Skip to main content

1-20 of 492 results for subject:Reviews

Subject X
Human rights

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Human rights (492)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of introducing Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence legislation as part of the Responsible Business Conduct Review.

Asked by
Luke Taylor (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
114160
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether the scope of his Department’s review of Responsible Business Conduct will include (a) environmental harms in UK company supply chains in their own right, (b) environmental and human rights harms in the UK and (c) input from impacted communities.

Asked by
Ellie Chowns (Green Party)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 October 2025
Reference
83185
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, when his Department will publish the (a) terms of reference and (b) timeline of the review of responsible business conduct; and whether there will be a public consultation on the review.

Asked by
Ellie Chowns (Green Party)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 October 2025
Reference
83184
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on Human Rights
Date
3 September 2025
Reference
HC 1098 2024-26
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Justice Committee
Date
2 September 2025
House
House of Commons

The Independent Policy Review [conducted by Paul Rimmer] [public redacted version]. Incl. annexes. 16p.

Deposited by
Ministry of Defence
Type
Deposited papers
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
DEP2025-0500
House
House of Commons

Statement on the China Audit.

Lead member
David Lammy
Department
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 cc989-1004
House
House of Commons

With permission, I will make a statement on the China audit.

China’s rise has shaped the geopolitical landscape. Over the past decade, its military expenditure doubled. Its armed forces became the world’s largest. It established dominance over critical mineral supply chains. It pursued relentless innovation in electric vehicles, artificial intelligence and...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 cc989-991
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Foreign Secretary for advance sight of his statement, and I look forward to reading the audit and receiving the detailed briefings that clearly cannot be put in the public domain.

Let us be clear: China thinks that its way is the best and only way, and...

Member
Priti Patel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 cc991-3
House
House of Commons

I know that the right hon. Lady can be pretty brazen, but a lecture from her about China policy should make even her blush. The Conservative party oversaw more than a decade of division, inconsistency and complacency towards China. There was no strategy, there was no plan and there was...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 c993
House
House of Commons

Our relationship with China is most definitely a difficult one. On the one hand, it is our third biggest trading partner, but on the other hand, the national security strategy, on page 35, says that there is an increase in espionage, China is undermining our economic security and interfering in...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 c994
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for the interest that she has taken with the China audit. I did say that I would update the Committee, and I look forward to appearing before it and taking questions on this subject.

In completing the audit, it has been important to...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 c994
House
House of Commons

I thank the Foreign Secretary for advance sight of his statement. For years, UK Governments have failed to take seriously the challenge posed by China. The Conservatives failed to deliver even the semblance of a coherent approach to dealing with Beijing. Today, after months of waiting for this audit, the...

Member
Calum Miller (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 cc994-5
House
House of Commons

As I have said, this was a comprehensive audit of our relations with China, and for reasons that the hon. Gentleman and other hon. Members have raised consistently, there are important sections of that audit that must remain classified. He mentioned the Intelligence and Security Committee; as he would expect,...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 c995
House
House of Commons

As chair of the all-party parliamentary groups on Uyghurs and on Hong Kong, I have lost count of the number of responses I have had from Ministers that have referred to today’s audit. I hope the Foreign Secretary will forgive me if I take today as the start of a...

Member
Blair McDougall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 c995
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his championing on the APPGs, and for pressing these issues. I said in my statement that we will co-operate where we can but challenge where we must. I have consistently raised the situation of the Uyghur Muslims in meetings with counterparts, and...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 c996
House
House of Commons

First of all, before we go to the political knockabout, let me say that I have spoken critically on this issue no matter who was in government; let us settle that before we go on. I want to give the Foreign Secretary a quick audit of exactly what should have...

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 c996
House
House of Commons

Let me express my respect for the right hon. Gentleman’s expertise on the China threat. I acknowledge that he is subject to sanctions; I have consistently raised that point with China, noting that it recently lifted sanctions against Members of the European Parliament. I pressed it recently to do the...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 c996
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement. I am the first to recognise, along with him, the need for pragmatism on this issue. He speaks of our closest allies. In Washington a couple of weeks ago, I heard about the Americans’ real concerns about the super-embassy in London....

Member
Matt Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 c997
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the work that my hon. Friend does in this area, but I must maintain that there has not been that access under any Government, other than for those on the Intelligence and Security Committee, who have access to high-classification documents, and for Privy Counsellors, who have...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2025
Reference
769 c997
House
House of Commons