Skip to main content

1-50 of 2,305 results for subject:Injunctions

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (11) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (5) + Public bills (5)
-
Government bills (4)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (4)
-
Statutory instruments (4)
+ Members' contributions (1,991)
-
Business questions (4)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (32)
+ Oral questions (34)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,924)
-
Speaker's rulings (1)
+ Parliamentary committees (70) + Committee proceedings (61)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (22)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (22)
-
Select Committee reports (6)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (2)
-
Select Committee written evidence (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (55)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Deposited papers (15)
-
House of Commons papers (27)
-
House of Lords papers (6)
-
Impact assessments (4)
-
Unprinted papers (3)
-
White papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (117) + Debates (87)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (61)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (22)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (22)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (58)
-
Debates on bills (53)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (5)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (26) + Oral statements (6)
-
Ministerial statements (5)
-
Personal statements (1)
-
Written statements (20)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (179)
-
Business questions (4)
+ Oral questions (34)
-
Prime Minister's questions (3)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (138)
+ Research briefings (13)
-
Commons Briefing papers (8)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Levitt
Answering member
Lord Keen of Elie
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 cc440-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin with a brief explanation of what this instrument is not. It is not a mechanism for extending legal aid, and it does not represent a change to legal aid policy. It does not introduce any new pressure on legal aid, and thus we do not expect...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 cc440-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for laying this instrument. We on these Benches support the order. As the Minister explained, this is a largely technical instrument. It ensures that legal aid continues to be available where new civil orders introduced by the Crime and Policing Act replace or mirror...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 cc442-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Keen of Elie, for welcoming this statutory instrument. The answer to his question on the legal aid agencies is yes; we are ready for that. This instrument, as the noble and learned Lord said, is a necessary step...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 c443GC
House
House of Lords

Local agencies have various powers to respond to anti-social behaviour. These powers are being strengthened by the Crime and Policing Act 2026.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
23 June 2026
Reference
CBP-7270
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
19 May 2026
Reference
HC 69 2026-27
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
HC 1304 2024-26
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
HC 1304 2024-26
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether the Government has considered establishing periodic review procedures for High Court injunctions granting lifelong anonymity to offenders convicted of serious crimes committed as juveniles.

Asked by
Andrew Snowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 March 2026
Reference
118304
House
House of Commons

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 1 disagreed to on division (86 to 178). Amendment 4 agreed to. Amendment 7 agreed to on division (205 to 188). Amendment 11 agreed to. Amendment 13 agreed to on division (213 to 150). Amendments 15 to 17 agreed to. Amendment 18 disagreed to...

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint; Lord Katz
Answering member
Lord Davies of Gower; Lord Cameron of Lochiel
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland legislative consent granted, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc612-660
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Doocey

1: Clause 1, page 2, line 4, leave out “just and convenient” and insert “necessary and proportionate”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment amends the test for imposing a respect order to require the court to be satisfied that it is necessary and proportionate to make the order for the purpose...

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c612
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to the House; I was not ready, but it is worth waiting for. This amendment would change the legal test for imposing a respect order, requiring the court to consider this step “necessary and proportionate”, and not merely “just and convenient”, in preventing a person engaging...

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc612-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with everything said by the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey. As I understand the Government’s position, they accept that it would not be appropriate to impose such an order unless it is necessary and proportionate, and indeed that is the test applied by the European Convention on...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c613
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is a lot in this group. The Government are undoubtedly sincere in wanting to use the Bill to further tackle anti-social behaviour, and such moves to take on this blight on communities will certainly be popular. However, we have to pause a moment and say that there...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc614-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to the amendment tabled in my name. As noble Lords know, I am terrible with the billion rules that we have in this place, so bear with me. This amendment would make a small change that would make a big difference to many residents around...

Member
Lord Bailey of Paddington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c617
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to the amendments in my noble friend Lady Doocey’s name and mine, which seek to ensure that the Government’s new anti-social behaviour powers are grounded in evidence, proportionality and democratic accountability, as well as to other amendments in this group.

On these Benches, we do not...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc617-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it will come as no surprise to the Minister that these Benches maintain our opposition to the Government’s respect orders. We have heard, in Committee and today, many concerns about the new regime. Our concerns are slightly different from some of those expressed by other noble Lords, in...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc619-620
House
House of Lords

It is good to be back, is it not? It feels like we have been away for ages and now here we are again, back for another session of interesting amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. I am grateful to all noble Lords for tabling them.

As the noble Lord,...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc620-1
House
House of Lords

Would the Minister accept that it is very difficult ever to think of circumstances in which it would be appropriate for a court to impose a respect order, with all the implications that has for an individual, unless the court is satisfied that it is necessary and proportionate?

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c621
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has made his point. I am trying to give the defence from the Government’s perspective. That is our view. He has made a reasonable point, but that is our view and I hope he accepts our comments on those issues in good faith.

On Amendment 2, I hope...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc621-3
House
House of Lords

I rise just to clarify and to help the Minister. I would not want in any way to stop the Government implementing their manifesto promises. The aim of the review was not to stop respect orders; it was to suggest that the anti-social behaviour on the statute book was reviewed...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c622
House
House of Lords

I am always grateful for the noble Baroness’s help on these matters. It is as rare as hen’s teeth normally, but I am always grateful. I still say to her that the implementation of respect orders is crucial to ensuring that we tackle anti-social behaviour effectively. I put it to...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc622-4
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister. Nobody doubts or questions that addressing anti-social behaviour is a manifesto commitment; that is taken as read. However, if it is a manifesto commitment, it must be put in words that clearly describe what the Government are trying to say. I find it...

