Skip to main content

1-20 of 209 results for subject:"Planning authorities"

Subject X
Training

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Training (209)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
HC 1781 2024-26
House
House of Commons

Lords report stage second day. Division on Amendment 47 called. Tellers for the contents were not appointed, so the Division could not proceed. Amendment 47 disagreed to, in accordance with Standing Order 52(2). Amendments 49 and 51 agreed to. Amendment 55 agreed to on division (228 to 113). Amendment 56...

Lead member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill; Baroness Taylor of Stevenage
Answering member
Lord Blencathra; Baroness Scott of Bybrook; Lord Jamieson; Lord Moylan; Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay
Department
Department for Transport; Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Scottish legislative consent granted, Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 cc757-804
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Moylan

47: Clause 33, page 48, line 39, leave out “possession or”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment is intended to remove the Secretary of State’s right to compulsorily acquire possession of highway land.

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 47 relates to Clause 33. We debated this in Committee at some length, but the result of that debate was not in any sense satisfactory from my point of view. I wish to take this opportunity to express my thanks for the letter written to me by...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 cc757-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is a good start to today’s debate. It is a rather arcane topic with which to start the day. I wondered, when I listened carefully to the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, whether he had actually read the original section in the Highways Act 1980, which the Government...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c759
House
House of Lords

I assure the noble Baroness that I have done so.

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c759
House
House of Lords

Excellent. I am pleased that he has, though I wonder whether he has, therefore, understood it. It is surprising that he has chosen to create legal uncertainty, which is what would happen with his amendment. Its consequence appears to be that developers needing a temporary use of land have in...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c759
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, for the amendment, which seeks to remove the Secretary of State’s ability to grant powers to an acquiring authority to compulsorily possess land necessary to facilitate delivery of highway schemes. The purpose of the measure is to allow acquiring authorities to...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 cc759-760
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the Minister’s comments. However, I thought I asked some fairly precise questions, and I do not feel that he has

answered the questions with the precision that I was hoping for. Therefore, at the appropriate moment, I will seek to test the opinion of...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c760
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Pinnock

48: Clause 41, page 54, line 22, at end insert—

“(1A) Any disapplication of heritage protections under this section must be exercised in a manner that—

(a) recognises the value of the United Kingdom’s archaeological and architectural heritage to the nation and to local communities;

(b) respects the principle that structures...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c761
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is one area in the Bill where the Government have listened and made significant concessions in the light of the debate in Committee. In Committee, the amendment in my name and that of the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett of Manor Castle, challenged the Government to think again...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c761
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak in place of my noble friend Lady Bennett of Manor Castle. She is unable to be here today as she is hosting something that was set up months ago. As a former archaeologist, I am so annoyed by the Government’s attempt to do this. In fact,...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c762
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I tabled my Amendment 50 before the Government tabled their own Amendment 49 in this group. Both seek, as the noble Baroness, Lady Pinnock, said, to leave out Clause 41. It is fair to say that that was the part of the Bill that caused the most concern...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c762
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am in the rather frightening position of agreeing with Amendment 48 in the names of the noble Baronesses, Lady Pinnock and Lady Bennett of Manor Castle—no doubt they are as concerned about my support for them as I am. However, they have raised some very good points...

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 cc762-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot resist a brief anecdote. When the inner ring road was being built around Birmingham’s city centre in the 1960s, the highways department at Birmingham City Council approached the Catholic Archbishop of Birmingham and said that, unfortunately, both the Pugin-designed Catholic cathedral and the Pugin-designed archbishop’s House...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c764
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in speaking to Amendments 48 and 50, I shall later move government Amendments 49, 51, 66, 258 and 260. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Parkinson, and the noble Baronesses, Lady Pinnock and Lady Bennett, as well as the other noble Lords who have raised this issue during...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 cc764-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for the long discussion that we had on this issue during recess and her commitment then to introduce a new clause. In my view, she has responded appropriately and fully to the concerns expressed. With those safeguards for our heritage, I beg leave to...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c765
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage

49: Leave out Clause 41 and insert the following new Clause—

“Deemed grant of listed building consent etc

(1) In the Transport and Works Act 1992, for section 17 (listed buildings and conservation areas) substitute—

“17 Listed buildings: England

(1) On making an order under section 1 or 3 that...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 cc765-7
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage

51: Leave out Schedule 2

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment is consequential on my amendment replacing Clause 41.

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c767
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Pidgeon

52: Clause 47, page 59, line 18, at end insert—

“(5A) After subsection (5), insert—

“(6) References in this Part to public charge points are to be taken as including cross-pavement charging solutions.””

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
849 c767
House
House of Lords