Skip to main content

1-20 of 726 results for subject:Biometrics

Subject X
Criminal records

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Criminal records (726)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what protocols are in place regarding the sharing of biometrics and criminal records data with non-EU, non-M5 partners.

Asked by
Alex Sobel (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 May 2026
Reference
1689
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary David Lammy
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Command papers
Date
18 December 2025
Reference
CP 1415
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to paragraph 53 of the UK–EU Summit – Common Understanding, published on 19 May, what discussions they have had with the European Union about improving the reciprocal exchange of biometric and criminal records data, including fingerprints, DNA and vehicle registration data.

Asked by
Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2025
Reference
HL9493
House
House of Lords

The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill would amend existing data protection legislation and introduce new provisions in areas such as digital verification services and smart data. The bill was carried over from the last session and is due to have its second reading in the House of Lords on...

Type
Lords Library Briefings - Bills
Date
13 December 2023
Reference
LLN-2023-0050

Clause 1 agreed to. Two amendments to clause 2 negatived on division (6 votes to 9 in each case). Clause 2 agreed to. Clauses 3 and 4 agreed to. Two amendments to clause 5 negatived on division (6 votes to 9 in each case). Clause 5 agreed to. Schedule 1,...

Lead member
John Whittingdale
Answering member
Stephanie Peacock
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Data Protection and Digital Information (No. 2) Bill Committee
Date
16 May 2023
House
House of Commons

Clauses 9 and 10 agreed to. Clause 11, discussed with amendments and new clause 12 (Decision subjects): two amendments negatived on division (7 votes to 10 in each case); four amendments negatived on division (6 votes to 10 in each case). Clause 11 agreed to on division (10 votes to...

Lead member
John Whittingdale
Answering member
Stephanie Peacock
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Data Protection and Digital Information (No. 2) Bill Committee
Notes
Information corrected on 23 May at 733 c1MC
Date
16 May 2023
House
House of Commons

Second reading. Agreed to on question. Programme motion on proceedings in Public Bill Committee, consideration, third reading and other proceedings. Agreed to on question. Money resolution and King's recommendation signified. Agreed to on question. Ways and means resolution. Agreed to on question. Carry-over motion. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Julia Lopez
Answering member
Lucy Powell; Stephen Kinnock; Paul Scully
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport; Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates on bills
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 cc67-103
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

Data is already the fuel driving the digital age: it powers the everyday apps that we use, public services are being improved by its better use and businesses rely on it to trade, produce goods and deliver services...

Member
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 cc67-8
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister agree that the retention and enhancement of public trust in data is a major issue, that sharing data is a major issue for the public, and that the Government must do more—perhaps she can tell us whether they intend to do more—to educate the public about how...

Member
Christine Jardine (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 c68
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for her helpful intervention. She is right: as I said earlier, trust in the system is fundamental to whether citizens have the confidence to share their data and whether we can therefore make use of that data. She made a good point about educating people,...

Member
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 c68
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend gave a long list of people who found the rules we had inherited from outside the UK challenging. She might add to that list Members of Parliament themselves. I am sure I am not alone in having been exasperated by being complained about to the Information Commissioner,...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 c68
House
House of Commons

Let me gently say that if my right hon. Friend’s constituent was going to pick on one Member of Parliament with whom to raise this point, the Member of Parliament who does not, I understand, use emails would be one of the worst candidates. However, I entirely understand Members’ frustration...

Member
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 cc68-9
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to hear the Secretary of State talk about reducing regulatory burdens without compromising the standards that we are none the less delivering—that is the central distinction, and greatly to be welcomed for its benefits for the entrepreneurialism and fleetness of foot of British industry. Does she agree,...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 c69
House
House of Commons

I am delighted, in turn, to hear my hon. Friend call me the Secretary of State—I am grateful for the promotion, even if it is not a reality. I know how passionate he feels about open data, which is a subject we have discussed before. As I said earlier, I...

Member
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 c69
House
House of Commons

Let me first draw attention to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. Let me also apologise for missing the Minister’s opening remarks—I was taken by surprise by the shortness of the preceding statement and had to rush to the Chamber.

May I take the Minister back to the...

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 cc69-70
House
House of Commons

We have been very cognisant of that risk in developing our proposals. As I said in my opening remarks, we do not wish to upset the apple cart and create a compliance headache for businesses, which would be entirely contrary to the aims of the Bill. A small business that...

Member
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Notes
Answer corrected on 27 April 2023 at 731 cc7-8MC.
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 c70
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for being so generous with her time. May I ask whether the Government intend to maintain data adequacy with the EU? I only ask because I have been contacted by some business owners who are concerned about the possible loss of EU data adequacy...

Member
Ben Lake (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 c70
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for pressing me on that important point. I know that many businesses are seeking to maintain adequacy. If we want a business-friendly regime, we do not want to create regulatory disruption for businesses, particularly those that trade with Europe and want to ensure that there...

Member
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 c70
House
House of Commons

I was concerned to hear from the British Medical Association that if the EU were to conclude that data protection legislation in the UK was inadequate, that would present a significant problem for organisations conducting medical research in the UK. Given that so many amazing medical researchers across the UK...

Member
Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 c70
House
House of Commons

I hope that my previous reply reassured the hon. Lady that we intend to maintain adequacy, and we do not consider that the Bill will present a risk in that regard. What we are trying to do, particularly in respect of medical research, is make it easier for scientists to...

Member
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2023
Reference
731 cc70-2
House
House of Commons