Skip to main content

1-20 of 39 results for subject:Nottingham

Subject X
Capital investment

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Capital investment (39)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Since I was appointed on 7 July, I have been privileged to lead the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities in its work to spread opportunity in all parts of the United Kingdom.

This Statement updates the House on progress that has been made during the summer recess. All relevant...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Written statements
Date
5 September 2022
Reference
HCWS282
House
House of Commons

My Rt Hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Levelling UP, Housing and Communities (Greg Clark) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:

Since I was appointed on 7 July, I have been privileged to lead the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities in its work to spread opportunity...

Member
Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Waldrist (Conservative)
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Written statements
Date
5 September 2022
Reference
HLWS282
House
House of Lords

I rise this evening to discuss rail connectivity between the east and west midlands, specifically the connection between my city of Leicester and Nottingham and Coventry. Currently, the public transport links between Leicester and Coventry, in particular, are woefully inadequate. Leicester has a strong and proud railway history. For a...

Member
Claudia Webbe (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 c917
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend share my frustration at the delays that we constantly get from this Government? It has been almost a year since Midlands Connect developed the strategic outline business case for these improvements, but we have still not had any funding decisions. Does she agree that it is...

Member
Lilian Greenwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 c917
House
House of Commons

I do indeed. My hon. Friend makes an excellent and important point.

Will we be able to access funding via the rail enhancements pipeline as a result of the opaque mention in the integrated rail plan? The view that we should is held not just by me, but by Conservative Members...

Member
Claudia Webbe (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 cc917-8
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point about the need for fast connectivity. My constituents in Coventry North West need fast, frequent and reliable public transport in order to commute, stay connected and access vital services. It is therefore scandalous that railway journeys between Coventry and Leicester often take longer...

Member
Taiwo Owatemi (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 c918
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point. Indeed, it is hard to think of two UK cities that are as close as Coventry and Leicester yet so atrociously connected by rail. It can take up to an hour to travel less than 25 miles, and passengers have to change trains...

Member
Claudia Webbe (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 cc918-9
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Leicester East (Claudia Webbe) on securing this debate about rail connectivity between Leicester, Coventry and Nottingham. The cities of Leicester, Coventry and Nottingham lie at the heart of this country, serving as beacons of productivity and potential, and so understanding the needs of their...

Member
Wendy Morton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 cc919-920
House
House of Commons

I appreciate that our region has to compete with others, but the Minister will know that the east midlands region has the lowest level of transport rail spending in the country and has had for some time. If she is serious about levelling up, do we not have to invest...

Member
Lilian Greenwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 c920
House
House of Commons

I will come on to some of the investments we have been making, but let us not lose sight of the fact that we are investing a massive £96 billion in the midlands and the north through the integrated rail plan over the next 30 years, which is about delivering...

Member
Wendy Morton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 cc920-1
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Leicester East (Claudia Webbe) on securing the debate. Does the Minister recollect, as I do, that the press described the east midlands as the big winners of the integrated rail plan? Connecting places such as central Nottingham with central Birmingham will massively improve journey...

Member
Tom Randall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 c921
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is another passionate advocate for rail and he is absolutely right. The IRP has committed a massive £96 billion for the midlands and the north over the next 30 years, which is the biggest investment.

As I was saying, our work to electrify the midland main line represents...

Member
Wendy Morton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 cc921-2
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Claudia Webbe (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 c922
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is nodding. The pipeline approach is designed to ensure that future rail projects are properly planned and scrutinised to deliver maximum value and benefit to rail users and taxpayers, and that the portfolio is balanced and affordable. It is important that projects continue to be assessed and...

Member
Wendy Morton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 c922
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Lilian Greenwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 c922
House
House of Commons

I will continue to conclude.

I thank the hon. Member for Leicester East for securing this debate and shining a spotlight on rail connectivity between Leicester, Coventry and Nottingham. She should be assured that a lot of work is ongoing to understand the needs of the region and to plan a...

Member
Wendy Morton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 c922
House
House of Commons

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Claudia Webbe
Answering member
Wendy Morton
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
8 February 2022
Reference
708 cc917-922
House
House of Commons

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Education (Michael Gove) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. I would like to update the House on my department’s work to address the shortage in pupil places being experienced by some local authorities, and reduce the level of prescription and...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Department
Department for Education
Type
Written statements
Date
3 November 2011
Reference
731 c75-7WS
House
House of Lords

I would like to update the House on my Department's work to address the shortage in pupil places being experienced by some local authorities, and reduce the level of prescription and unnecessary guidance which are a feature of the school premises regulations and hamper the development of new schools. I...

Member
Lord Gove (Conservative)
Department
Department for Education
Type
Written statements
Date
3 November 2011
Reference
534 c39-40WS
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the social housing in the Meadows community in Nottingham.

Lead member
Lilian Greenwood
Answering member
Robert Neill
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
7 December 2010
Reference
520 c52-9WH
House
House of Commons