Skip to main content

1-20 of 113 results for subject:"Fixed penalties"

Session X
2013-14

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister with reference to the answer of 8 November 2011, Official Report, column 283W, on the electoral register, if he will make it his policy to collect information on the number of fixed penalty notices issued for non-registration in the run up to the introduction...

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 May 2014
Reference
198442; 580 c586W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister when electoral registration officers will be able to impose fixed penalty notices for non-registration.

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 May 2014
Reference
198456; 580 c586W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what training has been given to electoral registration officers in the implementation of fixed penalty notices for non-registration.

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 May 2014
Reference
198457; 580 c586W
House
House of Commons

Moved by

Baroness Smith of Basildon

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 c1702
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for his explanation. I shall explain why we have brought this amendment before the House today.

It is around six weeks since we discussed this issue in Grand Committee. I thank the noble Lord for asking to meet me prior to this debate...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 cc1702-5
House
House of Lords

The Minister has given helpful figures, but can he give comparative figures on how the situation has changed over time? The premise is that if seizures of illegal imports are up, they must be up against another figure. I made this point in Committee; we had figures but not comparative...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 c1711
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as on many other occasions, I am grateful to the Minister for the time and care he takes in responding to issues raised in debate. I hope he understands that the only contributions made in your Lordships’ House today have expressed concerns about the Government’s actions regarding the...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 c1713
House
House of Lords

That is helpful, and I look forward to receiving more information. The point is that the measures must be in place and understood prior to the implementation of any ban. My greatest disappointment is that the Minister has failed to commit to a review. For us, that is crucial. At...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 c1715
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Taylor of Holbeach

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 c1701
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government seek to control khat as a class C drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, to protect the public from the potential harms associated with this drug and the threat posed from its international trafficking.

Through the second draft order laid by the Ministry of Justice,...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 c1702
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have difficulties with both the substance of the order and the amendment. It seems that we may be in a world of policy-based evidence and an amendment that is being brought to the House because the Opposition are looking for something to object to without objecting to...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 cc1705-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment to the decision of Home Secretary to ban khat under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, although I identify with the comments of the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, in relation to the amendment. There are very good reasons to oppose this ban. I make...

Member
Baroness Meacher (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 cc1707-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, of course, in focusing on a topic such as this, almost everything that could be said has been. My noble friend already included four reasons in her amendment for not going ahead with the reclassification of khat. All four reasons were covered fairly fully by other speakers. There...

Member
Lord Rea (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 cc1709-1710
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome this further opportunity to set out the Government’s approach, which allows me to focus, in particular, on the activities to support the successful implementation of the ban on khat. That has lain at the heart of concerns raised by noble Lords, which I take seriously. I...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 cc1710-1
House
House of Lords

I do not have those figures to hand. I think the noble Baroness will understand that, if this material is arriving here to be distributed to other countries, as I have illustrated, it confirms the view that this country is serving as a distribution hub in a way that would...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 cc1711-2
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister accept that the whole point about khat is that the ACMD did look at the potential medical and social harms and concluded that they did not justify a ban? The supply-side issues, which Professor Iverson accepts may be slightly beyond the council’s remit, are separate. My point...

Member
Baroness Meacher (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 c1712
House
House of Lords

I cannot accept that. When I spoke to the noble Baroness earlier, I said that I did not think I would be able to give her much comfort. We did not reject the ACMD’s report. As I explained, the ACMD is there to advise on particular aspects but, in the...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 cc1712-4
House
House of Lords

I am sure the noble Baroness will admit that this is not the sole intervention that the Government are making but is part and parcel of a package of health and community activities that the Government have commissioned. Public Health England is and will be very active in pursing this...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 c1713
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Amendment moved as a motion of regret, disagreed to on division (125 to 216). Main question agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach
Answering member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 cc1701-1715
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Amendment moved as a motion of regret, disagreed to on division (125 to 216). Main question agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach
Answering member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
12 May 2014
Reference
753 c1715
House
House of Lords