1-20 of 31 results for tabledby:"Lord Moynihan"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.256 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- tabledby:"Lord Moynihan"
- We searched for
- tablingMember_ses:302546
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask Her Majesty's Government, following the ending of the statute on limitations this year for testing samples collected at the London Olympic Games in 2012, (1) how many anti-doping violations were found from retested samples collected in London; (2) what percentage of the urine samples collected at the London...
To ask Her Majesty's Government, following the ending of the statute on limitations this year for testing samples collected at the London Olympic Games in 2012, (1) how many anti-doping violations were found from retested samples collected in London; (2) what percentage of the urine samples collected at the London...
The government does not hold the data to answer this question. The samples collected during the London Olympic Games in 2012 were done so under the jurisdiction of the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) and the International Olympic Committee (IOC), rather than UK Anti-Doping (the UK’s national anti-doping organisation). As LOCOG no longer exists, it is therefore the IOC that has the ability to reanalyse the samples collected at the Games. UK Anti-Doping has welcomed the reanalysis of samples from previous Olympic and Paralympic Games.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have contributed to the independent review currently being undertaken by UK Athletics over the handling of the Alberto Salazar scandal; and what assessment they have made of the methods associated with the Nike Oregon Project which were employed by UK Athletics' performance staff,...
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have contributed to the independent review currently being undertaken by UK Athletics over the handling of the Alberto Salazar scandal; and what assessment they have made of the methods associated with the Nike Oregon Project which were employed by UK Athletics' performance staff,...
UK Sport supported UK Athletics in commissioning an independent review into its decision-making in respect of its relationship with Mr Salazar and the Nike Oregon Project. Both UK Sport and DCMS will await the outcomes of that review before drawing any further conclusions.
It is absolutely right that all athletes should be able to compete on a level playing field.
Clean sport is a shared responsibility; one in which sport and government should work together.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether UKÂ Athletics has, at any time, sought advice from either UK Sport or UK Anti-Doping about the ban imposed on Alberto Salazar by the United States Anti-Doping Agency leading to the closure of the Nike Oregon Project; and if so, whether either of those bodies...
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether UKÂ Athletics has, at any time, sought advice from either UK Sport or UK Anti-Doping about the ban imposed on Alberto Salazar by the United States Anti-Doping Agency leading to the closure of the Nike Oregon Project; and if so, whether either of those bodies...
Subsequent to USADA’s ban of Alberto Salazar being issued, UK Sport’s discussions with UK Athletics on this issue have focused on ensuring there is an effective independent review as to whether UK Athletics took the appropriate decisions in respect of its relationship with Mr Salazar and the Nike Oregon Project.
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) has offered support to the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) during its investigations. However, UKAD has not received any request for information from UK Athletics in relation to Mr Salazar’s ban.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether Russia has met all the criteria for re-compliance and re-entry into international sports competition as outlined in the McClaren Reports, The Independent Person Report, published on 18 July 2016, and The Independent Person 2nd Report, published on 9 December 2016, including...
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether Russia has met all the criteria for re-compliance and re-entry into international sports competition as outlined in the McClaren Reports, The Independent Person Report, published on 18 July 2016, and The Independent Person 2nd Report, published on 9 December 2016, including...
At its meeting on 20 September 2018, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) Executive Committee made a decision to reinstate RUSADA (Russia's Anti-Doping Agency), following a recommendation made by WADA's independent Compliance Review Committee (CRC).
WADA's decision to reinstate RUSADA is subject to two strict post-reinstatement conditions:
- RUSADA and the Russian Ministry of Sport must procure that the authentic Information Management System (LIMS) data and underlying analytical data of the former Moscow Laboratory set out in the WADA President's letter of 22 June 2018 are received by WADA (via access to the data by an independent expert agreeable to both WADA and the Russian authorities) by no later than 31 December 2018.
