Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,076 results for subject:Defence

Subject X
Sanctions

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Sanctions (2,076)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Foreign Affairs Committee
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
HC 109 2026-27
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
HC 338 2026-27
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment his Department has made of the risk to national security of outsourcing sensitive defence infrastructure to private sub-contractors accused of breaching sanctions against Russia.

Asked by
Luke Akehurst (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 June 2026
Reference
3634
House
House of Commons

What is the Minister’s assessment of the extra investment in defence and the extra kit that Ukraine will need as a consequence of our handing money to Putin through the relaxation of oil and gas sanctions?

Asked by
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 June 2026
Reference
786 c841
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Member will know, we are increasing sanctions on Russian oil. [Interruption.] We are increasing sanctions. I entirely appreciate that the Opposition have decided to depart from the principle of cross-party support to play party political games, but that does not stop it being true. We are increasing sanctions on Russia.

Answered by
Luke Pollard (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 June 2026
Reference
786 c841
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Foreign Affairs Committee
Date
19 May 2026
Reference
HC 108 2026-27
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on the Prime Minister's visit to China and Japan.

Lead member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Lord Privy Seal
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 cc1622-1641
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the opportunity to ask questions on a Statement by our well-travelled Prime Minister. Actually, we on this side

do not criticise the Prime Minister for travelling abroad: it is part of his job. What we do criticise is the devastating impact his policies are...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 cc1635-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these Benches believe the Government should engage internationally, and the Prime Minister likewise, to operate with allies and competitors alike. But when it comes to competitors who have been proven to also be adversaries and security risks, that engagement, if transactional, must actively de-risk.

On the Chinese risk to...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 cc1637-9
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to both noble Lords for their comments. Those from the noble Lord, Lord True, clearly underline the fundamental difference between the party opposite and us. Let us just start from where we are. The fundamental difference is that the party opposite went from a golden age of...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 cc1639-1640
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord raises a number of issues, but the bottom line is that he asks whether engagement is better than stepping away and shouting. That is the fundamental difference between us and the party opposite. The kinds of issues he raises about investment, business and trade are important, but...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1641
House
House of Lords

My Lords, given the profound uncertainty surrounding the UK’s treaty with Mauritius in respect of the Chagos Islands, can the noble Baroness the Lord Privy Seal confirm that further consideration of this Bill will not resume until the necessary amendments to the 1966 treaty—UN treaty 8737—between the UK and the...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1641
House
House of Lords

I must say to the noble Lord that I am responsible for many things, but the timing of our debates is a matter not for me but for the Chief Whip, who might not appreciate me saying what the timing could be. I will say to the noble Earl that...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1624
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as chair of the UK-Japan 21st Century Group, I warmly welcome the Prime Minister’s visit to Japan, following his visit to China and emphasise how important it is that we visit, link up with, negotiate with and do deals with our best friends, as well as those who...

Member
Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1624
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his interest and his role in this. Japan has been a valued partner and it has been a very deep relationship, for instance with £33 billion in annual trade and 150,000 jobs created. Japan is our closest security partner in Asia. On the noble...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1625
House
House of Lords

My Lords, following the issue of sanctions, in my case it is one down and three to go. I welcome the intervention that the Prime Minister made on behalf of those parliamentarians who have been sanctioned—not by China but by the Chinese Communist Party. Many of us are careful to...

Member
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 cc1626-1643
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord. He is absolutely right: in every circumstance, sanctions are wrong. I am myself sanctioned —not by the Chinese Communist Party but by Russia—as are a number of Members of this House.

The noble Lord raised Hong Kong as well. The Prime Minister was candid...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1643
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can the noble Baroness the Leader of the House assure us that the candid robustness of the Prime Minister on Hong Kong included giving the very firm message to Beijing that no return visit by President Xi could be considered while Jimmy Lai is still imprisoned in Hong...

Member
Baroness Ludford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1643
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government will do everything in their power to ensure that Jimmy Lai does not die in prison. No one wants to see that, and I am surprised that the noble Baroness raised it in those terms. We want to secure Jimmy Lai’s release. She asked about a...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1643
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend for addressing this important Statement. I draw you Lordships’ House’s attention to my entries in the register of interests, particularly my role as vice-chair of the Nuclear Threat Initiative. Ministers routinely refuse to answer questions in Parliament about nuclear weapons, often citing the...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 cc1629-1644
House
House of Lords