Skip to main content

1-20 of 331 results for subject:"Legislative process"

Subject X
Electorate

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Electorate (331)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Committee had evidence from the Electoral Reform Society and from the Electoral Commission. I would ask the hon. Gentleman to reread that evidence. It has been consistently argued that the Government have no empirical, objective evidence to support their case for introducing a ban on dual candidacy. That has...

Member
Wayne David (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c111-2
House
House of Commons

If I may correct the hon. Gentleman on a point of information, that evidence was given by the Electoral Commission, not the Electoral Reform Society. I can vouch for that as a member of the Committee.

Member
Mark Williams (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c111
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that the ban on dual candidature would not change the distribution of a single seat and that the outcome of an election would be exactly the same? Gerrymandering involves one party using the system to obtain a disproportionate electoral advantage.

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c110
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c113
House
House of Commons

Why does the hon. Gentleman think that our party is likely to lose out from these proposals? I know many of our candidates in marginal seats who will be at risk if they are not allowed to stand for the list seats as well as for constituencies. Can the hon....

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c121
House
House of Commons

The amendment is about the strength or otherwise of electoral mandates. As we have been discussing all evening, the Arbuthnott report on the situation in Scotland said clearly, on the Government’s proposals:"““The Commission believes that preventing dual candidacy would be undemocratic.””" Having looked at the Welsh example, it suggested that...

Member
Alex Salmond (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c120
House
House of Commons

I meant sympathetic to what I anticipate the Minister’s position will be.

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c108
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Lady give way?

Member
Mark Tami (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c94
House
House of Commons

: Amendment No. 33 makes sense to us on purely devolutionary grounds. I accept that there were different views on whether hunting with dogs should be curtailed, but—leaving aside the position that each of us took at the time—surely anyone who feels that Wales should have parity with Scotland in...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c58
House
House of Commons

: I shall speak to amendments Nos. 39, 40 and 43. We had a debate on similar matters last week, and I do not propose to speak for long—I see the Secretary of State grinning at that. I merely restate that it is high time to consider devolving the probation...

Member
Elfyn Llwyd (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c58-9
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c66
House
House of Commons

Changing how we elect our Members of the European Parliament has not been a happy experience. From my vantage point in Welsh Labour, although I guess that this is generally true, I have noticed that individual Members of the European Parliament used to have a relationship with their constituency. They...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c77
House
House of Commons

I shall examine the matter afresh because the hon. Lady has a point. Since we are re-enacting a provision from the 1998 Act, we believed that the current provision was the right way in which to proceed, but I shall have another look at the matter.

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c83
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for reminding me. This just goes to show how many voting systems we have on our small set of islands.

Member
Cheryl Gillan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c87
House
House of Commons

Perhaps the right hon. Gentleman can explain his transformation on the road to Damascus on the subject of consultation. His party’s Government have displayed an utter and abject failure to consult on some profoundly important issues, stretching from—as one can predict—nuclear power, to reforms in the police service. Why does...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c72
House
House of Commons

Can the hon. Gentleman point to one single benefit of STV, given that it is so damaging to any constituency link between Member and voter?

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c73
House
House of Commons

Six days ago, I was stopped mid-sentence when referring to Splott market, and hon. Members may or may not recall that the purpose of my mentioning the market in Splott or any other marketplace in Wales was to try to bring to the House’s attention the fact that constitutional matters,...

Member
Lord Murphy of Torfaen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c41-2
House
House of Commons

Not all of them. The Welsh Courts Act 1942 allowed the use of Welsh in the courts, while the Welsh Language Act 1967 provided for the equal validity of anything said in Welsh or English. It conferred a kind of honorary status on the Welsh language. I have already mentioned...

Member
Hywel Williams (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c52-5
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for his response, and I take many of his points. He will accept that there is still dissatisfaction among Opposition Members, and a great deal of worry, about the consequences of the steps that the First Minister proposes to take in respect of the...

Member
Hywel Williams (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c56
House
House of Commons

Given the time pressures, I do not intend to reiterate what the hon. Member for Caernarfon (Hywel Williams) said in relation to amendments Nos. 13 and 16, which we have supported. At the very least, those are important probing amendments, to which the Secretary of State should respond. We are...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
442 c55
House
House of Commons