Skip to main content

1-20 of 509 results for subject:Storage

Subject X
Nuclear power stations

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Nuclear power stations (509)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

As I say in the Member’s explanatory statement, this debate is to raise issues that many people have raised with me about the purpose of Clause 230, which covers licensing nuclear sites that are on or under the territorial sea of the UK.

The noble Baroness, Lady McIntosh of Pickering, in...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2023
Reference
826 cc401-2GC
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether (a) she or (b) the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority will make a decision, following consultation, on whether more nuclear waste from former Magnox Stations will be stored in situ for the indefinite future.

Asked by
David Drew (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 September 2019
Reference
284863
House
House of Commons

In November 2013, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority’s radioactive waste management directorate (RWMD) informed my Department of a modelling error in their assessments of the on-site cooling time required for spent fuel from new nuclear reactors before it could be placed in an off-site geological disposal facility (GDF).

RWMD subsequently corrected the...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Department
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written statements
Date
31 March 2014
Reference
578 cc63-5WS
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what assessment he has made of the carbon impact of new nuclear power plants as a result of (a) obtaining uranium, (b) processing uranium and (c) storing radioactive waste.

Asked by
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 February 2014
Reference
188922; 576 c493W
House
House of Commons

Amendment to clause 38 debated and withdrawn. Clauses 38 to 42 agreed to. Government amendment to clause 43 agreed to, with the clause agreed to as amended. Clauses 44 to 63 agreed to. Schedules 4 to 8 agreed to. Clauses 64 to 72 agreed to. Government amendment to clause 73...

Lead member
Lord Barker of Battle; John Hayes
Answering member
Tom Greatrex; Baroness Berger
Department
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Energy Bill Committee
Date
31 January 2013
House
House of Commons

Lords debate on motion to take note of the report of the Science and Technology Committee on Radioactive Waste Management: a further update (HL 95 2009-10). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Broers
Answering member
Lord Marland
Department
Science and Technology Committee (HL); Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
10 February 2011
Reference
725 c425-38
House
House of Lords

I am happy to follow the noble Lord, Lord Broers, who was a most effective chairman in the short period that we had to look at this issue. The fact that this was one of a continuum of investigations into this difficult area does not necessarily mean that progress has...

Member
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2011
Reference
725 c428-31
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I genuinely welcome this report by the noble Lord, Lord Broers. I had not realised that this was the fifth in the series—I had counted up to three. I highly recommend that he keeps on the same track and that we have more, especially because of the timescale...

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2011
Reference
725 c431-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Science and Technology Sub-Committee for its short report on the performance of CoRWM in the implementation of the managing radioactive waste safely programme. I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Broers, on the excellent way in which he introduced the report. It has been a very...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2011
Reference
725 c432-5
House
House of Lords

Moved By That this House takes note of the Report of the Science and Technology Committee on Radioactive Waste Management: a further update (2nd Report, Session 2009–10, HL Paper 95).

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2011
Reference
725 c425
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before discussing the Science and Technology Select Committee’s report, Radioactive Waste Management: a further update, I wish to compliment the coalition and the previous Government on their firm support for nuclear power as a major component in the UK’s energy strategy. At last, we seem to be moving...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2011
Reference
725 c425-8
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord O’Neill of Clackmannan, for pulling me up on that point. He is right that a centre of excellence exists. There is no question about what he has just said. The most important point is that we continue to have Cumbria as a...

Member
Lord Marland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2011
Reference
725 c437-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that encouraging response. I am particularly pleased that he has been to Sellafield and seen some of the problems, which has spurred him to action. I am encouraged that he has sought additional funds and that the Government are putting their mind to...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2011
Reference
725 c438
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to noble Lords who have spoken, particularly to the noble Lord, Lord Broers, who instigated this valuable debate, and to the committee for its work and recommendations. We have covered a number of key areas, and I hope I cover some of the questions...

Member
Lord Marland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2011
Reference
725 c435-7
House
House of Lords

The Minister made reference earlier to the ambition of creating a centre of excellence in the north-west and Sellafield. Does he agree that such a centre of excellence at present exists in so far as we have the National Nuclear Laboratory, which is engaged in fantastic work and will greatly...

Member
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2011
Reference
725 c437
House
House of Lords

Draft Nuclear Decommissioning and Waste Handling (Designated Technical Matters) Order 2010. Considered by Delegated Legislation Committee. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Charles Hendry
Answering member
Huw Irranca-Davies
Department
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Date
22 November 2010
Reference
1st DLC
House
House of Commons

Energy security. Second opposition day debate (part 2). Motion negatived on division (355 to 182). Amendment agreed on division (285 to 173).

Lead member
Greg Clark
Answering member
Ed Miliband
Department
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Opposition days
Date
13 January 2010
Reference
503 c754-808
House
House of Commons

I declare an interest as an adviser to the South Hook LNG terminal, which has featured in this debate today. It is a hugely significant development, and it comes as no surprise that it was opened by Her Majesty the Queen and his excellency the Emir of Qatar earlier this...

Member
Richard Ottaway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2010
Reference
503 c789-91
House
House of Commons

The world is facing a resource crisis. The global population is expected to increase to 9 billion by 2050. Not only is the world increasing in population; it is becoming richer. As nations such as India and China enjoy economic growth, their citizens want and can afford to consume like...

Member
Mark Hendrick (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2010
Reference
503 c791
House
House of Commons

Several speakers have talked about the oil and gas industry in the North sea, but I would caution Members about writing it off. The Energy and Climate Change Committee report shows that this industry still has a future, not only because there is a large amount of oil and gas...

Member
Mike Weir (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2010
Reference
503 c792-4
House
House of Commons