Skip to main content

1-20 of 364 results for subject:Storage

Subject X
Tax rates and bands

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Tax rates and bands (364)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

rose—

Member
Brandon Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c790
House
House of Commons

I give way to my hon. Friend the Member for Kingston upon Hull North (Diana Johnson), who wanted to intervene earlier.

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c790
House
House of Commons

I would not say that the industry is “delighted.” I think that it accepts the measure, on the basis that it was very concerned about the 20% figure. My concern as a constituency MP, with 90% of static caravans being built in Hull and the surrounding area, is that there...

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c790
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that rational and considered intervention and appreciate that the industry is willing to accept the change, as it is much easier to bear than the original suggestion of 20%, but that is the point I seek to make. The Minister in his opening remarks...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 cc790-1
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for her generosity in giving way. In Great Yarmouth, I represent a £500-million-a-year tourism industry, with about 50% of our bed space in static caravans. Our industry was concerned, but its message to me is that it thinks the 5% rate is not only fair,...

Member
Brandon Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c791
House
House of Commons

The only point I can make is that the industry suffered the serious blow of having a 20% tax announced. That has been reduced to 5%, which it will obviously welcome, but we propose to remove the VAT changes altogether, because at this particular time the last thing that any...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c791
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend share my astonishment at the previous intervention? If the proposal to impose that VAT rate had never been made, there would have been no need for consultation or listening—and it would have been far better to have consulted first. What happened to the notion of a...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c791
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend speaks a lot of sense and makes her point very forcefully. The Government seem to have tax-grabbed first and consulted later. They have sneaked through changes—the ones they have got away with, they have pocketed and the ones they have been seriously challenged on, particularly by their...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c791
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend as confused as I am by Government Members saying that their local manufacturers were asking for a 5% increase and demanding to be charged VAT? That is what it sounds like.

5.30 pm

Member
Julie Hilling (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 cc791-2
House
House of Commons

I made that very point when I expressed surprise at the impression being given that the static caravan industry warmly embraces and welcomes the change. A more rational description is that the industry accepts it as a much better deal than the one they were originally given by the Government—a...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 cc792-4
House
House of Commons

On haircuts, I wonder whether the increase in VAT in the case of hairdressers will precipitate a return to hairstyles such as the one that I currently sport.

Member
Steve Rotheram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c794
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend read my mind as I gazed across the Chamber.

Giving a tax cut to millionaires and the banks but making it harder for self-employed women and their customers reveals a Government who are, once again, truly out of touch with ordinary people’s lives. New clause 12 seeks to...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c794
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady concur that those on lower incomes pay a higher proportion of their income on fuel, and will she therefore welcome the postponement of the 3p increase in fuel duty?

Member
Jake Berry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c794
House
House of Commons

I not only welcome it but point out that we proposed it, and the Chancellor shortly followed us on the same day. Our proposal to bring about an immediate reduction in VAT to 17.5% would deliver that 3p fuel duty reduction for drivers and put money in their pockets not...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c794
House
House of Commons

Is not the real VAT bombshell the fact that the hon. Lady does not know how much this policy would cost Her Majesty’s Treasury? In the hour or so for which she has been talking, has she had any inspiration from colleagues?

Member
Stephen Gilbert (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c794
House
House of Commons

As I said, it is the Government’s job to work out the cost of any tax changes or spending commitments, and they have not even been able to provide answers as regards their own fuel duty reduction.

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c795
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Lady says that it is the Government’s job, let me tell her—I do not want to keep her in suspense —that her policy of reducing VAT to 17.5% would cost £12 billion to £13 billion a year. Does she dispute that number, and can she explain how...

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c795
House
House of Commons

If our policy turns the trajectory of the economy around from one of recession to one of growth, then clearly it will pay for itself and bring down the benefits bill, which is currently going up.

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c795
House
House of Commons

I would like clarity on what the Opposition’s policy is. [Interruption.] I can hardly hear myself think. Is it our policy that VAT will be permanently reduced to 17.5% or that the reduction will last for 12 months and then it will go back up to 20%?

5.45 pm

Member
Lord Mann (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c795
House
House of Commons

We are suggesting—we hope that the Government will jump on our way of thinking, as they did with the delay in the rise in fuel duty—an immediate reduction to 17.5% until we get the economy back into growth.

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2012
Reference
547 c795
House
House of Commons