Skip to main content

1-20 of 323 results for subject:Injunctions

Subject X
Sex establishments

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Sex establishments (323)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The amendments are variously technical, minor and consequential, and we support them. I add my thanks to everybody who has taken part in this process over the past year. The only group that we have forgotten is the humble parliamentary researchers, including mine who did all the work earlier in...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c417-8
House
House of Commons

I admire the Minister's elegant attempt to stay on the front foot on this issue, but let us be clear: this is a retreat. The Government had wanted to grow the DNA database as a primary policy principle, but they cannot do that now. They wanted to retain profiles on...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c411-4
House
House of Commons

The amendments were supported by the Government in the other place and are the result of listening to the debates that have taken place in this House and in Committees of both Houses, including the Joint Committee on Human Rights and the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee. Over the...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c411
House
House of Commons

We have brought forward measures that were not only debated in Parliament, but subject to considerable debate outside Parliament. There has been a long consultation with the public on the measures, and over that time scale additional research has been undertaken, so we cannot be accused of seeking a blank...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c415-6
House
House of Commons

Lords amendments 40, 41 and 42 are very welcome, because they remove the Government's attempt to give themselves a blank cheque to act on such a controversial issue, whereby in light of the European ruling on DNA, they would say, "We'll go away and come up with suggestions in private....

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c414-5
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 40.

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c411
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 43.

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c416
House
House of Commons

I support Lords amendment 43, which clarifies the rules across the country. It is interesting to note that the provisions of the amendment already apply in Northern Ireland, as one of the subsequent amendments shows, and it therefore seems a sensible proposal to adopt. I thank the Minister for his...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c417
House
House of Commons

Lords amendments 43 and 45 are proposed changes to section 23 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, and the Government introduced them in another place. They were proposed as a result of late representations from the Scottish Crime and Drugs Enforcement Agency. The proposed changes are simply clarifying measures....

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c416-7
House
House of Commons

The Conservatives made it clear in Committee and on Report that we would support measures to deal with the serious problem of gang-related violence, which affects so many communities and young people up and down our country. In the past fortnight, the charity Catch22 published a survey of young people's...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c407-9
House
House of Commons

Although we welcome amendments 30 to 39 as a partial step forward in the right direction, we need to remember the background. The courts rejected the experiment in Birmingham on the grounds that other measures, such as ASBOs, could be used instead, and that there was not enough evidence from...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c409-10
House
House of Commons

Members will, I hope, welcome the fact that the amendments proposed by the Government on gang injunctions are a result of having listened to the concerns expressed in debates in another place and of new issues that were raised there. Lords amendments 30 to 33, 35 and 37 have been...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c406
House
House of Commons

I shall try to answer some of the points that have been mentioned during the debate. I welcome the welcome that the two Opposition Front Benchers gave to the steps that the Government have taken. We have said that there will be a review, that it will be held in...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c410-1
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Member for Leicester, East (Keith Vaz), the Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee, observed that it was good to see constructive engagement between Government and Opposition. Over the past year I have probably seen more give and take, with the Government listening to suggestions and adopting them,...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c403-4
House
House of Commons

By removing clause 27, I hope we are not sending out the message that the offence in question is not a serious matter. People should not assume that because we are not seeking to escalate the fine, this is not serious. The police have a range of powers and we...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c405-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 30.

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c406
House
House of Commons

I want to say something on behalf of those of us who have the honour and privilege of patrolling with the police, particularly on Friday and Saturday nights. I have been with them when they have patrolled certain areas in my constituency where orders have been made, and we have...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c404
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman's comments bring me on to the point that I was about to make. I recommend that the Minister and his colleagues also look to take more proactive action. Let me give the example of something I witnessed when on patrol in Chesterfield with Derbyshire police this summer....

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c404-5
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 25.

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c400
House
House of Commons

The Government have made a number of amendments to the alcohol provisions in response to the concerns that were expressed in both this House and in the other place. Amendment 25 removes clause 27 because the current maximum fine has never been imposed. We therefore accept that the clause is...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c400
House
House of Commons