Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,066 results for subject:"Origin marking"

Subject X
Labelling

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Labelling (1,066)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Member
Aphra Brandreth (Conservative)
Type
Presentation bills
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
Bill 45 2026-27
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 3 July 2025 to UIN 61881 on Western Sahara: Origin Marking, if she will take steps to ensure that produce originating in Western Sahara is labelled as such by supermarkets.

Asked by
Kim Johnson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
113951
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what plans her Department has to improve transparency in (a) method-of-production welfare labelling and (b) country of origin labelling.

Asked by
Kate Osamor (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 January 2026
Reference
100317
House
House of Commons

Report stage. New clause 1, considered with further new clauses and amendments and withdrawn. New clause 4 negatived on division (171 to 274). Clause 2, amendment 16, negatived on division (100 to 339). Clause 3, amendment 24, negatived on division (164 to 273). Third reading. Agreed to on division (264...

Lead member
Justin Madders
Answering member
Andrew Griffith
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 cc367-422
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Gareth Snell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 c367
House
House of Commons

I wish to speak briefly to new clause 1, which is a probing amendment that seeks to establish a couple of facts. I will start, however, by thanking the Minister for his time yesterday and for engaging with me on the matter. I know that he takes the matter of...

Member
Gareth Snell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 cc376-7
House
House of Commons

In Staffordshire.

Member
Adam Jogee (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 c377
House
House of Commons

Yes, that is in Staffordshire, as my hon. Friend says. There are factories in Newcastle-under-Lyme as well.

We are, however, seeing a proliferation of companies that seek to pass off material not made in the UK. Its firing will have taken place overseas and it will then be imported into the...

Member
Gareth Snell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 cc377-8
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to have put my name to the new clause tabled by my neighbour in Stoke-on-Trent Central. Does he agree, notwithstanding his comments, that much of this is also about pride? It is about pride in our people, pride in the skill of our people and pride in...

Member
Adam Jogee (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 c378
House
House of Commons

As always, my hon. Friend is absolutely right. We in Stoke-on-Trent can talk at length about that pride, but I will not do so today, I promise, although we can talk about our pride that is associated with our industrial heritage.

Rob Flello, who once served in this place and is...

Member
Gareth Snell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 cc378-9
House
House of Commons

I agree and endorse what the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent Central (Gareth Snell) said. He makes logical and coherent points, and the Bill could be used as a vehicle for his suggestion. I therefore support his new clause 1 and new clause 4, which is of a similar ilk.

However, aspects...

Member
Jim Allister (Traditional Unionist Voice)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 cc379-380
House
House of Commons

The hon. and learned Member is making an important point, which is why I will support the Opposition amendments in this vein today. Does he agree that the reports from the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee in the House of Lords are important in bringing to light just how...

Member
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 c380
House
House of Commons

I agree, absolutely. The House of Lords has done some very informative and useful work on the Bill. I only hope that it is not wasted on this Government, but that is my fear.

Member
Jim Allister (Traditional Unionist Voice)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 c380
House
House of Commons

Has the hon. and learned Member had time to look at amendment 13, under which, if there was any backsliding by the Government, the matter would be brought back to this House for determination? I suspect that he, like me, would not accuse Ministers of being capable of abusing Henry...

Member
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 c380
House
House of Commons

I agree, absolutely. No Member of this House should glibly pass over clause 2(7), because it expressly and emphatically sets out that regulations, which can be made without recourse to this House, can provide that

“a product requirement is to be treated as met”

if it meets the relevant EU regulation. That...

Member
Jim Allister (Traditional Unionist Voice)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 cc380-1
House
House of Commons

The Government have said throughout the passage of this legislation that it is not about the European Union, yet as the hon. and learned Member makes clear, it is only the European Union that we can align with through regulations made under it. Does that not fundamentally undermine the Government’s...

Member
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 c381
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. The Government tell us, “When we make trade deals, we may be able to ensure the requisite alignment,” but this Bill provides for alignment only with the EU, which rather lets the cat out of the bag. The Bill is not about facilitating international trade, so that we could,...

Member
Jim Allister (Traditional Unionist Voice)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 c381
House
House of Commons

Once again, it is a great honour to speak about the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill. Today, we are focused on the amendments proposed following the Public Bill Committee, on which, in common with the right hon. Member for Basildon and Billericay (Mr Holden), I was honoured to serve; I...

Member
Adam Thompson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 c382
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member and I served on the Bill Committee together. I think he misses a slightly important point that this is not about international alignment, as is put forward in the amendments tabled by the Opposition, but alignment with the EU, and that is why there is such concern...

Member
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 c382
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Member for his intervention. As I discussed extensively during the Bill Committee, there is a misunderstanding here of exactly what the Bill is doing, so I fundamentally disagree with the point he makes, but I will go into more detail on it in my speech.

One...

Member
Adam Thompson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
768 cc382-3
House
House of Commons