Skip to main content

1-20 of 137 results for subject:Deer

Subject X
Environment

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Environment (137)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Coffey
Answering member
David Drew
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fifth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
29 January 2019
House
House of Commons

Where the criteria that the Minister described for plants has been put into effect in the United Kingdom, how does that work within the single European market? Do the same rules apply across the whole of Europe or do they apply simply to the UK? If so, how has the...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c60-1
House
House of Lords

Before speaking to Amendment No. 285A, which is in this group, I should like to say to the Minister that I have withdrawn Amendments Nos. 281, 286, 287 and 289. I did so because we were satisfied and grateful for Amendment No. 283, which the Minister has introduced. I should like to add that I entirely endorse what my noble friend has...

Member
Earl Peel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c19-20
House
House of Lords

I agree with almost everything that every noble Lord has said in this short debate. I think we are into a question of semantics, in the context of focusing attention on a particular area, and whether we have the right wording to achieve the end.

Member
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c17
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 294:"Page 57, line 30, at end insert—" ““(   )   When exercising powers in relation to any Group 1 or Group 2 offence, an inspector must have regard to any relevant code of practice issued by the Secretary of State.”” The noble Earl said: We now move into the realm of the wildlife inspectors. My...

Member
Earl Peel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c61
House
House of Lords

Clause 50 provides a power for the Secretary of State to issue codes of practice relating to non-native species or to approve such codes issued by others. Amendment No. 293D seeks to remove one of the categories for which such codes may be issued. Amendment No. 293C adds an alternative. The new category...

Member
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c59-60
House
House of Lords

The fact that many people try to control grey squirrels illustrates the scale of the problem. My noble friend Lord Rotherwick said that on his estates, many thousands of grey squirrels are killed every year but the fact is that, as with the rabbit, there are so many grey squirrels around...

Member
Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c55-6
House
House of Lords

We do not have leave to appeal as we speak, so there is no guarantee that there will be an appeal in this case. We thought that with this Bill going through Parliament, it was important that the law should be clarified. That is why I genuinely welcome the debate that...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c87-8
House
House of Lords

May I make some objection to the continual intervention on this point of the noble Lord, Lord Carter? If the Government are going to come back later, on Report, with amendments that we will not have the chance to discuss in Committee, it is perfectly reasonable to have as full a debate...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c82
House
House of Lords

The Companion clearly states that the debate should be relevant to the Question before the House. The noble Baroness has just referred again to an amendment which has not been moved. The Question before the House is Amendment No.306A, her amendment, and that is the amendment that she should speak...

Member
Lord Carter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c82
House
House of Lords

Clause 55 provides a general power for Natural England or the Countryside Council for Wales to put up signs or notices relating to the site on land within the SSSI. They will be able to maintain the signs and remove them and it will be an offence for any other person to...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c77-8
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord, but I shall expand my remarks just a little because this point is worthy of discussion. For example, I think I am right in saying that there is nothing to ensure that these wildlife inspectors will be subjected to the same level of training as, say, trading...

Member
Earl Peel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c61-3
House
House of Lords

If the mistake is mine, I can only apologise to the Committee, because I certainly did not want to go down an alley. I thought there was a definite link between the two. What I would like to do is reflect on what the Minister has said and perhaps we can have a discussion...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c70
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness for giving way. I am advised that the Destructive Imported Animals Act 1932 does not have anything to do with the bushmeat offences, which, as the noble Baroness rightly says, have annoyed and upset people over the years.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c70
House
House of Lords

I have listened with care to what the Minister had to say. I do not mean this disrespectfully, but while we are delighted that the noble Lord is still within the brief, he is still fairly new to it. We have had discussions over many years about the need to control the illegal...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c70
House
House of Lords

The amendment seeks to remove the upper time limit for bringing summary proceedings for offences against the Destructive Imported Animals Act 1932. The Bill already extends the present requirement to bring summary proceedings for offences under the 1932 Act within six months of the commission of the offence. Under the Bill, summary proceedings...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c69-70
House
House of Lords

I do not know the answer to the noble Baroness’s question with regard to a list of SSSIs. I am advised that there is such a list. I do not know how long it is but I presume that it is fairly long. We shall put a copy of it in the Library at...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c72-3
House
House of Lords

Government Amendments Nos. 300 and 301 seem to be practical amendments but I have one question in relation to SSSIs. Is there now any database which the public can access to see all the SSSIs in their area? Defra has developed a very sophisticated geographical information system. Can one now log on to that and...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c72
House
House of Lords

I hope that the Minister can clarify a point on Amendment No. 301. As I understand it, the amendment applies only to notifications made by English Nature or the Countryside Council for Wales from the point of commencement onwards. A great number of SSSIs have already been notified in England and Wales. Indeed,...

Member
Lord Carter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c72
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 300:"After Clause 54, insert the following new clause—" ““DENOTIFICATION    In section 28D of the 1981 Act (denotification), in subsection (1), for ““no longer”” substitute ““not””.”” The noble Lord said: By virtue of the improvements brought about to the SSSI legislation by the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000, Parliament enabled the conservation bodies to...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c70-2
House
House of Lords