Skip to main content

1-20 of 256 results for subject:"Planning authorities"

Subject X
Infrastructure Planning Commission

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Infrastructure Planning Commission (256)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
26 November 2008
Reference
CHAP 29 2008

The Minister is being characteristically generous in giving way again. Notwithstanding PPS3 guidance, does he not acknowledge that many councils, including Castle Point, have given away far too many gardens in the dash for flats? We are seeing massive flat developments being built without any garden space at all, but...

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c529
House
House of Commons

The Minister has agreed that Members have a long track record in raising these issues. Most of us do not raise such issues for trivial reasons. There is therefore a clear indication that there is great concern about this issue. Some 21 per cent. of all new houses built in...

Member
Jacqui Lait (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c544-5
House
House of Commons

I am interested in what the Minister said about the regulations already being in place. When there are instances of garden grabbing in my constituency, Lichfield district council says that they are out of its hands. The council says that it is directed by regional policy and national policy guidance...

Member
Michael Fabricant (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c528
House
House of Commons

That is an interesting point. The problem is that some of the responsibility is devolved and some is reserved. I would argue that monopolies legislation is relevant. Why should my constituents, and literally hundreds throughout the United Kingdom, have absolutely no choice? Devolved issues include local government responsibilities, through planning...

Member
Jim Devine (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c572
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has a long-standing interest in these questions and good working links with environmental health officers. I think that I can give her those reassurances, although she would probably find it more useful if I set them out in detail, to respond to her concern in the light...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c558-61
House
House of Commons

This large group of amendments relates to parts 1 to 8 and part 12, which are concerned with the creation of a new single consent regime for nationally significant infrastructure projects. At each stage of the Bill in both Houses, that issue has been subject to detailed parliamentary debate and...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c557-8
House
House of Commons

Lords amendment No. 160 was introduced on Third Reading in another place. It would put in place a new procedure for the Lords' role in secondary legislation. As such, it would create a precedent in the constitutional relations between this House and the other place. It is not appropriate to...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c553-4
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c557
House
House of Commons

One half of the amendment puts forward proposals to define green space as being separate from other brownfield land. Would that classification not make it easier to assess the amount of development on gardens and elsewhere?

Member
Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c531
House
House of Commons

I suspect that the answers that the hon. Gentleman has received so far have not been in my name, but I shall look into whether there is an inconsistency or concern about data for the most recent year compared with those for the two previous years. Either my right hon....

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c531
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister help us with the evidence that he mentions? He will understand that, within regional and national totals, different authorities will be higher or lower than the average. In the past three years, I have tabled parliamentary questions asking for specific figures for each local authority for the...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c531
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady's question can be boiled down to asking whether our review will examine the evidence in local authority areas. Yes, of course it will. I look forward to hearing from the hon. Member for Beckenham (Mrs. Lait), because I am concerned that we too often see Tory councils...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c531-2
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for taking the positive approach of reviewing the problem. Will he consider the issues not only at national and regional level but at local level, because constituencies such as mine, where land is very valuable because houses are highly priced, are a particular target of developers?...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c531
House
House of Commons

My council has been attempting to strengthen its language under the unitary development plan. Is the Minister aware that it has been told that the language is already as strong as it could possibly be, and that if it does anything more it will be overturned by the inspectorate, and...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c529-30
House
House of Commons

I have no idea what the precise wording of the hon. Lady's local planning policy framework is, and she has not quoted it, so I cannot give her a judgment on that. However, in a moment I shall come to the question in my mind about the nature of the...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c530
House
House of Commons

On PPS3, does the Minister accept that it might be appropriate for councils to take case-by-case decisions on gardens, rather than to have blanket policies that cover the whole borough? Not every garden needs to be preserved in aspic. It might be appropriate to consider each application on its merits...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c530
House
House of Commons

The principle and practice of the planning system are that each application is considered on its merits in the context and framework of planning policies set by the planning authority. Those policies are produced within the context of guidance that we give from the centre. There is already considerable scope...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c530
House
House of Commons

We have not yet made up our minds about the terms of the review, but I will take into account what the hon. Lady has said. A number of Members are clearly very interested in this issue, and if they wish to make their own contributions to the debate, I...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c535-6
House
House of Commons

The debate about the focus of the review has centred largely on garden grabbing. Will the Minister reassure me that he will consider not just back garden development but development on green spaces as defined in the amendment, including"““land laid out as a public garden””" and"““land used for the purposes...

Member
Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c535
House
House of Commons