Skip to main content

1-20 of 147 results for subject:Defence

Session X
2015-16
Subject X
Standards

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Standards (147)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
12 April 2016
Reference
HC 494 2015-16
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
12 April 2016
Reference
HC 494 2015-16
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
2 February 2016
Reference
HC 494 2015-16
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
1 December 2015
Reference
HC 494 2015-16
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
17 November 2015
Reference
HC 494 2015-16
House
House of Commons

No, frankly, I do not think we are. That comes back to the fact that this is not a target that we have to hit precisely. This is a minimum—in my opinion and from my point of view, an inadequate minimum. It is much easier to land the helicopter on...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 cc1280-2
House
House of Commons

Do I therefore understand that when the SDSR comes out, we will know for certain that there will be no reduction from the total of 13 Type 26s?

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1310
House
House of Commons

I was not intending to intervene, but I cannot resist an invitation like that. This was an outstandingly good event. I am hoping that it may be possible to bring the same presentation—not only the cockpit simulation of the Lightning II, but the presentations by the representatives of many of...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1311
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for giving way, especially as I know how keen he is to get through the rest of his comments rapidly. However, I think his argument is the reverse of the truth. The difficulty with putting into law something that was a target that we...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1326
House
House of Commons

I am very sorry that the Minister doubts the account that I gave him in my contribution to the debate earlier, when I said that by asking the Prime Minister whether we would always meet the 2% as long

as he was in office, I was not casting doubt at...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1326
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1267
House
House of Commons

Chocks away!

Member
Bob Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1267
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend from the Army for reminding the House of my interest and experience in aviation.

I am genuinely delighted to open this important debate on defence spending and to introduce my Bill to give legal effect to the Government’s welcome commitment to meet the NATO target of...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 cc1267-8
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making an effective case for adequate and proper defence spending, but as he and I are both against unnecessary red tape I hope that during his remarks he will deal with why he feels we should have the straitjacket of legislation in this area.

Member
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1268
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend and of course I shall come on to that. As I explained at the outset, in order to explain why I believe this Bill is so important, it is critical to set out the international scene as I see it, for defence...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1268
House
House of Commons

On my hon. Friend’s comment about China and cyber-warfare, I am sure he knows as well as I do

that China has a dedicated cyber-warfare division, which it exercises—it last did so, as far as I know, three years ago—and practises attacks against the west.

Member
Bob Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1268
House
House of Commons

Indeed. My hon. and gallant Friend has come to my support, for I was about to say that it was our recognition of the significance of cyber-security that led us, when my right hon. Friend the Member for North Somerset (Dr Fox) was Secretary of State—I am sure he is...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1269
House
House of Commons

It so happens that last weekend I was stopped in the street by a constituent who works at Roke Manor, who told me that this is a really serious problem. She raised it in the context of the Chinese visit.

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1269
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for two reasons—first, he reinforces my argument, and, secondly, he puts on the record an institution of phenomenal value to this country, Roke Manor Research, formerly owned by a German company and now very much in British hands. As I am sure the...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1269
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on introducing this Bill for discussion in the House today. Does he agree that the situation is even more alarming when we look at the size of Chinese defence spending, which was recently announced to be $144.2 billion—a 10% year-on-year increase, approximately?

Member
Cheryl Gillan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
600 c1269
House
House of Commons