Skip to main content

1-20 of 807 results for subject:"Company law"

Subject X
Harassment

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Harassment (807)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, for the convenience of noble Lords, it will be helpful to consider the Register of People with Significant Control Regulations 2016 together with the Limited Liability Partnerships (Register of People with Significant Control) Regulations 2016. These regulations set out how the register of people with significant control will...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2016
Reference
769 cc127-130GC
House
House of Lords

Draft Companies (Disclosure of Address) Regulations 2008. Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question. Debated with draft Companies (Trading Disclosures) (Amendment) Regulations 2008.

Lead member
Lord Brett
Answering member
Lord De Mauley
Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
15 January 2009
Reference
706 c1426-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lords for their contributions. Taking them in order, I turn, first, to the question of exemptions. There is no exemption for registered offices, as their purpose, under company law, is to be the company’s point of contact with third parties. The same argument applies...

Member
Lord Brett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2009
Reference
706 c1430
House
House of Lords

That the draft regulations laid before the House on 18 November 2008 be approved. My Lords, we are today debating two sets of draft regulations under the Companies Act 2006: the draft Companies (Disclosure of Address) Regulations and the draft Companies (Trading Disclosures) (Amendment) Regulations. During the parliamentary passage of...

Member
Lord Brett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2009
Reference
706 c1426-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am afraid that these are rather unhappy regulations in that they have come out of a rather bad situation—that is, people effectively being persecuted by certain groups for carrying out legal activities. I think of the Huntingdon Life Sciences Company lobby. Unfortunately, extremists got hold of a...

Member
Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2009
Reference
706 c1429-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing the regulations. I shall deal first with the Companies (Trading Disclosures) (Amendment) Regulations 2008. We all, I think, understand that these regulations introduce two exceptions to the requirement on every company to display its registered name at each of its premises. The...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2009
Reference
706 c1428-9
House
House of Lords
Type
Public acts
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
CHAP 46 2006

New clause 1, which I tabled, has been signed by 51 other hon. Members. That significant body of opinion indicates the strength of feeling about the subjects with which the measure deals. One of the historical roles of the House has always been to attempt to protect the general social...

Member
Jon Trickett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c882-4
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Jon Trickett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c882
House
House of Commons

Much of what the hon. Lady says is welcome, but has she spotted that the business review that she supports would not cover, to take a significant climate change issue, Thames Water, a company that her constituents will have a great interest in?

Member
Jim Cousins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c889
House
House of Commons

There was I thinking that we had seen the end of Punch and Judy politics for the sake of it. We are an Opposition that have for some time now said that, when we are happy with legislation, we will not oppose it just for the sake of it. We...

Member
Justine Greening (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c888-9
House
House of Commons

That is a debate for later—in the bar, probably. I simply say that it is clear that if the corporate sector fails to move with the times, if private power insists on remaining secretive and lacking in transparency, when danger occurs, individual companies, and perhaps even the entire system, will...

Member
Jon Trickett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c888
House
House of Commons

Why not?

Member
Colin Burgon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c888
House
House of Commons

It is a great pleasure to be at the Dispatch Box for the first time, although, I have to accept, after today, possibly the last. I am pleased to speak for the Opposition on this part of the Bill, although it is not exactly as I had expected. My understanding...

Member
Justine Greening (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c888
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. Asda is part of the Wal-Mart group which, it is alleged, employs teams based at its headquarters in the United States to break trade unions. Such activities cannot be justified. We have seen little of that in the United Kingdom, but it is part of...

Member
Jon Trickett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c885-6
House
House of Commons

In the course of his compelling speech, my hon. Friend has mentioned Tesco, which is a quoted company and would therefore be covered by the business review requirement, as would Sainsbury. Asda, however, as a subsidiary of Wal-Mart, is not quoted on the stock exchange and is not covered by...

Member
Jim Cousins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c884-5
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for raising that important point. The dominant market position that certain companies secure in their own sector could be used to the disadvantage of those further down the supply chain, often smaller companies living hand to mouth. Anyone who, like me, seems unable to sleep...

Member
Jon Trickett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c886-8
House
House of Commons

I strongly support any effort to ensure that supplier relationships are incorporated in the Bill. Can the hon. Gentleman expand on the challenges that that presents? Suppliers are complaining, anonymously of course, that there are overriders, lack of written contracts, many short-term changes and return of goods on rather questionable...

Member
Andrew George (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c886
House
House of Commons

Yes, procedural. How I did it and when I did it are procedural issues, but I want to hear the hon. Lady’s comments on the substance of the amendments. Does she agree with the right hon. Member for Witney (Mr. Cameron) that she should stand up for not only the...

Member
Baroness Hodge of Barking (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c892
House
House of Commons

Procedural?

Member
Justine Greening (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
450 c892
House
House of Commons