Skip to main content

1-20 of 543 results for subject:Redundancy

Subject X
Coronavirus job retention scheme

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Coronavirus job retention scheme (543)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

This is the final version of this paper which tracks the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the labour market from January-March 2020 to January-March 2022.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
9 August 2022
Reference
CBP-8898

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will hold urgent talks with representatives of P&O Ferries to (a) reverse its decision to dismiss 800 British workers and (b) seek the return of furlough payments made to its parent company.

Asked by
Navendu Mishra (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 March 2022
Reference
143832
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House condemns the decision of P&O Ferries to fire 800 staff without notice and demands their immediate reinstatement; notes that DP World, the owner of P&O Ferries, received millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money during the coronavirus pandemic; calls on the Government to suspend the...

Member
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c38
House
House of Commons

We stand in solidarity with the sacked P&O workers, but if one company can divest itself of its responsibility to its entire workforce and get away with it, the worry is that this will be the first domino of many. That is why we should not just show our solidarity...

Member
Andrew Gwynne (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c39
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right; that is exactly why the motion calls not only for the reinstatement of workers, but for Ministers to take action to outlaw this practice for good.

What is important is that we now know that the Government had the opportunity to stop this before it...

Member
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c39
House
House of Commons

We all stand behind the P&O workers, because it is them today and it will be other workers tomorrow if we do not act. When, for so long, the Tories have stood against regulation that protects workers’ rights, and when they have pushed against the door of fire and rehire...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c39
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Successive Tory Governments have created the conditions that allow unscrupulous employers, such as P&O, to exploit that context. It is clear that the Secretary of State has serious questions to answer.

Member
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c39
House
House of Commons

The text of the memo will be placed in the House of Commons Library. It is reported that this was received on Wednesday night and the memo was sent overnight into Thursday morning.

The Secretary of State needs to answer these questions: when exactly did he see this crucial memo and...

Member
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c40
House
House of Commons

The maritime industry, which exists in Liverpool as well as Hull, is precious and we have to fight for its future. The company paid out £270 million in dividends before taking this action. Does my hon. Friend think that the Government must now do all they can to end any...

Member
Angela Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c40
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree. The Government have significant leverage, both over P&O and over DP World, and they must use it. I will come on to the detail of that point shortly.

Member
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c40
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is being very generous with her time and is making a compelling case. The Secretary of State for Transport suggested that the review of contracts by the Government would include DP World as well as P&O

Ferries, but yesterday the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and...

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c40
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree. DP World, the parent company, must be held accountable for the actions of P&O—

Member
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c41
House
House of Commons

As I was saying, I completely agree that DP World needs to be fully responsible for the actions of P&O Ferries. The Government exercise considerable leverage over both companies.

Member
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c41
House
House of Commons

As my hon. Friend points out, it is a shame that for all the anger and the outrage expressed over the past few days, so few Conservative Members have turned up to participate in today’s debate. But it is not too late: even at this late hour, the Government must...

Member
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c41
House
House of Commons

Absolutely—and the sad fact is that these people had a collective bargaining agreement and recognition of their union, but DP World chose to trample over that in full violation of our domestic law.

The Government must take a serious look at their very long-standing relationship with DP World. This is a...

Member
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 cc41-2
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. At every available opportunity, Conservative Members have voted against potential legislation to outlaw fire and rehire.

People throughout the country will be asking how it is possible that workers can be bussed in to instantly replace those in secure jobs. Is it not the case...

Member
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 cc42-3
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for Sheffield, Heeley (Louise Haigh) for bringing this debate forward. It is important that this should be fully discussed, although we have already had an urgent statement on the subject. The way in which those 800 loyal and experienced workers were treated by P&O Ferries...

Member
Grant Shapps (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c43
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State said that he did not know of P&O’s plans until 8.30 in the evening, but the shadow Secretary of State has indicated that the Government were aware of P&O’s plans before their public announcement. Can he confirm that that is the case, when that was, who...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c43
House
House of Commons

My understanding is that a very small number of officials were contacted by P&O management during the late afternoon. They then wrote up a read-out of that, which is, I think, the note that has been widely circulated. As I have mentioned, my concern was not really sparked until I...

Member
Grant Shapps (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c44
House
House of Commons

Am I correct in understanding that the Secretary of State was made aware of the P&O workers being sacked and made the assumption that it would be done in the correct manner, without checking whether it would be done in accordance with trade union and employment legislation? We have heard...

Member
Emma Hardy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2022
Reference
711 c44
House
House of Commons