Skip to main content

1-20 of 236 results for member:"Baroness Byford"

Subject X
Wildlife

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Wildlife (236)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I am pleased to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Mallalieu. I totally agree with some of the things she said. There is a movement gathering pace against using livestock for entertainment in a way that has traditionally gone on in the countryside, and I accept that. There is...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 June 2019
Reference
798 cc790-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to follow up on the figures the Minister has given us. I apologise that I could not take part in Second Reading, but I am listening very carefully to the debate today. If I heard him correctly, he said that 31% of exports within the EU...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2018
Reference
792 c2129
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by declaring my farming and other interests as listed in the register. The 25-year environment plan is long awaited and I for one am very glad that the farming and environment plans have been merged into one document. I am grateful to the Minister for introducing...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2018
Reference
788 cc1300-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should perhaps declare an interest as a farmer in Suffolk. I do not think that we use any irrigation on our crops because the land is pretty heavy and wet—but I will correct that in the future if I am wrong.

Tonight is a slightly odd circumstance for...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
788 cc516-7
House
House of Lords

Indeed, but the clause could still be used for the same purpose. That, however, is a minor point, to which we shall return. The noble Baroness said that compulsory purchase has not been used, but that does not stop it being used in the future. We need to ensure that...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
718 c577GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support my noble friend’s opposition to the clause not standing part. I speak perhaps on behalf of all those who increasingly try to grow their own food. As the Minister knows very well, even this Government—some of us might say belatedly—have come to recognise that food security...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
718 c566-7GC
House
House of Lords

Will it be a formal consultation or just an informal discussion?

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
718 c568GC
House
House of Lords

I hope that I have not missed an answer on this point. One of the concerns expressed earlier was that in certain areas water companies might deal with these issues in different ways—in other words, water company A could be much more sympathetic than water company B. I was not...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
718 c590GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Minister responds, I, too, should like to support my noble friend on this very important amendment. I go back to the contribution made by the noble Baroness, Lady Young of Old Scone, who said that, on the whole, the powers in the clause would not enable...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
718 c576GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not repeat what my noble friend has so clearly said, but the issue has been raised with me on several occasions. One such provision in particular, if it were so moved, would affect a wildlife sanctuary, which is clearly undesirable. I hope that the Minister will...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c26
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before my noble friend does that, perhaps I can ask the Minister a question. He explained quite rightly that this matter will go out to consultation. However, if for any reason that consultation comes down against the person regarding his land or a business operating on it, no...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c28-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Minister clarify an issue for me? When in the south-west, for example, a coastline route is already agreed, I presume that it is not within the Government’s thinking that they will alter that route, unless it is due to erosion, and that the existing lines to...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c24
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Mallalieu, for bringing her amendments back. I apologise that I was not able to put my name to them—I did not think that I would be here in time—but I am gratified that the Government are moving Amendment 124T, which will help...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c20-1
House
House of Lords

Amendment A357BA A357BA: Clause 292, page 181, line 44, at end insert— "55EA Compensation for loss caused by coastal access (1) Subject to the following provisions of this section, if, on a claim made in accordance with this section, it is shown that the value of an interest of any...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2009
Reference
709 c1462
House
House of Lords

Perhaps that covers compensation. Clearly, it is always a difficult situation when one accepts the interests of the majority against the minority person who might be the owner or the occupier, or might have a business on what is likely to be coastal access land. I am grateful to the...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2009
Reference
709 c1464
House
House of Lords

I apologise for my late arrival; unfortunately, I could not get here earlier. My Amendment A289A is a simple probing amendment. The use of the indefinite article suggests that the Government feel there may be more than one case. If this is so, will the Minister explain the Government’s thinking?...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2009
Reference
709 c1379
House
House of Lords

Briefly, I support my noble friend’s Amendment A357B on changes in land use. The noble Lord, Lord Cameron, is right that farmers, landowners and others continuously look to develop their land to bring in additional income. I would cite another example. Last week we stayed at the Nare Hotel, near...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2009
Reference
709 c1398
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend for raising the issue because the internet is still not a possibility in many rural areas. I am grateful to the Minister for responding to the point in my amendment on the use of "a" and "the". When we debated the Bill before...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2009
Reference
709 c1382
House
House of Lords

I rise to speak to my Amendment 319A, which is in this group and is a probing amendment. As I read Clause 291(7) on page 177 of the Bill, it looks as though there might be a conflict of interest, and I seek clarification on that. It seems to imply...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2009
Reference
709 c1412
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his explanation. Surely that would be true of all coastal access throughout the Bill, yet only this bit is specifically worded in this way. I do not think that I am wrong about that.

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2009
Reference
709 c1415
House
House of Lords