- RUSADA and the Russian Ministry of Sport must procure that any re-analysis of samples required by WADA following review of such data is completed by no later than 30 June 2019.
Athletes and fans having faith in clean sport is vitally important, and the UK Government remains fully committed to combating doping in sport and protecting the integrity of sport.
Should there be any failure to do so, we expect WADA to swiftly determine non-compliance under the relevant sanctioning provisions as set out under the International Standard for Code Compliance by Signatories (ISCCS).
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they support the decision made by the World Anti-Doping Agency Executive Committee in September to reinstate the Russian Anti-Doping Agency.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they support the decision made by the World Anti-Doping Agency Executive Committee in September to reinstate the Russian Anti-Doping Agency.
At its meeting on 20 September 2018, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) Executive Committee made a decision to reinstate RUSADA (Russia's Anti-Doping Agency), following a recommendation made by WADA's independent Compliance Review Committee (CRC).
WADA's decision to reinstate RUSADA is subject to two strict post-reinstatement conditions:
- RUSADA and the Russian Ministry of Sport must procure that the authentic Information Management System (LIMS) data and underlying analytical data of the former Moscow Laboratory set out in the WADA President's letter of 22 June 2018 are received by WADA (via access to the data by an independent expert agreeable to both WADA and the Russian authorities) by no later than 31 December 2018.
- RUSADA and the Russian Ministry of Sport must procure that any re-analysis of samples required by WADA following review of such data is completed by no later than 30 June 2019.
Athletes and fans having faith in clean sport is vitally important, and the UK Government remains fully committed to combating doping in sport and protecting the integrity of sport.
Should there be any failure to do so, we expect WADA to swiftly determine non-compliance under the relevant sanctioning provisions as set out under the International Standard for Code Compliance by Signatories (ISCCS).
To ask Her Majesty's Government what sanctions are in place for pre-meditated doping in professional sport; whether those sanctions are comparable to sanctions in place for fraud offences; and what assessment they have made of the sufficiency of such sanctions when used.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what sanctions are in place for pre-meditated doping in professional sport; whether those sanctions are comparable to sanctions in place for fraud offences; and what assessment they have made of the sufficiency of such sanctions when used.
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD), an Arm's Length Body of the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) implements the UK’s Anti-Doping Policy, which in the most serious cases, and for repeat offences, can impose life-bans for Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRV). There remains the opportunity, if evidence indicates, to work in partnership with law enforcement to investigate a case where a criminal offence may have been committed, and thus criminal sanctions may apply.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what representations they have made to the World Anti-Doping Agency on the length of bans imposed on athletes who test positive for performance-enhancing stimulants with regard to their congruence with the new sanctions recently endorsed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, the International Association...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what representations they have made to the World Anti-Doping Agency on the length of bans imposed on athletes who test positive for performance-enhancing stimulants with regard to their congruence with the new sanctions recently endorsed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, the International Association...
The Government did not make any representations to the World Anti-Doping Agency on the length of bans imposed on athletes who test positive for performance-enhancing stimulants, but endorsed and supported those made by UK Anti-Doping, the UK’s National Anti-Doping Organisation, throughout the consultation process. The Government remains committed to playing a full and active part in the global fight against doping in sport and welcomes the new World Anti-Doping Code, coming into force on 1 January 2015, being tougher on those who cheat. The new Code implements a stringent sanctioning regime in respect of intentional doping, which will now result in a four year ban from all sport.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they intend to increase their contribution to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) target over the years 2014 to 2017; and whether it is their intention to contribute to the additional supplementary $10 million call for funds by WADA to enable new research into anti-doping...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they intend to increase their contribution to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) target over the years 2014 to 2017; and whether it is their intention to contribute to the additional supplementary $10 million call for funds by WADA to enable new research into anti-doping...
