Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,688 results for legtitle:"Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Notice given that Her Majesty has given her Royal Assent to the following Acts: Civil Aviation Act (CHAP 34), Fraud Act (CHAP 35), Wireless Telegraphy Act (CHAP 36), Parliamentary Costs Act (CHAP 37), Violent Crime Reduction Act (CHAP 38), Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Act (CHAP 39), Education and Inspections Act (CHAP...

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
451 826-830
House
House of Commons

Civil Aviation Bill (CHAP 34), Fraud Bill (HL) (CHAP 35), Wireless Telegraphy Bill (HL) (CHAP 36), Parliamentary Costs Bill (HL) (CHAP 37), Violent Crime Reduction Bill (CHAP 38), Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill (CHAP 39), Education and Inspections Bill (CHAP 40), National Health Service Bill (HL) (CHAP 41), National Health Service...

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
451 c825
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
CHAP 49 2006

My Lords, I beg to move Motion B, That the House do not insist on its disagreement to Commons Amendment No. 5 and do not insist on its Amendments Nos. 5A and 5B in lieu. Use of retro-reflective tape is already permitted and many heavy vehicle operators have already opted...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c667-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister gave a masterful defence. Because the Government do not want to do something, he and his officials have done a wonderful trawl of 150 reasons why it should not happen. I am sure that those reasons are all true, and I commend him for the detail...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c670
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is so. We have introduced an increased sentence, which is what we were committed to. The position is quite clear. We have had the benefit of extensive debates from which we have all learnt a lot. The Government listened carefully. The other place listened to and saw...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c677
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful. I looked up the manifesto, and it did not commit to prison for death by careless driving; it committed to an increased sentence.

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c677
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to everyone who has contributed to this short debate. It was inevitable that I would be obliged to reiterate the fundamental argument of principle that we have had on previous occasions. My prediction of the response of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lyell, proved...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c677
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall be very brief. Yesterday I received a DVD from a police officer serving in Leicestershire Constabulary showing three very short interviews for the local television about careless driving and various other matters. The final one, without prompting or priming beforehand, was an interview with two people...

Member
Viscount Simon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c677
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will wind up in a minute, but the Minister repeated these arguments and said that the matter had been carefully considered. It is probably one of the most important matters that has come before the House in this Session. The Government have made one of the most...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c676-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to interrupt the noble and learned Lord, but it is not normal practice at this stage to repeat all the arguments that we have heard over previous stages. Perhaps the House would appreciate it if he wound up.

Member
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c676
House
House of Lords

My Lords, clearly, my noble friend Lord Hanningfield is right that we should not pursue this any further and we should agree to the Motion. If the Opposition make a mistake in voting or in procedure, we have to live with it; the Minister isright on that point. However, I...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c674
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Earl was wrong in referring to a six-month ban. I think that the obligatory ban is 12 months, which, in my view—maybe not his—would be justified in that case.

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c675
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not sure whether it was a six-month or a 12-month ban, but either way a motorist who is prosecuted for that offence will fight like hell in the Crown Court.

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c675
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are in a sad position, as this is bad legislation that will do injustice. None the less, I thank the Minister because, although we have disagreed strongly on all these matters, he has been unfailingly courteous and his ministerial colleagues have given me a good deal of...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c675-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do not insist on its disagreement to Commons Amendment No. 6, on which the Commons have insisted for their reason 6B. We return once again to the offence of causing death by careless driving. The question before us today is whether...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c671-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for his last point about that word, which I do not intend to repeat! But I accept his point. He says that there should be pressure for voluntary compliance. Some vehicles are fitted with that tape—and it is permitted for people...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c670-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for what he has said. The Bill has been closely examined by this House, and the other place has had the opportunity to reconsider it. It has chosen not to do so. I take fairly seriously the Minister’s remark that it is for the...

Member
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c674
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not detain your Lordships for any longer than I strictly have to. Suffice to say, we know the arguments well. Sadly, we have been unable to reach any sort of agreement on the merits or suitability of this provision. It is of some concern given, as...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c673-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, am disappointed, as bureaucracy seems to have got in the way of common sense. I am sure that some accidents would be avoided if these proposals were implemented. The results are usually very bad for the person who hits a heavy lorry, rather than the other...

Member
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
686 c670
House
House of Lords