Skip to main content

101-150 of 2,305 results for subject:Injunctions

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (11) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (5) + Public bills (5)
-
Government bills (4)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (4)
-
Statutory instruments (4)
+ Members' contributions (1,991)
-
Business questions (4)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (32)
+ Oral questions (34)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,924)
-
Speaker's rulings (1)
+ Parliamentary committees (70) + Committee proceedings (61)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (22)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (22)
-
Select Committee reports (6)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (2)
-
Select Committee written evidence (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (55)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Deposited papers (15)
-
House of Commons papers (27)
-
House of Lords papers (6)
-
Impact assessments (4)
-
Unprinted papers (3)
-
White papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (117) + Debates (87)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (61)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (22)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (22)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (58)
-
Debates on bills (53)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (5)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (26) + Oral statements (6)
-
Ministerial statements (5)
-
Personal statements (1)
-
Written statements (20)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (179)
-
Business questions (4)
+ Oral questions (34)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (138)
+ Research briefings (13)
-
Commons Briefing papers (8)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what their position is on seeking super-injunctions to restrict reporting of public policy issues.

Asked by
Lord Kempsell (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 July 2025
Reference
HL9558
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how many super-injunctions are currently in force in England and Wales.

Asked by
Lord Kempsell (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 July 2025
Reference
HL9557
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many injunctions have been filed by government departments since 5 July 2024.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 July 2025
Reference
68114
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on a significant data protection breach from February 2022 relating to the Afghan relocations and assistance policy.

Lead member
Lord Coaker
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1837-1852
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the Minister for taking the time to speak with me extensively before the Statement. I thank him and his colleague, the Secretary of State for Defence in the other place, for the tone they have adopted. I join the Secretary of State and...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1841-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister and to the Minister for the Armed Forces for a briefing yesterday. It meant that, temporarily, I was under a super-injunction. I was a little surprised when I was summoned to the MoD. On Monday afternoon I received a message asking me...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1842-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baronesses, Lady Goldie and Lady Smith, for their comments and their words about the way in which the Government tried to inform His Majesty’s Opposition and the defence spokesperson for the Liberal Democrats. We tried to ensure that as many Members of your Lordships’...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1844-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the reporting is correct, I understand that the date of the super-injunction was 1 September 2023 and that it was granted at the instigation of the then Defence Secretary, Grant Shapps. Eight months later, in debates on the safety of Rwanda Bill, I repeatedly moved an amendment...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for his question. My understanding—and there are better lawyers in here than I—is that the Ministers would have believed themselves to be subject to the injunction and the super-injunction, and that would constrain what they would or would not be able to say. But now...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it has been stated again and again that the person responsible for the loss of data thought that the spreadsheet contained a small number of names, whereas it actually contained

a very large number of names. Surely this is irrelevant. It is the fact that it was used...

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1846
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble and gallant Lord for this important question, which the noble Baronesses, Lady Smith and Lady Goldie, also asked, as to how on earth this could have happened. First of all, it was really important to ascertain whether there was any criminal or malign intent. The previous...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1847
House
House of Lords

My Lords, yesterday, the Secretary of State for Defence described the super-injunction as

“unprecedented, uncomfortable and, in many ways, unconscionable

”. —[Official Report, Commons, 15/7/25; col. 160.]

Given that, does the Minister agree that if, in the future, super-injunctions are sought, or their renewal is sought, the application will be made only with...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1847
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Viscount, with his legal understanding and background, makes an interesting point. I cannot confirm whether that would be the right process and way forward but it is certainly something that should be thought about and considered. I will ensure that that suggestion is put into the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1847
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend and Min AF for their briefing to me yesterday in my role as chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee. At that briefing, Min AF said that Defence Intelligence undertook an assessment of those individuals who were at risk. We now know from...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1847
House
House of Lords

My noble friend, as chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee, points to its important role. I would think that every report should be made available to the committee, given that it was set up specifically to give parliamentary scrutiny to difficult intelligence decisions, but under the protection of the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1848
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are those in the other place who are spreading misinformation about the nature of the checks that were undertaken for those coming from Afghanistan to the United Kingdom. It is in the Statement, but it would be helpful for the House—and the public—if the Minister could reassure...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1848
House
House of Lords

Indeed. Under both the previous Government and this Government, the fact that you are deemed eligible with respect to the Afghan resettlement programme does not mean that you do not have security checks made upon you. Let me be clear: that is for everybody who is said to be eligible...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1848
House
House of Lords

I think noble Lords in this House would agree that the last Government and this Government acted properly in handling this, in every

substantive respect. Unfortunately, that is not how this case, at least in part, is being presented in the media. Part of the media is still presenting this...

Member
Lord Tyrie (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1848
House
House of Lords

As I said to the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, and others, the last Government acted in good faith in a way that they believed would protect people who had been put at risk by the data breach. They also went to the court for an injunction. The court itself granted...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1849
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the logic behind the basic injunction to protect these vulnerable people in the wake of a catastrophic data breach is understandable and the application is laudable; the super-injunction is less so. Is my noble friend the Minister able to open up a little more? Has he been briefed...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1849
House
House of Lords

I understand my noble friend’s point. I respond with trepidation, because I do not want to get into a legal discussion with her, as her legal knowledge is far greater than mine.

My understanding was that the previous Government asked for an injunction and then the court decided, on the basis...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1849-1850
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1850
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Dobbs (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1850
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Harries of Pentregarth (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1850
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I am sure the Minister is aware, there are a number of Afghans who are on the run from the Taliban, some of them in Pakistan, terrified about being sent back. The Taliban threatened to hunt down any woman who had played a public role. Could the...