The UK’s annual contribution to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) budget is paid by UK Anti-Doping and we expect the UK to continue to fully support WADA through our agreed contribution. The UK does not intend to contribute to the additional supplementary $10m call for funds.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will publish a response to the 2011 Global Commission on Drug Policy; and what is their assessment of the authors' view that the global war on drugs has failed.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will publish a response to the 2011 Global Commission on Drug Policy; and what is their assessment of the authors' view that the global war on drugs has failed.
Whether being a signatory to the World Anti-Doping Agency code requires funding to be withdrawn from domestic sports in the United Kingdom where the relevant international sports federations do not comply with the code.
Whether being a signatory to the World Anti-Doping Agency code requires funding to be withdrawn from domestic sports in the United Kingdom where the relevant international sports federations do not comply with the code.
Whether the Youth Sport Trust has received any funding to help implement UK Sport's Start Clean programme. [HL 420].
Whether the Youth Sport Trust has received any funding to help implement UK Sport's Start Clean programme. [HL 420].
Whether they will meet any third party claims for compensation arising out of a faulty drug test carried out by UK Sport; or whether the national governing body will remain responsible. [HL 4647].
Whether they will meet any third party claims for compensation arising out of a faulty drug test carried out by UK Sport; or whether the national governing body will remain responsible. [HL 4647].
How many tests for erythropoietin (EPO) were carried out by the UK Sport's Drug Free Directorate in each of the last three years; and how many are planned for each of the next three years. [HL 4646].
How many tests for erythropoietin (EPO) were carried out by the UK Sport's Drug Free Directorate in each of the last three years; and how many are planned for each of the next three years. [HL 4646].
Further to the Written Answer by the Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 22 July 2004, 664 c82WA, whether the United Kingdom is now fully compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code; if not, in what areas it is not compliant; and what changes have been made to comply with the code....
Further to the Written Answer by the Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 22 July 2004, 664 c82WA, whether the United Kingdom is now fully compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code; if not, in what areas it is not compliant; and what changes have been made to comply with the code....
What expertise in anti-doping work is available within the Youth Sports Trust. [HL 4544].
What expertise in anti-doping work is available within the Youth Sports Trust. [HL 4544].
What funding UK Sport is allocating to the 'Start Clean' campaign launched on 12 July; and which partner organisations are involved in the production and delivery of the campaign. [HL 3914]. - Inc figures.
What funding UK Sport is allocating to the 'Start Clean' campaign launched on 12 July; and which partner organisations are involved in the production and delivery of the campaign. [HL 3914]. - Inc figures.
What conclusions were reached on the future of the United Kingom's Anti-doping Agency at the meeting of the Sports Cabinet on Tuesday 20 April. [HL 2558].
What conclusions were reached on the future of the United Kingom's Anti-doping Agency at the meeting of the Sports Cabinet on Tuesday 20 April. [HL 2558].
Which programmes funded by the Home Office and its sponsored bodies can be accessed by sports organisations to promote (a) social inclusion; (b) crime reduction; (c) drug reduction; (d) social cohesion; and (e) anti-racism. [HL 1944]. - Inc figures.
Which programmes funded by the Home Office and its sponsored bodies can be accessed by sports organisations to promote (a) social inclusion; (b) crime reduction; (c) drug reduction; (d) social cohesion; and (e) anti-racism. [HL 1944]. - Inc figures.
How many people were (a) cautioned; (b) arrested; (c) charged; and (d) found guilty of possession of anabolic steroids in the United Kingdom for each year since 1997. [HL 1947]. - Inc table.
How many people were (a) cautioned; (b) arrested; (c) charged; and (d) found guilty of possession of anabolic steroids in the United Kingdom for each year since 1997. [HL 1947]. - Inc table.
What is their estimate of the number of people in the United Kingdom who are abusing anabolic steroids; and what steps they are taking to reduce the abuse of anabolic steroids. [HL 1946] [HL 1949].
What is their estimate of the number of people in the United Kingdom who are abusing anabolic steroids; and what steps they are taking to reduce the abuse of anabolic steroids. [HL 1946] [HL 1949].