Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,625 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Subject X
Liability

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Liability (1,625)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Committee stage first day. Clause 1 debated with amendments, clauses and new clauses. Clause 1 amendment 21 withdrawn. Clauses 1 and 2 agreed to. Clause 3 amendment 12 negatived on division (81 to 266). Clauses 3 to 51 agreed to. New clause NC2 negatived on division (65 to 257). New...

Lead member
Chris McDonald
Answering member
Harriett Baldwin
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HC); Debates on bills
Notes
Division No. 13 on the Question relating to New Clause NC2 corrected Tuesday 9 June, 787 cc189-231: Noes should read 251, instead of 257.
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 cc72-118
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 21, page 1, line 6, leave out “of or including” and insert “predominantly of”.

This amendment would narrow the definition of a steel undertaking so that it had to be a business consisting predominantly of the manufacture or processing of steel, or iron for the purposes...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c72
House
House of Commons

If I may, I would also like to speak to the other amendments in my name and those of my hon. Friends, and, before I do that, approach the Bill with the serious concern it deserves. Today’s amendments reflect some of the points the Opposition made on Second Reading: that...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c75
House
House of Commons

To correct the record, I have been calling for British Steel to be nationalised for seven years. I urged the previous Conservative Government not to sell British Steel to the Chinese, and if they had followed my excellent advice, we would not be in the pickle we are now in.

Member
Richard Tice (Reform UK)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c75
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has got his point on the record.

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c75
House
House of Commons

It is interesting that the hon. Member for Boston and Skegness (Richard Tice) once again outflanks Labour on socialism, but there we are. As a fellow west midlands MP, I am sure my right hon. Friend will be as concerned about the Bill as I am. My constituent, Mr Peter...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 cc75-6
House
House of Commons

As a west midlands MP, I absolutely recognise that. In fact, I was with a constituent in Worcester on Friday, Mr Michael Outwin of Industrial & Tractor Ltd, who is going to have to pay a 50% tariff. I tried to table some amendments on the tariff regime, but unfortunately,...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 cc76-7
House
House of Commons

I thank the shadow Minister, the hon. Member for West Worcestershire (Dame Harriett Baldwin), for her incredibly generous remarks at the start of the debate. I think we all try our best here with whatever expertise we have; of course, I recognise her expertise in finance, and will aim to...

Member
Chris McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c78
House
House of Commons

Yes, the Minister is right: Greg Clark nationalised it. As far as my constituents who work at Scunthorpe are concerned—and, I am sure, those of my hon. Friend the Member for Brigg and Immingham (Martin Vickers)—all we want is a viable Scunthorpe. We do not take an ideological line on...

Member
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c78
House
House of Commons

Perhaps I can even give a slightly fuller answer than that. The particular issue with that previous nationalisation by the then Secretary of State was that it was effected merely to create a change of ownership, without actually improving the quality of the business or attracting additional investment into the...

Member
Chris McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 cc78-9
House
House of Commons

I fully support the need to buy British, but does the Minister recognise that JCB, based in my constituency, cannot source the grade and size of steel required for its machines entirely from the UK, and that a significant proportion of its steel comes from the EU? The proposed tariffs...

Member
Jacob Collier (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c79
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend raises a specific point about JCB. I am reasonably familiar with its business, and I think its particular concern may be around the sourcing of plate steel. The steel trade measures—the tariffs and quotas that we announced—are designed to ensure that the UK is not subject to...

Member
Chris McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c79
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c79
House
House of Commons

I was just going to address the point the right hon. Gentleman made about the business in his constituency. I am not familiar with that business, but the general approach we have taken is to ensure that the groupings of steel under the trade measures are subject to the tariffs...

Member
Chris McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 cc79-80
House
House of Commons

For clarity—perhaps I was not clear— a constituent of mine runs the company but the company itself is actually in another constituency, and it employs people throughout the west midlands. Could I write to the Minister about that particular case in order to seek more clarity?

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c80
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Chris McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c80
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for that. I want to make two brief points on tariffs, which the Minister mentioned. First, the Shropshire chamber of commerce has said:

“There is growing concern that tariffs may be applied to certain materials and products that are not currently available from UK manufacturers”.

I would be interested...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c80
House
House of Commons

I am aware of that issue as well, and if the right hon. Gentleman would like to include all those issues in the letter, I will be happy to provide him with a response.

Member
Chris McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c80
House
House of Commons

I have been contacted by Coker Engineering in my constituency, which supplies Rolls-Royce, Leonardo and other defence companies. It can only use steels from certified electric arc mills of certain types and is worried about facing 50% tariffs after 1 July, once tariff-free goods have been used up. Will the...

Member
Gideon Amos (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c80
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member might wish to let the business know that we have committed to a 12-month review of these tariffs, which, as I said, apply to steels that are made or could be made in the UK. I am aware that Speciality Steel UK is currently not operational as...

Member
Chris McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
787 c80
House
House of Commons