Skip to main content

1-20 of 223 results for subject:"Labour market"

Subject X
Credit unions

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Credit unions (223)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Just to clarify, that is not the proposal. The proposal is that the Freud pilots will apply to 20 per cent. of people on incapacity benefit. The proposals we are bringing forward for pilots with people who are new claimants will apply to 20 per cent. Everybody else will get...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c198
House
House of Commons

First, the consultation paper makes it absolutely clear:"““To fund the cost of these extra services, we are proposing that the credit offered under these arrangements could attract an interest charge of 1-2% per month””." I also say to the Secretary of State that I have read the Bill. It does...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c200
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is, I think, referring obliquely to credit unions, which do a very good job in certain parts of the country. I support the concept of credit unions, as they play an important role. For those on low incomes, there is a role for properly community-based loans...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c199-200
House
House of Commons

Perhaps the hon. Gentleman would like to tell us whether the Scottish Government are going to support this policy to help people get treatment, thus reversing his party's policy as well.

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c195
House
House of Commons

I can tell the hon. Gentleman that we have certainly not learned from the Scottish Government, whose policy is one of opposition on ethical grounds. Our ethical position is that money should not be going from the taxpayer into the pockets of drug dealers, but should be used to help...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c195
House
House of Commons

It is impossible to charge interest under this Bill. That would require further primary legislation.

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c200
House
House of Commons

Following one or two interventions that I have heard today, I wonder whether there is a danger of giving the wrong impression. There are certainly some people who claim benefit and who do not want to work; I do not dispute that for one moment. However, the large majority—I would...

Member
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c193
House
House of Commons

The system proposed in the Bill would bring in that requirement earlier—after two years—so perhaps there is not so much difference between our proposals as has been understood.

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c192
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend recognise that there is great deal of concern, particularly about people with young children who simply may not be able to carry out the kind of work-related activity proposed in the Bill? Will he confirm that everybody's personal circumstances will be taken into account because,...

Member
Baroness Clark of Kilwinning (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c194
House
House of Commons

I want to make some progress, if I may, as I do not want to strain the patience of the House. The new progression to work category will be about saying to people not that they have to work immediately but that they have to prepare for work. That will...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c192-3
House
House of Commons

That is a very good point. Indeed, the Leader of the Opposition argued recently that there were 5 million people on benefits, each of whom was a potential Karen Matthews. That is the wrong argument, because it stigmatises people, and because the vast majority of people on benefits do want...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c193-4
House
House of Commons

How does the Secretary of State square saying that the aim is to ensure that people are not distanced from the labour market with some of our constituents, who have left school, reached the age of 25 and have never worked? Surely in those circumstances, we have a duty to...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c192
House
House of Commons

Indeed; that is exactly what the provisions in the Bill would enable us to do after two years. We want to ensure that we give people work at that stage, but we would require them to take it up. I saw my right hon. Friend's proposals yesterday; I always look...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c192
House
House of Commons

I was actually making the proposal in relation to people who have never worked. Also, we do have time limits for the national insurance scheme. Even people who have paid contributions for 30 or 40 years receive benefits for only a very limited period of time.

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c192
House
House of Commons

I am happy to give that assurance. Indeed, the Gregg review covered that. Workfare is a system whereby people are punished and distanced from the labour market by removing their entitlement to work search and by their being stigmatised. We propose full-time activity, supported by looking for jobs and helping...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c192
House
House of Commons

The matter is partly about evidence and partly about the wishes of fathers. At the moment, fathers feel that it is far too complicated to register when they are not married. There are lots of examples in which fathers wanted to be involved but were unable to do so. It...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c185
House
House of Commons

As I have explained to my right hon. Friend the Member for Birkenhead (Mr. Field), we are trying to strike a balance. We think that we have struck the balance in the right place. The proposal involves working with registrars to get far more fathers registered, and registrars have plenty...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c185-6
House
House of Commons

There are questions about how much the cost will be, and we have worked with the Royal National Institute of Blind People on that. However, yes, the Bill is self-financing. We have made a number of simplifications and changes so that we can invest more in helping people. If we...

Member
James Purnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c187
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman says that plenty of jobs are available, but does he accept that many people have come out of Woolworths, for example, who are highly trained and experienced, and who will immediately jump to the front of the queue, which means that people at the back of the...

Member
John Mason (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c204
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an important point—one of many issues concerning people's civil liberties, right to privacy and right to decline treatment that they do not think is in their best interest. Those are profound matters. I have a feeling that the DWP is crashing around, with potentially disastrous consequences....

Member
Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c211
House
House of Commons