Skip to main content

1-20 of 76 results for member:"Baroness Byford"

Subject X
Planning permission

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Planning permission (76)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I will just say a few words. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, for his comments. The Joint Committee went into quite a bit of discussion about the fact that this should be a UK project, not a London and the south-east project. I am grateful to...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2019
Reference
799 cc587-8
House
House of Lords

I appreciate the noble Lord’s comments. It would be a great mistake to say that people from elsewhere who have the skills and opportunities to come here are not able to use them. Is the noble Lord really saying that people who live in London and the Greater London area...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2019
Reference
799 c588
House
House of Lords

That is indeed where the work will be done, but it does not have to be done solely by people living in London and the south-east. I suspect there will be quite a few people coming from abroad to work on this project as well. If that is so, I...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2019
Reference
799 c588
House
House of Lords

I have to take the noble Lord to task on engagement in schools north of the south—if you see what I mean. Not enough of us take part in the Lord Speaker’s outreach programme, but many do, and I assure the noble Lord that the majority of schools I go...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2019
Reference
799 c611
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to follow the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, because I have added my name to his second amendment. In the Joint Committee, we had long discussions about the whole question of access, particularly, as the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, has said, about access within the building once...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2019
Reference
799 cc621-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my name is added to Amendment 12. In the Joint Committee, we said that it was easier to see what restoration was about, but the renewal part exercised quite a bit of our time. In other words: what sort of Parliament did we want and what sort of...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2019
Reference
799 c632
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to issue planning authorities with guidance on whether applications for permission to construct light industrial buildings or workshops should be considered in the light of the possibility of a later application for change of use to residential purposes.

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 2017
Reference
HL3483
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what guidance they have issued to planning authorities concerning the inclusion in permissions for housing schemes of a clause or clauses regarding the priority to be given to the construction of affordable dwellings.

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 November 2017
Reference
HL3186
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment has my name attached to it. My noble friend has gone into the detail of it, so I will not repeat that. The noble Lord, Lord Greaves, knows that we had quite a long discussion on this issue in considering the Deregulation Act. While he said...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2016
Reference
769 cc2493-4
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have any plans to introduce a right of appeal against planning permission granted for an application that contains, or is based on, out-of-date, incorrect or incomplete information.[HL4415]

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 2014
Reference
HL4415; 751 c86WA
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Byford

40A: After Clause 12, insert the following new Clause—

“Registration of town or village green: reduction of period under section 15(3)(c)

(1) Section 15 of the Commons Act 2006 (registration of greens) is amended as follows.

(2) In subsection (3), in paragraph (c), for the words from “the period” to the...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2013
Reference
744 c173
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend on the Front Bench. Clearly I am disappointed that the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, did not feel able to support the amendment, but I am very grateful for the Minister’s support.

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2013
Reference
744 c178
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Byford

40D: Clause 14, page 17, line 21, leave out “of two years”

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2013
Reference
744 c186
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment 40D standing in my name. I apologise for my voice, which is going. Amendment 40A introduces

a new clause which amends the Commons Act 2006, reducing the time period from two years to one in cases where the application relates to land...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2013
Reference
744 cc173-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that the slight difficulty arose because the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, got up to speak before I had a chance to get in. I apologise for not speaking before he wound up on his amendment. I come with no practical hands-on experience in local government but...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
728 c1413-4
House
House of Lords

No, you need to move the amendment.

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
728 c1412
House
House of Lords

Perhaps my noble friend would clarify the position. I would like to see a presumption that the meetings will be open, but obviously under certain circumstances access will be restricted. As things stand, it is a case of either/or; there is no presumption that open meetings will be the norm...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
728 c1432
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if I fail to welcome back the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, he might take it in the wrong manner. I welcome his return to the Bill. He has put a lot of work into it, and we welcome him back. I shall make one comment and ask one...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2009
Reference
711 c428
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not repeat what my noble friend has so clearly said, but the issue has been raised with me on several occasions. One such provision in particular, if it were so moved, would affect a wildlife sanctuary, which is clearly undesirable. I hope that the Minister will...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c26
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before my noble friend does that, perhaps I can ask the Minister a question. He explained quite rightly that this matter will go out to consultation. However, if for any reason that consultation comes down against the person regarding his land or a business operating on it, no...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c28-9
House
House of Lords