Skip to main content

1-20 of 174 results for subject:"Travel requirements"

Subject X
Armed forces

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Armed forces (174)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motions to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
James Brokenshire
Answering member
Lord Hanson of Flint
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fourteenth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
11 February 2015
House
House of Commons

Lords motions to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Williams of Trafford
Answering member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 cc275-282GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Williams of Trafford
Answering member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 c283GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these statutory instruments expand the cohort of immigration and nationality applicants from whom we will collect biometric information, while at the same time providing clear and consistent safeguards on the use and retention of these data. The changes in these instruments respond to consultation and engagement with the...

Member
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 cc275-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness for her explanation of the five statutory instruments that we are debating together. These instruments are relatively straightforward, and we normally support the use of biometric data. As the noble Baroness said, its use can help reduce fraud. It is also...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 cc277-280GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for her questions. I will attempt to answer some of them and will follow up the rest in writing. She made a very good point about people who are unable to provide additional evidence such as fingerprints simply because their fingerprints had faded. Every applicant...

Member
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 c280GC
House
House of Lords

I hoped that the relevant note would provide further clarification but all the noble Baroness has done is to read out the reason why I asked the question. I asked what additional proof would be required. Some people are unable to provide fingerprints for very genuine reasons, such as the...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 c280GC
House
House of Lords

I totally understand where the noble Baroness is coming from. My understanding is that if someone is unable to provide fingerprints, they will not be required to do so. However, on the point about maliciously or deliberately removing evidence of fingerprints, I hope that she will allow me to write...

Member
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 cc280-1GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness says that they can be issued with a notice and will receive a fine. Will they lose their citizenship if they never respond in any way?

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 c281GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it could end up with cancellation of leave if there was absolutely no communication or reason for not collecting the BRP document, so the answer is: possibly yes, but it depends upon the circumstances.

The noble Baroness also asked what communication has taken place with potential customers and organisations...

Member
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 cc281-2GC
House
House of Lords

My question was not about consultation on the policy but about consultation on the implementation. The Minister mentioned businesses. I was not sure whether she was trying to address the same point.

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 c282GC
House
House of Lords

I will write to the noble Baroness to clarify that.

We estimate the cost of requiring biometric enrolment for the new category of people to be about £1.8 million annually. In addition, we estimate a one-off cost for electronic deletion of biometrics of £1.3 million and a £1 million annual cost...

Member
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 c282GC
House
House of Lords

I asked questions on all the orders regarding the monitoring and review. If the Minister does not have notes on that, I am happy for her to write to me, because it is quite an important point.

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 c282GC
House
House of Lords

I will certainly write to the noble Baroness on that.

Member
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
759 c282GC
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Theresa May
Department
Home Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Notes
Replaces Instrument of the same title, laid on 17 December 2014 (UP 1019).
Date
19 January 2015
Reference
SI 2015/434
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Theresa May
Department
Home Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Notes
Withdrawn and replaced on 19 January 2015 (UP 1158).
Date
17 December 2014
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

The noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, put his finger on the problem which was created by Mr Blunkett’s abolition of appeals in immigration cases and the creation of a single tier. I am sure that when he did so—although I have not had the opportunity of checking Hansard—he said that it...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
708 c803-4
House
House of Lords

I support the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Shutt. The Government’s utterances on identity checks at the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic have been unclear. In truth, that reflects either muddled thinking by the Government or a reluctance to come clean about what they...

Member
Viscount Bridgeman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
708 c755-6
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness withdraws the amendment, may I make one remark? This is clearly a complex matter. I am a little concerned that, at this stage of the Bill, we may be making quite definite interpretations of what this clause means. This might be seen by others as setting...

Member
Earl of Listowel (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
708 c823
House
House of Lords

I, too, was surprised to find Clause 50 tucked away in the Bill so soon after the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill received Royal Assent in 2007. A key feature of the Act was that asylum and immigration cases were excluded from the operation of Section 19, so that High...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
708 c795-7
House
House of Lords