Skip to main content

1-20 of 965 results for subject:"House of Commons"

Subject X
Committee on Standards in Public Life

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Committee on Standards in Public Life (965)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The government has proposed further restrictions on MPs’ second jobs.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
6 August 2026
Reference
CBP-10055
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee on Standards
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
HC 247 2023-24
House
House of Commons

The Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL) published its report on MPs' expenses and allowances on 4 November. The Government are grateful to the Committee for its work and welcome the Committee's recommendations. The House has sought clarification on the question of what further legislation the Government will bring...

Member
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Written statements
Date
10 December 2009
Reference
502 c33-8WS
House
House of Commons
Date
4 November 2009
Reference
Cm 7724
House
House of Commons

Although my amendment is grouped with Amendment 21, it deals with a different point. Either we can go on with it or we can deal with it separately.

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1093
House
House of Lords

I am sorry; everyone wants to get on. If the noble Baroness can give me that assurance, despite what my noble friend said about supporting these four amendments, I would not believe it necessary to press them. However, if the effect of accepting Amendment 1 will be to leave these...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1053-4
House
House of Lords

I support the point made by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Woolf; it would be quite inappropriate for a serving judge to hold the position. I would hope that if the person appointed held or was entitled to hold high judicial office, they would be endued with a degree...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1070
House
House of Lords

There are a number of amendments to deal with in this group. The noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood, asked when IPSA will be set up. The answer is not necessarily particularly helpful, but it will be set up as soon as is practicable after Royal Assent. That does not necessarily mean...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1072-4
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the noble Lord and the noble and learned Lord, who have come riding to my rescue on this issue. Although we will reconsider the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, because of its wording, I do not take the point about...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1067
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord has made some very important points. I am not sure, strictly speaking—

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1093
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister at least accept on behalf of the Government—as the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, have suggested in support—that fairness be written in as a trigger to encourage fairness in the procedures throughout? If that is not included, it would raise...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1154
House
House of Lords

This is a simple point. I feel sure that it was an error in the drafting. They have accidentally put the Speaker below the Leader of the House of Commons. That is patently wrong, and I am trying to correct it. I beg to move.

Member
Lord Cope of Berkeley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1107
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, does not fully realise that this will not put anyone in a straitjacket. It is simply making a recommendation to the House of Commons, which it can accept or reject.

Member
Earl Ferrers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1101
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness said that the Government would bring forward amendments to address some of the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin. Could the noble Baroness say which amendments they are on the Marshalled List?

Member
Lord King of Bridgwater (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1059
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I realise that this is an unusual procedure, but with the leave of the Committee it might be helpful if I make a few comments before we debate the first group of amendments. As I said at Second Reading, Parliament and politics face a huge task in seeking...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1048-9
House
House of Lords

I hear the concerns expressed by my noble friend, who is very wise in his counsel. However, the Government are prepared to accept Amendment 2 in this slightly amended version. It is clear that the motivation for the amendments tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Shutt of Greetland, and the...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1063
House
House of Lords

Which amendment to accept is a choice for Solomon. I am grateful, as always, to the noble Lord for his advice. Let us keep with this group for the time being. I have now spoken to the various amendments.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1067
House
House of Lords

The amendment is pretty self-explanatory, but it is an opportunity to probe the Government’s reason for deciding to give another place no option to decide whether to accept the code of conduct that it is offered. It is a small point but quite an important amendment, because if another place...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1126
House
House of Lords

I am beginning to think that it may be necessary for me to ask the Committee’s permission to take Amendment 43A back to reconsider. I make no apologies for doing that because of the important matters that have been raised during the debate on this group. I am more than...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1087
House
House of Lords

I would prefer the Government to put Amendment 43A into the Bill while saying that they will consider the various points that have been raised and may produce amendments in response to them later. Then the Bill would read when reprinted and we will have a much better idea of...

Member
Lord Cope of Berkeley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1087
House
House of Lords