Skip to main content

1-20 of 29 results for member:"Lord Broers"

Subject X
Nuclear power

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Nuclear power (29)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Howell, and the noble Viscount, Lord Hanworth, on their excellent speeches.

It is now accepted that the relentless increase of CO2 in the atmosphere is a serious problem that needs urgently to be stopped because the greenhouse heating effect that it causes results...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2021
Reference
816 cc2077-2080
House
House of Lords
Asked by
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 April 2021
Reference
811 c1632
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the Government on the most realistic energy plan we have seen in recent years. It realises that in the generation of electricity it is essential to sustain nuclear power or CCUS to address the problem that renewables are intermittent. The many applications of batteries are included...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2020
Reference
808 c1703
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome this debate and the Absolute Zero report by UK FIRES. It is essential that academic experts with experience in energy issues, both technical and social, work closely

with politicians in getting us through the crisis. In the same way, I welcome Greenhouse Gas Removal by the...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2020
Reference
801 cc1952-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am speaking in this debate because I wish to emphasise the importance of nuclear power in our national infrastructure strategy. If we are to meet our net zero greenhouse gas emission target by 2050, without the lights going out when the wind does not blow and the...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2019
Reference
800 cc208-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as a foreign member of the Chinese Academy of Engineering. I am somewhat encouraged by what the Minister said because, in the situation we find ourselves in now, where storage of carbon dioxide is not going well—we have made scarcely any progress—and it is now obvious that batteries are far too expensive to back up wind on a national scale, we are left with nuclear, so it is extremely important that we proceed as quickly as possible. I have to admit that when I talk to Chinese engineers they feel that if we replicate an EPR we can do it at 30% less money than the initial venture, which means that if we combine that with the cost of wind properly backed up, which is about £60 per megawatt hour, we can do the same with nuclear. So should we not get on with all speed, but maximising our own contribution by including the small modular reactor?

Asked by
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
10 December 2018
Reference
794 c1206
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as one whose name was on Amendment 3, it gives me pleasure to support the replacement of that amendment with Commons Amendment 3A. The Commons amendment supports the basic proposals that we put forward in the Lords amendment but is more detailed and will better ensure that, if...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 June 2018
Reference
791 cc1317-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I very much appreciate what the Minister said with respect to the progress the Government are making to seek these agreements—it is essential that we get agreements with our major partners. I do not feel that the amendment, as it is, will put us in great danger by...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2018
Reference
790 c205
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will make some brief remarks in answer to the noble Viscount, Lord Trenchard. The research we are talking about here is not necessarily just in fusion—it includes fusion, but that is a great big project—but in areas that are ancillary to a certain extent but terribly important....

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2018
Reference
790 cc217-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Broers

3: After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Agreements required before withdrawal

(1) In the event that any of the agreements listed in subsection (3) are not in place on 1 March 2019, a Minister of the Crown must, as part of the negotiations regarding the United Kingdom’s withdrawal...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2018
Reference
790 c191
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 3 seeks to ensure that the necessary agreements to secure the safeguards for our nuclear power are in place before

1 March 2019. It does not require us to withdraw but to suspend the UK’s withdrawal from the European Atomic Energy Community treaty until the agreements are...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2018
Reference
790 cc191-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I compliment the noble Lord, Lord Hutton, on making clear from the industry’s point of view the importance of this continuity.

I will make a simple and perhaps naive and impractical point in a couple of minutes. I support Amendment 1 and the other amendments because, as I said...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2018
Reference
789 cc292-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would like to catch the Minister before she sits down, if that is possible. The noble Lord, Lord Fox, and I have mentioned research and development. Resources to sustain that

research and development come through Euratom. Have the Government said anything about how these resources are going...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2018
Reference
789 c344
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I realised when I saw my position in the batting order here that most of what I was going to say would have already been said, although I am somewhat astounded by what is coming out just now—what the noble Lords, Lord Whitty, Lord O’Neill and Lord Carlile,...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2018
Reference
788 cc2043-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Earl, Lord Selborne, both on his excellent opening speech, which so well reflected the findings of the Select Committee, and on his characteristically expert chairing of this inquiry, as mentioned by the noble Lord, Lord Oxburgh.

I shall restrict myself to one request this evening...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2017
Reference
785 cc594-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister realise that this is a very competitive industrial situation? We cannot go on procrastinating. In engineering matters, there is never 100% certainty. We must step forward and take a risk on this, to my mind.

Asked by
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
782 c1213
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
782 c1213
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this was a rigorous inquiry, chaired with consummate skill by the noble Earl, Lord Selborne, and supported with detailed expertise by Professor Jim Watson and highly professional co-ordination by the committee staff, led by Chris Clarke. I join others in congratulating them all and declare my interest as...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2015
Reference
765 cc1576-9
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lawson, for that intervention. It is dangerous to be overly optimistic, and people have accused some of the people working on the new types of reactors of overoptimism, but the promise of fusion, as the noble Lord, Lord Hennessy, said earlier in this debate,...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2015
Reference
765 c1577
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are already at a point in this debate when much that must be said has been said. As the noble Lord, Lord Crickhowell, pointed out, the energy world has changed a great deal since the report was published, but I still believe that it is crucial to...

Member
Lord Broers (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 June 2012
Reference
737 cc218-220GC
House
House of Lords