Member
Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1850
House
House of Lords

We are trying to contact anybody on the list, whether they are in Afghanistan or Pakistan, who has been designated eligible for the scheme, to ensure that they understand that we will honour the commitment we have made to them. Whether they are in Pakistan or in any other country,...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1850
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I say, if I might, how encouraging it is that the Government are working so closely with the Opposition on this issue. It helps increase respect for and trust in the British political system. It was absolutely right that there should have been a super-injunction. My question is...

Member
Lord Harries of Pentregarth (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1850
House
House of Lords

We will keep everything under review and look to see what the consequences of the decision we have made are. Following on from what the noble Baroness said about women in Pakistan, our initial focus is to try to ensure that, for everybody who is eligible for the various schemes,...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1850
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not know whether my question is for my noble friend the Minister or for the party opposite. While I can totally understand why an injunction was sought to protect the content of the leak and to protect lives, I would like to understand—perhaps my noble friend...

Member
Baroness O'Grady of Upper Holloway (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1851
House
House of Lords

It is difficult for me to comment exactly on the motivation of the last Government, although I believe they acted in good faith. If I put myself in their position, I think the motivation behind the injunction would be to protect not only the names but the fact that the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1851
House
House of Lords

I am afraid I am a little less sanguine about some of this than others. This catastrophic cock-up—and it was a cock-up, not a criminal event—is a direct consequence of us getting involved in a war in which we should never have got involved in the first place, which we...

Member
Lord Dobbs (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1851
House
House of Lords

I think that we all need to learn lessons from anything that has happened in our history, whatever steps or decisions have been taken. The only thing I would say is that non-decisions and not doing anything also have consequences. It is about balance, and that is a debate and...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1851
House
House of Lords

My Lords, further to the point raised earlier by a noble Lord opposite about the lies, misinformation and fake news being spread, let us not pussyfoot around: it is by Nigel Farage and other members of Reform UK. Can the Minister confirm that this could actually put some of the...

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1851
House
House of Lords

My noble friend makes a really good point. Let us be clear: these are people who stood with us, fought with us and, in many cases, died with us. I think that the British public understand and welcome that.

By the end of this scheme, some 56,000 applicants under ARAP, plus...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
847 c1852
House
House of Lords

Statement on Afghanistan.

Lead member
John Healey
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 cc149-169
House
House of Commons

With permission, Mr Speaker, I wish to make a statement on a significant data protection breach from February 2022 relating to the Afghan relocations and assistance policy. It led to the High Court granting an unprecedented super-injunction and the previous Government establishing a secret Afghan resettlement route. Today I am...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 cc149-152
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Secretary of State for advance sight of his statement and for receipt earlier this morning of a hard copy of the Rimmer review. I also thank the Secretary of State and the Minister for the Armed Forces for briefing me yesterday and other parliamentary colleagues...

Member
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 cc152-4
House
House of Commons

I welcome the tone in which the shadow Defence Secretary has responded, and I welcome his joining me in the apology on behalf of the British Government to those whose data has been compromised. I also welcome his acceptance that, as he put it, it was “entirely appropriate” for the...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c154
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for advance sight of his statement. Although I welcome it and his intent to inject parliamentary transparency and scrutiny, this whole data breach is a mess and wholly unacceptable. As I mentioned to the Minister for the Armed Forces during our recent secret briefing,...

Member
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 cc154-5
House
House of Commons

I can only recommend that my hon. Friend reads in full the public version of the Rimmer report, which I have published today. Rimmer sets out conclusions and an updated risk assessment, taking an up-to-date view, recognising that the situation in Afghanistan is nearly four years on from the point...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c155
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for the Armed Forces for his briefing on this issue this morning.

I am pleased this House now has the opportunity to scrutinise this alarming data breach. It was right that the then Government moved to introduce a new scheme to try to minimise the risk to...

Member
Helen Maguire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c155
House
House of Commons

I welcome the hon. Lady’s response. I provided the answers to two or three of her questions directly to the shadow Defence Secretary. On the steps we have taken to ensure the reduced risk of data losses and data breaches in future, one can never say never but I am...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c156
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the ministerial team for my early briefing, which gave me an opportunity to read a Foreign Affairs Committee report that came out—it was begun in September 2021—in 2022 under the chairmanship of the right hon. Member for Tonbridge (Tom Tugendhat). It is called “Missing in action:...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c156
House
House of Commons

I am sure Ministers will report to my right hon. Friend’s Committee if she invites us to do so. She is right to make the big argument that anyone providing data to the British Government has a right to expect that personal data to be stored securely, handled safely and...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c156
House
House of Commons

I commend the Secretary of State for his honesty and I agree with everything he says in his statement. What an appalling mess, but part of the original sin was our intervening militarily and then scuttling out. On a wider point, may I take it that we have learnt our...

Member
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c156
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for his remarks. I am certainly grateful for his support for my statement this afternoon. Although he has not said it, he is a big champion of press freedom and I expect that he also recognises that an important part of our...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c157
House
House of Commons

As a veteran of the war in Afghanistan, I was appalled to watch the chaotic mismanagement following the fall of Kabul that left Afghans who served alongside our troops and who worked so hard for a better Afghanistan, dangerously exposed. This was a situation that I feared would happen and...

Member
Louise Sandher-Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c157
House
House of Commons