Skip to main content

1-20 of 618 results for subject:Biometrics

Subject X
Convictions

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Convictions (618)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many convictions were secured as a result of utilising live facial recognition in the last 12 months.

Asked by
James McMurdock (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 January 2026
Reference
99000
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people have been (a) arrested, (b) prosecuted and (c) convicted using facial recognition software.

Asked by
Navendu Mishra (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 May 2024
Reference
23609
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 30/11/2021 from Lord Sharpe of Epsom to Lord Paddick regarding questions discussed during the Committee stage (fourth day) of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill: the police taking photographs of people with convictions outside the UK, the transfer of foreign conviction information. 2p.

Deposited by
Cabinet Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
DEP2021-0959
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Priti Patel
Department
Home Office
Type
Command papers
Date
24 May 2021
Reference
CP 441
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government, during the recent Metropolitan Police trial of automated facial recognition technology, how many individuals on the system’s watchlist were correctly identified; how many alerts resulted in (1) an arrest, and (2) a subsequent conviction; and for which offences.

Asked by
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 February 2020
Reference
HL1336
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer on 16 October 2019 to Question 999 on Convictions: biometrics, if she will undertake an assessment of the accuracy of different facial composite methods and the subsequent effect on conviction rates.

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 November 2019
Reference
6353
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment her Department has made of the accuracy of different facial composite methods and the subsequent effect on conviction rates.

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 2019
Reference
999
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Theresa May
Department
Home Office
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
26 May 2016
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
1 May 2012
Reference
CHAP 9 2012

26: Schedule 8, page 171, line 21, at end insert— ““( ) is a person in relation to whom a moratorium period, under a debt relief order made under Part 7A of the Insolvency Act 1986 or Part 7A of the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 (S.I. 1989/2405 (N.I.19)), applies,””...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c66
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should like to make two brief points. The first arises from something I have noticed in the way that we run our procedures, which has changed a lot over the many years I have been here. In the old days, matters often used to be pushed at...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c17-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support my noble friend. He is absolutely right to bring back points that have not been answered by the Home Office. The purpose of Parliament in general and your Lordships' House in particular is to scrutinise legislation and ask questions—and to ask for answers to questions....

Member
Lord Marlesford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c16-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 1 is grouped on its own. As I am on my own, I will wait for the House to evacuate before I continue. The amendment follows on from the Private Member's Bill which I introduced into your Lordships' House and which was passed, which said that people...

Member
Lord Selsdon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c15-6
House
House of Lords

1: Clause 38, page 33, line 41, at end insert— ““32C Evidence gathered by non-public bodies using directed surveillance and covert human intelligence sources Public bodies shall not adopt for the purpose of a prosecution evidence of offences which attract a maximum custodial sentence of six months or less gathered...

Member
Lord Selsdon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c15
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is of enormous significance that today we are debating amendments that would create a new criminal offence of stalking. At Second Reading, I said that this Bill presented us with an opportunity to address an important loophole in our law that meant that those subject to the...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c20-3
House
House of Lords

2: Before Clause 64, insert the following new Clause— ““Protection from stalking (1) The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is amended as follows. (2) In section 2 (offence of harassment), for subsection (2) substitute— ““(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary or indictable...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c19-20
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to my noble friend for that, but, as he knows me well by now, he would obviously have expected me to have consulted the Library before speaking. The Library would like to have a hard copy because, as we know, some of the equipment in the...

Member
Lord Selsdon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c19
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will try to keep my response to the point of the original amendment moved by my noble friend Lord Selsdon, tempted although I am to proceed down routes raised by the noble Earl about procedure of the House and littering, which are matters for another occasion, but...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c18-9
House
House of Lords

32: In the Title, line 11, after first ““and”” insert ““about stalking;”” Amendment 32 agreed. Motion Moved by

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c67
House
House of Lords

30: Schedule 10, page 198, line 40, at end insert— ““( ) the Milk (Cessation of Production) Act 1985,”” 31: Schedule 10, page 201, line 14, at end insert— Amendments 30 and 31 agreed. In the Title Amendment 32 In the Title Amendment 32 Moved by

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2012
Reference
736 c67
House
House of Lords