Member
Lord Sentamu (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c624
House
House of Lords

As ever, I am genuinely sorry that I have not been able to persuade the noble and right reverend Lord of the Government’s case. We have taken the view that “just and convenient” mirrors the civil injunction regime of the 2014 Act, passed by a Conservative and Liberal Democrat Government....

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c625
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I remain unpersuaded. The Minister keeps mentioning the manifesto commitment, but the manifesto makes no mention of the liability threshold for a respect order, so it is surely perfectly legitimate to question the basis on which the respect order the Government are introducing is based.

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c625
House
House of Lords

The basis on which the respect order is introduced, and the phraseology used, is the phraseology his and His Majesty’s Opposition’s Government put in place for previous orders. I am not changing the wording of anything that, presumably, at some point in 2014 he and other Liberal Democrat Peers walked...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c625
House
House of Lords

Actually, I did not.

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c625
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has got me there. Let me rephrase my challenge. The noble Lord did not support it, but the coalition Government he supported passed the 2014 Act. I like to be accurate in my barbs at noble Lords, and I hope that accuracy persuades him that, even if...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c625
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as a final throw, I wonder whether the Minister remembers how the Labour Benches voted in respect of those orders at the time.

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c625
House
House of Lords

It was 12 years ago. Although I was a Member of the House of Commons at the time, I would probably have done whatever my noble friend the then Chief Whip asked me to do.

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c626
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken, and I am very grateful for all the support that I got. I am disappointed, but not at all surprised, by the Minister’s response because, in my experience, the Minister is good at listening but not particularly good at hearing....

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c626
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Hanson of Flint

4: Clause 1, page 9, line 33, at end insert—

“(2A) Before issuing or revising guidance under this section, the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.

(2B) Subsection (2A) does not apply to revisions that the Secretary of State considers...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c626
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

7: Clause 4, page 12, line 11, at end insert—

“(5) For the purposes of this section, any authorised person or company issuing fixed penalty notices under the provisions listed in subsection (6) must not receive, directly or indirectly, any financial benefit that is contingent upon—

(a) the issuing of...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc626-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am afraid that it is no cigar again for the Minister on this amendment. On his promise of consultation on statutory guidance and so on on the question of fining for profit, I really do not think that is going to cut the mustard. On these Benches,...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c629
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Russell of Liverpool

8: Clause 6, page 12, line 18, at end insert—

“(1A) Section 104 (review of response to complaints about anti-social behaviour) is amended as follows.

(1B) In subsection (2)(b), after “published” insert “in their entirety”.

(1C) After subsection (2) insert—

“(2A) The relevant bodies in each local government area have...

Member
Lord Russell of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c629
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 8, 9 and 10 in my name, to which the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, who is outside the Chamber at the moment—I think she is talking to the other Minister—has kindly added her name. I thank the Minister and his officials for the...

Member
Lord Russell of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc629-635
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I signed the amendments in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Russell. He spoke eloquently to the detail and, indeed, during the debate that we had in Committee on them. I want just to summarise the key reasons.

We understand why the Government want to see their guidance...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c635
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Russell of Liverpool, for his work on these amendments, and the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, for her contribution to the debates on anti-social behaviour reviews, both today and in Committee. It is an important issue that touches on how our system responds...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc635-6
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Russell of Liverpool, for his amendments, and for the opportunity to meet and discuss them in person. I am also acutely aware that he developed and examined the amendments with the late Baroness Newlove, to whom I again pay tribute, and with...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc636-7
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his response, which was much as anticipated—so no surprises. I think we all understand the underlying issues and some of the bad things that victims are currently experiencing.

These three amendments come from a period during which the Victims’ Commissioner office has been scrutinising in detail...

Member
Lord Russell of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc637-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Katz

11: Clause 7, page 16, line 28, at end insert—

“(6A) The requirement in subsection (6) may be satisfied by consultation carried out wholly or partly before this section comes into force.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment to section 105A of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (inserted by...

Member
Lord Katz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c638
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government’s amendments in this group all relate to certain of the delegated powers in the Bill. In the main, they respond to recommendations made by the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee and the Constitution Committee in their

reports on the Bill. I am very grateful to...

Member
Lord Katz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc638-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have come to the first of two groups containing a large number of government amendments. I find myself having to express my strong frustration and disappointment with the number of government amendments that have been brought to this Bill on Report. As we broke up for recess,...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc639-640
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful, to an extent, for the comments from the noble Lord, Lord Davies of Gower. The vast majority of the Government amendments that have been laid before your Lordships’ House are either in response to issues raised through discussion in Committee, or subsequent to that discussion,...

Member
Lord Katz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c640
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Davies of Gower

13: Clause 9, page 17, line 27, at end insert—

“(1A) The guidance issued about the enforcement of offences under section 33 must ensure that, where a person is convicted of a relevant offence, they are liable for the costs incurred through loss or damage resulting from...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc597-600
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment in my name relates to fly-tipping and measures that can and should be taken to combat it. Fly-tipping is a serious and growing blight on society. In 2023-24 local authorities in England had to contend with approximately 1.15 million fly-tipping and litter incidents, an increase of...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc600-642
House
House of Lords

Tabled by

Viscount Goschen

14: At end insert—

“(1C) The guidance must specify that reasonable measures under subsection (1B) include requiring the waste collection authority to collect all waste resulting from the offence.”

Member
Viscount Goschen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc642-605
House
House of Lords

I do not wish to move the amendment.

Member
Viscount Goschen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c605
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not think it inappropriate that, although Amendment 14 was not moved, it should be spoken to.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c606
House
House of Lords

For the administrative ease of the House, I have not moved Amendment 14, but I do have another amendment in this group, Amendment 21, which I do intend to talk to, if that is in order.

Member
Viscount Goschen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c608
House
House of Lords