Skip to main content

1-20 of 528 results for subject:"Risk assessment"

Subject X
Domestic abuse

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Domestic abuse (528)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment his Department has made of the potential risk to victims of (a) domestic abuse-related offences, (b) sexual offences and (c) child sexual offences arising from the reduction of automatic release points for standard determinate sentences.

Asked by
Sarah Champion (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
18603
House
House of Commons

Amendments to clause 12 under consideration. Amendment negatived on division (5 votes to 9). Government amendments agreed to. Other amendments debated and withdrawn. Clause 12 agreed to as amended. Amendment to clause 13, discussed with new clause 9 (Reviewing compliance: duty to collaborate) debated and withdrawn. Clauses 13 and 14...

Lead member
Edward Argar
Answering member
Anna McMorrin
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Victims and Prisoners Bill Committee
Date
4 July 2023
House
House of Commons

I am repeating the following Written Ministerial Statement made today in the other place by My Noble Friend, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, the Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay:

Following commitments made in the House of Commons, HM Government has tabled a number of amendments to the Online Safety Bill....

Member
Michelle Donelan (Conservative)
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written statements
Date
19 April 2023
Reference
HCWS726
House
House of Commons

Following commitments made in the House of Commons, HM Government has tabled a number of amendments to the Online Safety Bill. These will improve the regulatory framework by strengthening protections for internet users, particularly children, reflecting the Bill’s primary objective of keeping children safe online.

Senior Management Liability

These amendments will strengthen...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written statements
Date
19 April 2023
Reference
HLWS713
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Damian Hinds
Answering member
Ellie Reeves
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
First Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
20 March 2023
House
House of Commons

I am repeating the following Written Ministerial Statement made today in the other place by my Right Honourable Friend, the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, Michelle Donelan MP:

The Online Safety Bill is a vital, world-leading piece of legislation, designed to ensure that tech companies take more...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written statements
Date
29 November 2022
Reference
HLWS385
House
House of Lords

The Online Safety Bill is a vital, world-leading piece of legislation, designed to ensure that tech companies take more responsibility for the safety of their users, particularly children. It is also vital that people can continue to express themselves freely and engage in pluralistic debate online. For that reason, I...

Member
Michelle Donelan (Conservative)
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written statements
Date
29 November 2022
Reference
HCWS397
House
House of Commons

My Lords, in response to that last comment, it is almost impossible for me not to rise to the occasion. First, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede, for setting out his case for the amendments. Of course I have listened carefully to everything in the debate, particularly...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 cc1935-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there will be correlations and differences between various orders in this context. I can certainly undertake to write to the noble Lord on this point, but I hope I can go one better: if, in addition to a letter, a conversation would be helpful, I am very happy...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 c1937
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords who have spoken to these amendments. Perhaps I may be forgiven for taking up the invitation from the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, to write to him. He is, with respect, entirely correct that there are a number of issues here. He asked specific questions...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 cc1948-1953
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, for explaining the contempt of court point in more detail and for setting out the question of the standard of proof. I will be happy to include a paragraph on that in my letter as well.

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 c1953
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay of Llandaff, for introducing this amendment and I recognise, of course, the reasons why she has tabled it. This has been a short but extremely valuable debate on a crucial part of the architecture of the law in this...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 cc1984-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb. It was not my intention to be specious. I was trying to be accurate and constructive. I have already said that I will engage with the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay, if she provides evidence that there is...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 c1987
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Ponsonby, for that point. As I said in my response to the main debate, even unaccredited centres are still subject to the various requirements that I set out, but I am very conscious of the noble Lord’s expertise in this...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 c1987
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 63 which, as the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, said, would ensure that a risk assessment is carried out. That would consider any risk to the victim which was likely to occur due to the perpetrator being given notice that a DAPO is likely...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 c1925
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede

71: Clause 32, page 20, line 21, leave out “just and convenient” and insert “practical and within five working days”

Member’s explanatory statement

This would ensure there is a maximum time (within 5 working days) in which a contested DAPO which was made without notice is brought back...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 c1931
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 71, 72 and 73. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, for putting his name to Amendment 71; I thank both him and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, for putting their names to Amendments 72 and 73.

These amendments as...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 cc1931-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will start with the point that the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, has just made about the read-across between knife crime prevention orders and DAPOs. I would certainly be very interested in attending the meeting that the noble Lord, Lord Wolfson, has just offered because the earlier point...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 cc1937-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede

80: Clause 34, page 21, line 21, at end insert “and probation or youth offending teams, as appropriate.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This would provide that evidence provided to courts includes evidence from probation or youth offending teams.

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 c1938
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendments 80, 81 and 82. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Anderson of Ipswich and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, who have also put their names to them. Amendment 80 would ensure that evidence which is provided to the courts before imposing...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 c1938
House
House of Lords