Skip to main content

1-50 of 479 results for subject:Injunctions

Subject X
Alcoholic drinks

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Alcoholic drinks (479)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
CHAP 20 2015; 2015 c. 20
Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Government bills
Date
5 June 2014
Reference
Bill 5 2014-15
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
13 March 2014
Reference
CHAP 12 2014; 2014 c. 12

The Bill proposes a range of measures in line with the Government’s aim to reduce burdens on businesses and public authorities.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
30 January 2014
Reference
RP14-6
Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Government bills
Date
23 January 2014
Reference
Bill 162 2013-14
House
House of Commons

Clauses 40 to 57 agreed to. Clause 58, discussed with new clause 8 (Requirement for review of alcohol licences where public spaces protection order is made), agreed to. Clauses 59 to 80 agreed to. Written evidence reported to the House.

Lead member
Damian Green
Answering member
Lord Hanson of Flint; Gloria De Piero
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill Committee
Date
2 July 2013
House
House of Commons
Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Department
Home Office
Type
Government bills
Date
9 May 2013
Reference
Bill 7 2013-14
House
House of Commons
Lead department / agency
Home Office
Type
Impact assessments
Date
8 May 2013
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Theresa May
Department
Home Office
Type
White papers; Command papers
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
Cm. 8495
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c34
House
House of Commons

I very much agreed with the Minister's point about the importance of cutting alcohol-related violence. Could he tell the House what the Home Office is doing to ensure greater co-operation between accident and emergency departments and local police forces to give anonymised patient data allowing police forces to do hot-spot...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c82
House
House of Commons

Local authorities, licensing authorities and the police express an interest in using a full range of powers. The hon. Member for Hornchurch criticises the work that Home Office officials and the police do, day in day out, throughout the country in the areas worst affected by alcohol-related disorder, to decide...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c84-5
House
House of Commons

I have previously described this Bill as the Christmas tree Bill to top all Christmas tree Bills, with more bits dangled off it than legislative branches to hold it all together. Indeed, with a Ways and Means resolution and an instruction motion having been required from the House even during...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c116-9
House
House of Commons

We have had an interesting debate on this important subject. The framing of today's debate with the publication of the Select Committee's report has been helpful in highlighting some of the issues, which were raised by the Chairman. It is interesting to note that the Committee did not support the...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c67-8
House
House of Commons

Can my hon. Friend imagine what the citizens of Tynemouth might think if they were told that it was unsuitable for them to make a change regarding what happens in the early hours of the morning, when they thought it desirable, because the Minister had decided that they had to...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c87
House
House of Commons

There is a distinction to be drawn between, say, detections and convictions. That is an important distinction to make. Indeed, the National Policing Improvement Agency recognised that in a previous DNA database report:""It is important to note that the availability of DNA match intelligence may not have been causal in...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c40
House
House of Commons

There is little doubt about the scope and powerful effect of DNA evidence. In many respects, the use of DNA has revolutionised policing. The ability to match tiny traces of DNA left at the scene of a crime by an offender with the DNA that is taken from a suspect...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c39-40
House
House of Commons

I have been trying to follow the hon. Gentleman's logic. He is content for DNA to be taken for up to three years for serious offences, but not for up to six years, and I cannot quite understand the logic of the difference between the two, apart from the time...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c41
House
House of Commons

Well, we shall come to the judgment on timing. I was just about to turn to retention, which is central to the debate, and the balance to be struck in terms of the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. I appreciate that the Minister and the Government take the reverse...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c41-3
House
House of Commons

I am sure the hon. Gentleman would be the first to admit that the Government have moved since Second Reading. That is because of the pressure from all sides of the House. Does he accept that we are in this situation because the Government ought to have moved quickly on...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c40
House
House of Commons

That has been highlighted by what might be described as the postcode lottery, an issue on which I know the right hon. Gentleman has focused clearly. The fact that certain police forces are prepared, in exceptional circumstances, under guidance from the Association of Chief Police Officers, to remove the profiles...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c41
House
House of Commons

May I come to that point in a second? I gave way, but I shall just finish my point about the Home Affairs Committee. I suspect that there are few Members of this House, other than those who are taking part in this debate, who will know that the Home...

Member
Tony Baldry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c59-60
House
House of Commons

It seems to me that it is crucial for the hon. Gentleman to recognise that on both sides of the House no one is against the national DNA database. The vast majority of crimes that are solved using the DNA database are those in which there is a match of...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c59
House
House of Commons

We are enjoined in both the Old and New Testaments to love justice, seek mercy and walk humbly with our God. An important part of the issue is justice and ensuring that justice is done. There is no doubt that DNA has enabled police forces across the country, through their...

Member
Tony Baldry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c58-9
House
House of Commons

I just do not believe in written constitutions or in the charter of fundamental rights. I believe in the rights of the people, but they should not be entrenched and then adjudicated, in respect of sensitive political matters, by judges who, by definition, are not elected. I had a debate...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c62
House
House of Commons

In a very fine pamphlet recently, Peter Oborne and his co-author pointed out that the European convention on human rights was drafted substantially by British lawyers and came under enormous political pressure from this House, precisely because we wanted to establish that sort of British basis throughout the continent, so...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c62
House
House of Commons

I very much agree with my right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Sleaford and North Hykeham (Mr. Hogg), my hon. Friend the Member for Banbury (Tony Baldry) and our Front-Bench team. The new clause is extremely important. Its purpose is to ensure that a limit of three years...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c61-2
House
House of Commons

I am not sure that the state's having my DNA profile would intrude on my personal activities. However, all this is otiose because I think we are of one mind on this point: whatever the Government do has to be judge-proof. The judges are against me on this, because they...

