Skip to main content

1-20 of 521 results for subject:"Labour market"

Subject X
Unemployed people

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Unemployed people (521)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
European Union Committee
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
HL 92 2009-10
House
House of Lords
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c343-404GC
House
House of Lords

This has been an important debate. In responding, I will have the opportunity to put on the record and try to allay some of the fears of most noble Lords who have spoken, with the exception of the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, the noble Baronesses, Lady Turner, Lady Meacher and...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c399-401GC
House
House of Lords

I understand that not unreasonable point. We need to see where the carers’ strategy is heading. It is fair to say that people may be switched off from claiming just by the title, but I am sure that there are ways in which we can address that. On balance, we...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c401GC
House
House of Lords

I am not sure whether the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, intended the amendment to be a precursor to our debates very shortly—perhaps not that shortly—on drug and alcohol abuse. However, I take the view that even if the amendment covers that situation, it is unintentional and she wants to stick...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c392-3GC
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Lord consider a straightforward example? A plumber with osteoarthritis of the knee can no longer work as a plumber because of deterioration, but can really be cured only by having a knee replacement. For all kinds of other reasons, he may have decided that a knee replacement...

Member
Baroness Murphy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c393GC
House
House of Lords

No, we do not.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c358GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister probably cannot tell me now—I suspect that this has still to be determined, so he would not be in a position to do so—but would he write giving me some details? He mentioned 10 to 12 pathfinders. What proportion of lone parents will be encompassed within those pathfinders?...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c359GC
House
House of Lords

I think perhaps I have explained myself rather badly. I am interested not in the result of the pathfinders but in the effect on the individual who has been working for six months of the two years, say, or even the full two years. When she comes to the end...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c359GC
House
House of Lords

I strongly support the amendment, particularly because it raises a fundamental principle: do we or do we not believe that parents are responsible for procuring or providing the education for their child? I also support it because it is a specific example of the general principle enshrined in the amendment...

Member
Lord Northbourne (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c362GC
House
House of Lords

My amendment coming after that of the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, must seem terribly badly drafted, and indeed, it is. This is strange territory for me. Education is where home educators and I belong. I have drifted into this because of the Badman review and how home education is being...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c360-2GC
House
House of Lords

So that would be about one-third or so of the total eligible lone parent population. I would be grateful if my noble friend could write with the details but, in the light of that, I shall reflect on what he has said and see whether there is any way in...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c360GC
House
House of Lords

I rise to dip my toe into the Welfare Reform Bill in front of my far more experienced Peers, but that is the lot of the lowly Whip. We have had a good, wide-ranging and useful debate on the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Lucas. I begin by...

Member
Baroness Crawley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c364-6GC
House
House of Lords

I would be delighted if we came back to this, but it is because those excluded children are within the state system and the home-educated children cannot be in the same category because home education is a choice.

Member
Baroness Crawley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c366GC
House
House of Lords

Clause 3: Work-related activity: income support claimants and partners of claimants Amendment 74A 74A: Clause 3, page 10, line 17, at end insert— "(8) Regulations made under subsection (4)(c) shall include any person with dependant children who has claimed benefit in the previous three months where he has left and...

Member
Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c367GC
House
House of Lords

I am going back to training. The Minister has said that jobcentre staff will use their discretion in these cases. They will have to be extremely sensitive to understand what women go through when they are badly treated by their husbands or partners. It is not in the experience of...

Member
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c373GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas, for moving this important amendment. I am pleased that my noble friend Lady Kennedy was able to make our proceedings, despite the pressing issues that she has to deal with. I acknowledge my noble friend’s long-standing expertise and commitment in this area and...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c372-3GC
House
House of Lords

I acknowledge that the training and understanding of advisers is key in this issue, as in so much of what we have debated so far during the passage of the Bill. In relation to the existing JSA regime and the progression-to-work model, we believe it will be necessary further to...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c374GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may also throw in a question for my noble friend. When contact is made with a woman and, as a result of the situation she is exposed to, she asks for this discretion, how often does he expect the personal adviser to grant it? If it is to...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c373-4GC
House
House of Lords

Amendment 75 75: After Clause 3, insert the following new Clause— "Jobseeker’s allowance sanction regime where suitable childcare is not available (1) The Jobseekers Act 1995 (c. 18) is amended as follows. (2) In section 20 (exemptions from section 19), after subsection (1), insert— "(1A) Nothing in section 19, or...

Member
Baroness Meacher (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2009
Reference
711 c376GC
House
House of Lords