Skip to main content

1-20 of 77 results for legtitle:"Alcohol Labelling Bill (HL) 2007-08"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Alcohol Labelling Bill (HL). Lords third reading (formal). Passed and sent to the Commons.

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
1 July 2008
Reference
703 c133
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 1: Page 5, line 16, leave out paragraphs (a) and (b) and insert ““to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale”” The noble Baroness said: My Lords, before I speak to the amendment, perhaps I may remind the House of my various relevant interests...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
702 c639-40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, support the amendment. A fine at level 5 on the standard scale, which is £5,000, is quite appropriate.

Member
Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
702 c640
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join my noble friend in expressing disquiet at the draconian nature of the penalties proposed in the original Bill. The noble Lord, Lord Mitchell, has always been extremely reasonable and accommodating during our deliberations, so if it is indeed the case that he will accept the amendment,...

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
702 c640
House
House of Lords

My Lords, again I congratulate my noble friend on the progress that his Bill continues to make through the House. In the interests of not repeating arguments made in Committee, I do not intend to speak at length. My noble friend knows the Government’s position: we are monitoring the progress...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
702 c640
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not have anything to add to what has been said and I thank all noble Lords for their support. On Question, amendment agreed to.

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
702 c640
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on reflection and having considered all the issues I, too, have come to the conclusion that banging someone up for two years for an infringement such as this is somewhat excessive, so I am happy to support the noble Baroness in her amendment.

Member
Lord Mitchell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
702 c640
House
House of Lords

Alcohol Labelling Bill (HL). Lords report stage debate. Agreed to on question.

Department
Department of Health
Type
Debates on bills
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
702 c639-40
House
House of Lords
Member
Lord Mitchell (Labour)
Type
Private members' bills (HL)
Date
11 June 2008
Reference
HL Bill 64 2007-08
House
House of Lords

I am intending to move Amendments Nos. 24 and 25.

Member
Lord Mitchell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c421
House
House of Lords

Does that mean that the noble Lord will not move Amendments Nos. 24 and 25?

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c421
House
House of Lords

In that case, I will support the noble Baroness on this.

Member
Lord Mitchell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c422
House
House of Lords

Is it in order for me to speak at the same time on whether Clauses 3 and 4 should stand part of the Bill? They are all grouped together and the arguments interrelate.

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c417
House
House of Lords

I see the point of Clause 5, but if somebody buys a can of beer at an alcoholic strength of 3 per cent, it is half as dangerous as a can of a rival beer which has 6 per cent alcohol. It seems rather draconian to say that this should...

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c419
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 22: 22: Clause 8, page 3, line 29, leave out paragraphs (a) to (c) and insert ““a local authority”” The noble Baroness said: The purpose of this amendment is to ensure that we do not leave any enforcement loopholes. The best way of doing that is to...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c419
House
House of Lords

I am always in favour of simplifying things and getting rid of bureaucracy. On the size of the print, however, I have studied quite a few wine bottles, and I have noted that when the warning is about 1 millimetre high, it is very difficult to read. As the noble...

Member
Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c418
House
House of Lords

Thank you. It would be sensible to lose Clauses 2, 3 and 4, and it would not damage or reduce the overall impact of the Bill to do so. As they stand, the clauses are over-restrictive, inflexible and not helpful. Clause 2 is superfluous given that the food labelling regulations,...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c417-8
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 14 to 20: 14: Clause 3, page 2, line 10, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” 15: Clause 3, page 2, line 11, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” 16: Clause 3, page 2, line 12, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” 17: Clause 3, page 2,...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c418-9
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether the noble Lord, Lord McColl, has understood that it will be up to the Government of the day to decide on the size of the lettering and the colouring. It is not in the Bill, but it has been turned into an enabling Bill. I think that...

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c418
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 3: 3: Clause 1, page 1, line 3, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” The noble Baroness said: Amendment No. 3 and those identical to it deal with replacing the word ““warning”” with the word ““advice””. Again, the parallel with smoking is an issue. For tobacco products,...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c413-4
House
House of Lords