Skip to main content

1-14 of 14 results for subject:Misuse

Session X
2022-23
Subject X
Salford

Type

House

Session

2022-23 (14)

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Salford (14)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to take note. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede
Answering member
Lord Bellamy
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc37-48GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these regulations introduce pilots of an intensive oversight system for certain less serious offenders. The Explanatory Memorandum states that,

“this legislation is expected to: improve judicial confidence in the sentencing system, increase offender compliance, reduce reoffending and reduce the use of custody”.

The regulations will come into force on Monday...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc37-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak briefly on this statutory instrument. I have always taken an interest in the criminal justice system and have taken the view that, if you are to impose relatively draconian sentences on some prisoners, you should at least also give them an opportunity for redemption and...

Member
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc38-40GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede, for initiating this debate. I welcome his contribution and that of the

noble Lord, Lord Jackson. I am not a million miles from either of their views either, but I emphasise that I value the progress that...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc40-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am extremely grateful to all noble Lords who have contributed to this debate in such a constructive and thoughtful way. I am particularly grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Ponsonby, whose Motion gave rise to it.

First, I will briefly address the concerns raised, notably by the noble...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc42-4GC
House
House of Lords

Will my noble and learned friend the Minister put on record the continuing support and importance of chaplaincy—both potentially in these schemes and in the wider prison estate—which, to my mind, is an integral part of supporting prisoners as they move away from crime and take their place in society?

Member
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 c44GC
House
House of Lords

I am very happy to give my noble friend Lord Jackson that assurance. The Ministry of Justice and the Government share his view that effective chaplaincy is very important and part of the wider holistic approach to dealing with offenders.

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 c44GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was explaining the work with local multiagency teams to make sure that we are delivering a model and a system that will work with a ring-fenced probation resource and a judiciary that will engage in intensive supervision and provide the continuity that has been lacking so far....

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc44-5GC
House
House of Lords

Will the Ministry of Justice be marking its own homework, or will we have some kind of independent basis for the evaluation?

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 c45GC
House
House of Lords

At the moment, the evaluation is an MoJ evaluation, as far as I know. I am sure that we can build in stakeholders. This is not exactly the MoJ’s homework, because the MoJ is not active in doing this; it is judges, the Probation Service, local authorities and so forth....

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 c45GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in further answer to a question asked by the noble Lord, Lord Beith, I understand that we will be engaging external contractors to support the evaluation of these proposals. So there will be some element of external verification, but I expect your Lordships’ House—indeed, both Houses—to take a...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc45-6GC
House
House of Lords

Before the noble and learned Lord sits down, can he explain why two Crown Courts and one magistrates’ court were chosen? The magistrates’ court is for women offenders. Of course, the vast bulk of low-level drug offences are seen in magistrates’ courts, not Crown Courts, so I would be interested...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 c46GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not sure that I am able to give the noble Lord, Lord Ponsonby, a comprehensive answer to his first question as to why we did not do more in magistrates’ courts. We certainly wanted, in terms of the Crown Court, to see to what extent we...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc47-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everybody who has taken part in this brief debate. I look forward to discussing this issue further as the pilots evolve and I commend my Motion to the Committee.

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 c48GC
House
House of Lords