Skip to main content

1-20 of 192 results for subject:USA

Subject X
HIV/AIDS

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I do not think it has made it any easier, but we stand by our commitment to do this by 2030. There are some things in our favour around medical advances and new treatments, and a willingness of some Governments now to play a part that perhaps they have not been able to in the past. There is no doubt that the situation is now more challenging, but we will work as firmly and with as much energy as we ever have towards this goal, because it is important that we do.

Answered by
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1328
House
House of Lords

We are concerned about HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis, malaria and other diseases. The theme of these exchanges today is going to be one of heightened concern about our ability to make the progress that we have an ambition and a responsibility to make. There is no doubt that it has now been made more difficult. The noble Lord asked about the decisions we are making here in the UK. We are not responsible for the decisions that other countries make, but we are responsible for the choices that we take. Although those decisions are currently being made, I find it difficult to envisage a situation where the United Kingdom does not play a leading role in the fight against these diseases.

Answered by
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1329
House
House of Lords

Absolutely not. Why would we do that? It is our ambition to regain the 0.7% spend on official development assistance. We have been very clear about that. Why would we repeal that legislation? I find it very difficult that we are spending so much money on housing asylum seekers and migrants in the UK out of our ODA budget. I do not think that is what we should be doing. The previous Government completely lost control of the borders of this country and we have inherited this situation. The Home Office is working hard to get the numbers down and to reduce the spend so that money can be spent where it is needed most. We did make the decision—and it was a difficult one for this Government—to prioritise spending on defence. I do not think I need to explain to noble Lords why we did that. It is a decision I support, and I will be working incredibly hard, with allies and partners, to make sure that the money that we do have is spent wisely, and that we get the best value for money for British taxpayers and the most impact that we can for our partners overseas.

Answered by
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1329
House
House of Lords

I completely agree. There are encouraging things happening around some of the medical devices and the drugs that can be used now to provide protection against HIV, including devices for which women are in control of their use, because we are seeing an increase in prevalence among women and young girls. There are encouraging things happening, but it would be incredible to stand here and say that the situation that we now find ourselves in is not far more challenging than it has been more recently.

Answered by
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1330
House
House of Lords

It is vital that we do that, and we are doing that. I met the executive director of the WHO earlier this week, and that is something we spoke about in some depth. The noble Earl is absolutely right to encourage the Government to take that approach, and we will be doing so.

Answered by
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1330
House
House of Lords

There is no doubt that research and development is critical to making progress on this and many other agendas in development. We are working through the impact, as the noble Baroness suggests we should. Clearly, we cannot fill the void, but we can work smarter and more collaboratively, and certainly with our university and research partners it is important that we do so.

Answered by
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1330
House
House of Lords

We are working through the impact of the United States’ decision and looking at how we reprioritise our own spending. The noble Lord is absolutely right. Encouragingly, in 2023, approximately 86% of people living with HIV worldwide knew their HIV status. What we do not want to see is that incredible achievement going in the wrong direction. He is right to remind the House of that.

Answered by
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1330
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the United States of America’s withdrawal from the World Health Organization on the global treatment of HIV/AIDS.

Asked by
Lord Fowler (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc1328-1330
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I pay tribute to the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, for the work that he has done on this agenda over very many decades. The UK will continue to work with the World Health Organization, member states and other partners to support the WHO’s ongoing transformation and to strengthen its efficiency, transparency and responsiveness. We are proud of our long-standing support for global health organisations at the core of the response to HIV/AIDS and we continue to support efforts to end AIDS as a public health threat by 2030.

Answered by
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1328
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for that reply. There have been, to date, 40 million deaths from AIDS across the world. Because of the success of efforts over the last years, official predictions were that AIDS could be eliminated as a public health disease by 2030, as the Minister has just said, but that was before the abrupt and recent changes of policy by the American Administration, which have caused havoc across the world. Is it really the Government’s view that the 2030 target is achievable in the new conditions? Do they share the view of most medical experts that the American policies are leading the world backwards, to defeat, in a vital area of public health?

