c71
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right that we must not tolerate any attempts by foreign Governments to coerce, intimidate or harass. He has highlighted some examples that have caused great concern and that we take extremely seriously. We continue to assess potential threats in the United Kingdom, and the protection of...

Member
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 cc71-2
House
House of Commons

The Intelligence and Security Committee was set up specifically to fill a gap in oversight whereby this House could not directly look at highly classified and sensitive information. Having chaired that Committee throughout the previous Parliament, when we undertook our very detailed and sensitive inquiry into China—the published version of...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c72
House
House of Commons

I recognise and acknowledge the right hon. Member’s deep experience in the House and from chairing the ISC. Matters of security and intelligence continue to be the first priority of this Government. In relation to national security and in respect of the National Security Adviser, our partners abroad and Five...

Member
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c72
House
House of Commons

The Speaker of the US Congress, Mike Johnson, was here today in Parliament. Last night, when asked about the Chinese embassy application, he said:

“I’m concerned about it…But if it were me, I would be very cautious about that.”

The Minister has heard the caution in this House and from the US...

Member
Alex Sobel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c72
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will know from his own discussions that we continue to routinely engage with and discuss a wide range of national security issues with the US. Indeed, the US has also had its own relatively recent experience of China building a new embassy in its capital. I recognise...

Member
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
779 c72
House
House of Commons