Skip to main content

1-20 of 200 results for subject:Ofwat

Subject X
Recycling

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Recycling (200)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

I am delighted to present a Bill that reflects my twin priorities of growing the economy and improving the environment. The Bill will promote growth for the long term, improve the resilience of our water supplies and the...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c47
House
House of Commons

Given that the Secretary of State says that the Bill is designed to protect the environment, will he agree to amend the Bill to require fracking companies to have a full liability guarantee to cover a range of eventualities before an environmental permit is allocated? He will know that even...

Member
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c47
House
House of Commons

On the issue of fracking, I have made it absolutely clear that we will in no way dilute or diminish any of the existing regulations relating to the extraction of hydrocarbons from underground. A whole framework of different regulations is already laid down by European legislation, and we intend to...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c47
House
House of Commons

My constituency has a place called Barton Moss, which is to be explored for shale gas. It is next to a raised peat bog, which is one of the rarest and most precious resources in the country that has not been ruined by over-extraction. There are real concerns among my...

Member
Baroness Keeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c47
House
House of Commons

I have sympathy with the hon. Lady’s question; I have mosses in my own constituency. Let me reassure her that there is absolutely no intention to dilute or reduce in any way the rigour of our environmental

regulation. I also remind her that on a visit to Washington, I spoke...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c47
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Baroness Keeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c48
House
House of Commons

I hope that the hon. Lady will not mind if I carry on, as the debate is about the Water Bill rather than fracking.

Earlier this year, we announced that the Bill would also include measures to deal with the availability and affordability of flood insurance. That is an important issue...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c48
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend will know, as a fellow Shropshire MP, that there is significant flooding in areas such as Shifnal and Albrighton in the east of the county in my constituency. What discussions has he had with the Association of British Insurers to ensure that people have access to...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c48
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend and neighbour for his question. I shall come on to that in a minute, but we have had exhaustive and extensive discussions with the ABI to ensure that the statement of principles is succeeded by a new regime, on which I shall elaborate...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c48
House
House of Commons

As somebody who strongly welcomes the introduction of competition, why will not the Secretary of State allow competition for everybody? If it is really a natural monopoly, nothing will happen and no harm will be done, but if it is not, we could all get the benefit of competition with...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c48
House
House of Commons

As my right hon. Friend knows, I have total sympathy with that position. I am quite clear that as an aspiration universal competition is worth while. Our problem is that we want to take the first step and take the wholesale route, which will bring immediate benefits and real efficiencies...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 cc48-9
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State will know that there has obviously been general support for a clean Thames, but the proposals for the Thames tunnel are still controversial. Will he update the House on whether the Government have concluded their discussions and negotiations with Thames Water about the mechanism to ensure,...

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c49
House
House of Commons

I am fully aware that that is a matter of enormous interest to the right hon. Gentleman and his constituents. To put it bluntly, it is not acceptable that we continue to put 20 million tonnes of untreated sewage in the Thames every year. We have considered a range of...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c49
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend says that we are going to improve the nation’s ability to capture and store water, thereby reducing abstraction. Will he be telling us later in his speech where the new reservoirs are to be built?

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c49
House
House of Commons

I will be moving on to that. I cannot tell my hon. Friend exactly where the new reservoirs will be because that will be down to the individual companies, according to local circumstances, but I can categorically assure him that I hope that the measures in the Bill will release...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 cc49-50
House
House of Commons

I am fully aware that in the south-west we have significantly higher water rates—probably the highest in the country. The Government have noted that and uniquely have given customers of South West Water £50. Does my right hon. Friend think that competition will drive down bills in the south-west as...

Member
Oliver Colvile (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c50
House
House of Commons

I have no doubt at all that we want more efficient water companies with more investment, which undoubtedly will lead to a cheaper product.

We are already seeing the first signs of a competitive market. In September, to answer my hon. Friend’s question directly, First Milk became the first multi-site customer...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c50
House
House of Commons

I take the right hon. Gentleman’s point about expanding the market and the smaller companies. However, the Canal & River Trust, a body supported on both sides of the House, is concerned that clause 12 will impact negatively not just on its ability to deliver its charitable

objectives, but on...

Member
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c50
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that interesting question. We would be happy to meet the Canal & River Trust—it would be appropriate for the Under-Secretary of State, my hon. Friend the Member for North Cornwall (Dan Rogerson), to do so, as he is taking the Bill through the House—but...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c51
House
House of Commons

On that point, will my right hon. Friend clarify something for me? What is a new source of water?

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
571 c51
House
House of Commons