Member
Tony Baldry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c60-1
House
House of Commons

This is a fundamental issue. The hon. Gentleman says that it would not be prejudicial for all people's DNA to be on the database, but the key principle is surely that the state should not take unto itself powers to intrude on our personal activities unless there are very good...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c60
House
House of Commons

My right hon. and learned Friend, who has witnessed even more wash-ups than I have, gives some sensible advice that I am sure will have been heard by those on the Treasury Bench. Let me come back to the point that the hon. Member for Eastleigh (Chris Huhne) made. I...

Member
Tony Baldry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c60
House
House of Commons

In reality, of course, the Bill will not become law unless there is consent across all parties, because of the general election and the wash-up period. That being so, the Government would surely be well advised to consider the Select Committee's recommendations for the purposes of the wash-up.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c60
House
House of Commons

What one has to resolve is the prejudice to the individual of having their DNA on a national database. The right hon. Gentleman has spoken of the prejudice, but I am not clear what prejudice he is identifying, other than the fact that an innocent individual might object to retention....

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c47
House
House of Commons

I am delighted that we are able to have a debate of this kind on this very important subject, bearing in mind that so many concerns about the Government's DNA database proposals were expressed on Second Reading. To help the House, I should point out that today, the Select Committee...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c46-7
House
House of Commons

Of course it is a deterrent, and of course any crime scene will be searched for DNA, which will automatically go on to the database and be used as part of the investigation. We entirely support that. However, the right hon. and learned Gentleman's point is similar to a point...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c51-3
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree with the proposition that because DNA provides such an important and effective detective tool, it is also in itself a deterrent in that almost any crime involving the physical presence of a person at a scene or someone coming into contact with another person will...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c51
House
House of Commons

This whole question raises some very troubling issues. It is one about which reasonable-minded people can differ quite dramatically. There is a division of opinion. On the one hand—this is the minority view to which I subscribe—DNA is an enormously important deterrent and detective tool, and that being so there...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c56-8
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak to my Committee's report on this part of the Bill and the amendments in my name that have been tabled on behalf of that Committee. We have had extensive correspondence with my right hon. Friend the Minister and his predecessors on the retention of DNA, most...

Member
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c53-6
House
House of Commons

I am always delighted to follow the right hon. Member for Leicester, East (Keith Vaz) who, as usual, has been speaking an awful lot of good sense. I am delighted that his Committee was able to reach a unanimous view on this sensitive issue, and I hope that the Minister...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c50-1
House
House of Commons

I would not say that the right hon. and learned Gentleman was in court every day, but he is there much more often than probably every other Member of the House, bar the hon. Member for Banbury (Tony Baldry), and probably even more than all of us put together. The...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c47-50
House
House of Commons

I shall give way to the right hon. and learned Gentleman in a few moments. The increase in the database is not leading to a corresponding increase in the number of crimes solved. In fact, there has been an enormous increase in the number of profiles held on the database...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c51
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman will have an answer to his parliamentary question as quickly as possible, but we need to check the information for him to ensure that what I say in the House is correct. However, in 2008-09, 79 rape, murder or manslaughter cases were matched to the DNA database,...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c66
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c72
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is making it up as he goes along. I have told the House that I will respond to his parliamentary question in due course. When I do so, I want to ensure that I check that the information in my answer is sufficient to answer his question....

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c66-7
House
House of Commons

It is very important that the House hears what the Minister just admitted. He admitted that the information on which he has been making his case has not been checked, which is why he has been unable to answer my parliamentary question.

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c66
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to follow the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent, South (Mr. Flello), who speaks a lot of good sense on this issue. Let me first deal with amendment 23. The Government's introduction of the new power for local authorities confirms that the Government have failed to get a grip...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c81
House
House of Commons

Although alcohol misuse was discussed at some length in Committee, I feel that more time should have been devoted to an issue of such importance. I realise that this is a catch-all Bill containing many valuable provisions that require a full airing, not least those that we have discussed today...

Member
Robert Flello (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c77-80
House
House of Commons

We turn now to an area of policy and law that is very different from that of DNA retention, which we have just debated. We shall now discuss provisions to control alcohol licensing and try to address the problems resulting from late-night drinking that many of our communities experience, including...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c72-7
House
House of Commons

Does it not surprise the hon. Gentleman that the Government never held any proper consultation with local authorities in order to discover whether this was a power that they wanted? Does not one usually ask people whether they want a power before one announces that the power is to be...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c81
House
House of Commons

As ever, I am extremely grateful to my hon. Friend. He and I think almost identically on these matters, and he always adds some value to the arguments that we put forward on a mutual footing.

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c62
House
House of Commons

I noticed how my hon. Friend let go by the contention of the hon. Member for Eastleigh (Chris Huhne) that everyone was for the convention. In point of fact, it was a highly contentious matter within Attlee's Government. It was indeed drafted by British lawyers, but there was contention, and...

Member
Richard Shepherd (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c62
House
House of Commons