Skip to main content

1-20 of 201 results for subject:Cycleways

Subject X
Costs

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Costs (201)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Transport Committee
Date
19 April 2023
Reference
HC 163 2022-23
House
House of Commons

My Lords, with the leave of the House, I shall now repeat a Statement made in the other place by my right honourable friend the Prime Minister. The Statement is as follows:

“With permission, Mr Speaker, there are all sorts of reasons why the city in which we now sit is...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 cc2152-5
House
House of Lords

That is not the question. The question is how we can bring a transport revolution to the north sooner. Together, this revolution in both local and national transport has the potential to be truly transformative for the entire country. Yes, it is ambitious—but ambition is what we have lacked for...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2155
House
House of Lords

—in tree-dappled sunlight on their own network of fully segregated cycle lanes, as we did in London.

This Government will deliver a new anatomy of British transport—a revolution in this nation’s public transport provision and a sign to the world that, in the 21st century, this United Kingdom still has the...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2156
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that has rather spoilt my opening lines. I was of course going to thank the Minister for repeating the Statement, and also to suggest that if it were not for the conventions of the House I could congratulate her, knowing that there would be a natural instinct to...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2156
House
House of Lords

No, it is an impossible bar. Perhaps the noble Baroness would consider writing for the Spectator.

I welcome the Statement—not for what it says, which I will go through with some care—but for what it does not say, because the essence of this Statement is that it does not say “HS2...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 cc2156-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I feel sorry for the Minister, having to repeat all that. But what the Statement boasted in juvenile, rhetorical flourishes it

lacked in detail on all fronts. It reminded me of one of those exercises that teachers give primary school children to expand their vocabulary. But it lacked...

Member
Baroness Randerson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 cc2158-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have four minutes to answer as many of those questions as possible.

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2159
House
House of Lords

If the Minister consults the Companion she will see that she can extend the 20 minutes as necessary to reply fully.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2159
House
House of Lords

With the leave of the House, I will certainly do that to answer the questions as fully as I can at this stage. I was slightly disappointed that the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, felt that there

were not enough hard commitments: I felt that the Statement was full of very...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 cc2159-2161
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was Secretary of State for Transport in 1996, when we gave the go-ahead for HS1—the fast link between St Pancras and the Channel Tunnel. It was opposed by local MPs and challenged through the courts. People said it was too expensive and it was challenged on environmental...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2161
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for his question, which was not a plant. Last Friday I went on HS1 and had the honour of being in the cab. It was amazing, although they did not let me drive the train. I drove the simulator afterwards. It was striking that when...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2161
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there has been comment on the lack of detail and substance in the Statement. If a little less time had been expended on corny analogies and flowery phrases, there might

have been a bit more space for some of the core issues that need to be addressed. One...

Member
Baroness Blackstone (Labour Independent)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2161
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness will be well aware that we had an extensive debate on HS2, its speed and all the various elements. These issues have been well debated and the Government agree with the spirit of Oakervee. His report discusses speed among many other things. Indeed, there were 60 conclusions...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2162
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the problem was that the Statement was the least professional and most hyperbolic pile of nonsense from a government spokesperson—not the noble Baroness. It was an appalling abuse. It read like a Telegraph column, so we know who might have written some of it. There are two big...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2162
House
House of Lords

The Minister does not agree. I take it that the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, is not a fan of the Prime Minister, but the sort of words she uses are somewhat inappropriate. On the substance of her question about the environment and ancient woodlands, noble Lords have had the opportunity...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2162
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest, as in the register, and as a former Transport Secretary, of which there are quite a few in this House. Does my noble friend recall that over 40 years ago,

Germany developed an elaborate system of bus-type vehicles which travel by rail as well...

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2162
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for raising that issue. It is of course critical that where tracks already go into major towns or cities—some might be Beeching line closures—the opportunity for reopening those lines may not take the form of heavy rail; there are many new and innovative ways. I...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2163
House
House of Lords

My Lords, a long time ago the Government made a commitment that, before construction started on HS2, they would produce a new cost-benefit analysis and business case. That was confirmed to me in a letter from the noble Baroness, Lady Sugg, when she was Minister, on 18 December 2018. Has...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2163
House
House of Lords

Yes, the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, will be well aware that we are due a final business case, which will set out the benefits and costs for the phase. The notice to proceed will be published alongside it.

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 c2163
House
House of Lords