Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,297 results for subject:Defence

Subject X
Energy

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Energy (1,297)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, if he will publish the full list of energy projects whose funding has been delayed, reduced or cancelled to meet the capital reductions required to finance the Defence Investment Plan, together with the value of the reduction in...

Asked by
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2026
Reference
15280
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business and Trade Committee
Date
7 July 2026
Reference
HC 120 2026-27
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has conducted an assessment of the potential economic impact from (i) cancellation, (ii) delay, (iii) descoping, (iv) or reprofiling of energy and transport projects to fund increases in defence spending.

Asked by
Ayoub Khan (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
14743
House
House of Commons

If everything is fine, why do we have a new Defence Secretary? [Interruption.] He was not here last week, was he? Let us face it: this is a Government on life support. What is their grand plan now? Let me get this straight: they want to make the job-destroying Energy Secretary Chancellor; they want to bring back the former Transport Secretary, who resigned for nicking phones; and they want to replace the Deputy Prime Minister with the former Deputy Prime Minister, who resigned for dodging taxes. Those are all pointless distractions. Here is a better idea: why do they not cut welfare, fund defence, make energy cheap and back the North sea?

Asked by
Claire Coutinho (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 June 2026
Reference
787 c822
House
House of Commons

It is very thin gruel. I am here, like the right hon. Lady, because I am standing in for the leader of my party. I am proud to serve the Prime Minister and proud of what the Labour Government are delivering: more rights for working people—the biggest upgrade to workers’ rights in a generation—the biggest boost to defence spending since the cold war, and lifting more children out of poverty in a single term than any British Government in history. [Interruption.] The Conservatives can make all the noise they want. They do not want to talk about the economy because it is growing, they do not want to talk about the NHS because waiting lists are falling, and they do not want to talk about immigration because they lost control of our borders and net migration is down under us by 82%. They had their chance and they blew it. We are building a stronger, fairer Britain.

Answered by
David Lammy (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 June 2026
Reference
787 c822
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business and Trade Committee
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
HC 126 2026-27
House
House of Commons

Clauses 42 to 55 agreed to. New clause 2 negatived. New clause 3 debated and negatived on division (4 to 7). New clause 4, discussed with new clause 5, debated and withdrawn. New clause 6 negatived on division (4 to 7). New clause 8 debated and negatived on division (4...

Lead member
Al Carns
Answering member
Mark Francois
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on bills
Committee
Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill
Date
16 April 2026
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on the Prime Minister's visit to the Gulf, the evolving situation in the Middle East and the implications for Britain's security.

Lead member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Lord Privy Seal
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 cc245-258
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in thanking the Government for laying this Statement, I begin by paying tribute to our brave service men and women who are serving in this conflict right now. They are the very best of Britain, and they have this House’s unequivocal support.

I remember well 16 October 1964, the...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 cc245-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is an unlawful war and has an unclear justification, with contradictory messages already from the Trump White House, State Department and Defense Department. That is how I started my response to the Statement on 2 March. I went on to say that

“the civilian death toll is likely...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 cc249-251
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I listened to both noble Lords’ speeches. We ended on one note and started on another. It was the appropriate place to end, as the noble Lord, Lord Purvis, did, on the catastrophic and heartbreaking humanitarian issues not only in Sudan, as he mentioned, but across the region,...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 cc251-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the Statement and draw attention to my interests in the Middle East and in working with conflict resolution organisations. Will the Leader of the House join me in commending, as my noble friend Lord True did, the role of Pakistan in its convening of the important...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 c253
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord. He is absolutely right that Pakistan has done a great service on this, and the role of the Prime Minister and other leaders in Pakistan must be recognised. Our Prime Minister did that and has thanked and praised them for their work in not the...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 c253
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wholeheartedly support the comments of my noble friend Lord Purvis, particularly on the West Bank. To follow up on the point made on Pakistan by the noble Lord, Lord Ahmad, since the Prime Minister’s Statement yesterday there is news now that Donald Trump is hopeful that, potentially...

Member
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 c253
House
House of Lords

We will fully co-operate with Pakistan and give it support with the valuable work that it is doing. There are different strands of discussion going on in different areas. It was probably optimistic for people to think that in one set of talks a conclusion would be reached that would...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 c254
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness for coming to the House to answer questions on the Statement on the Middle East and to the Prime Minister for his diplomatic efforts in the Gulf. From these Benches, we believe that the initiation of this conflict, the attacks by...

Member
Bishop of Southwark (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 c254
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the right reverend Prelate. Across the House, whatever views are held, there is rightly unequivocal condemnation of the Iranian regime and the actions that it has taken against its own people as well as its external actions. It is quite clear that the House is united...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 c254
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what assessment have the Government made of the impact of Hamas refusing to disarm, which was a key plank of the ceasefire agreement in Gaza? Is there not a risk of linking Lebanon to the wider ceasefire, because Lebanon has effectively been invaded by Iran in the form...

Member
Lord Austin of Dudley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 c255
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Purvis, is shouting across the Chamber. I will leave him to answer the noble Lord’s point on his views.

It is right that we condemn violence, terrorism and attacks from wherever they come. We feel that Lebanon should be part of the ceasefire. This is not a...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 c255
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does my noble friend the Leader of the House agree that we should be proud that our Prime Minister, acting in the national interest, resolutely refused to engage in this illegal war—in marked contrast to Mr Farage and Ms Badenoch?

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 April 2026
Reference
855 c255
House
House of Lords