Asked by
Lord Fowler (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1328
House
House of Lords

My Lords, tuberculosis is the single biggest cause of death for people with HIV/AIDS, killing 1.25 million people a year. It is the most deadly infectious disease of all. Given the reduction of funding and the dismantling of USAID, and the withdrawal of funding from the WHO, does the Minister share my concern that our ability to conduct ongoing surveillance of this airborne transmissible disease is at risk? Will the Government maintain their programmes to ensure that this disease too can be beaten by 2030?

Asked by
Lord Herbert of South Downs (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1328
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with regard to our approach, this week marks the 10th anniversary of the 0.7% legislation passing this House. I mourn that, because I was naive; I felt that subsequent Governments would honour it. However, we now have the position where the Government will be paying more to private sector landlords in the UK than the entirety of all our support for children with malaria or those born with AIDS. In two years’ time, we will be spending the same level on official development assistance as Viktor Orbán’s Hungary. With all great seriousness, given how far away we will be from that legislation—and the more incredulous government statements saying that when fiscal circumstances arise we will get to it—as the people now in charge of that legislation, will the Government now do the decent thing and repeal it?

Asked by
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1329
House
House of Lords

My Lords, last week, I co-hosted on behalf of the parliamentary Science and Technology Committee a meeting of STOPAIDS in this House. We heard from people from Africa whose ability to access drugs had, in one case, enabled a woman to live to become a grandmother. We heard about the devastating effect, mentioned by the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, of the cuts in USAID, for which we are not responsible. I hope my noble friend the Minister will understand that, to the extent that Britain can continue to play its part in trying to reach the 2030 target, it must use the resources, scarce though

they are, to enable this work to continue. We cannot allow the world to go backwards. This needs to be tackled now.

Asked by
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1329
House
House of Lords

My Lords, taking into account the withdrawal of the United States from the WHO, can the Minister inform the House how we are working with other international partners to fill that void?

Asked by
Earl of Courtown (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1330
House
House of Lords

My Lords, alongside the withdrawal from the World Health Organization, the Trump Administration are cutting billions of dollars from US universities and research institutes. What assessment have the Government made of the impact on the UK’s research partnerships, and, crucially, in relation to this question, the impact on our shared global health challenges?

Asked by
Baroness Bull (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1330
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister seems to suggest that devices and medication are expanding. The problem is that people need to get tested. The impact of the US pulling out is that there are 228,000 fewer tests a day and the supply of things such as condoms and PrEP has ceased in certain programmes. If the Minister wishes the UK to take a lead, as she said at the Dispatch Box, what extra support and resources will be made available if this temporary suspension becomes permanent?

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 c1330
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what steps his Department plans to take to ensure the continuity of treatment and prevention services for global HIV/AIDS programs, in the context of the recent US State Department decision to halt nearly all existing foreign assistance funding.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2025
Reference
26801
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what assessment he has made of the potential implications for his sub-Saharan Africa aid policies of the US State Department's decision to halt nearly all foreign assistance funding; and whether the Government plans to take steps to replace...

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2025
Reference
26800
House
House of Commons

Lords committee stage second day. Clause 5 agreed to. Schedule 1 agreed to. Clause 6, as amended, agreed to. Schedule 2 agreed to. Clauses 7 to 13 agreed to. Clause 14 under consideration.

Lead member
Viscount Camrose
Answering member
Lord Bassam of Brighton; Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Notes
Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland legislative consent sought.
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 cc97-158GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

11: Clause 5, page 6, line 15, at end insert—

“(za) After point (a) insert—

“(aa) the data subject has given consent for his or her personal data to enter the public domain via a public body;

(ab) processing is carried out by a public body pursuant to a legal or...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 c97GC
House
House of Lords