Skip to main content

1-20 of 79 results for subject:Uprating

Session X
2013-14
Subject X
Consumer prices index

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Consumer prices index (79)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motions to consider agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Bates
Answering member
Baroness Sherlock
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 cc480-492GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2014 and the Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2014 were laid before the House on 27 January 2014 and I am satisfied that they are compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

I start by touching briefly on the Guaranteed Minimum Pensions...

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 cc481-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a number of questions. First, I welcome the triple lock. This is the first time that we have seen prices as the lock that has come into play, which means that pensioners will always benefit from the best of the three options. This is the first...

Member
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 cc482-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am pleased to follow my noble friend Lord German, who asked some pertinent questions. I want to take a slightly different approach and put these uprating orders into the context of a longer timescale. As I think we all know, changes to upratings will generate more savings...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 cc483-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his explanation of the orders, and the noble Lords, Lord German and Lord Kirkwood, for

their contributions. I would like to add myself to the circulation list for this exciting reply to the questions of the noble Lord, Lord German. Is the Minister...

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 cc486-8GC
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for their questions. All Members who have spoken are renowned experts in the field. Until a few months ago, I was joining from the Back Benches in scrutiny of such orders, so I sense the expertise that lies behind the pertinent questions which have been asked....

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 c488GC
House
House of Lords

And the Conservative Benches: are they packed?

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 c489GC
House
House of Lords

Of course I should not have mentioned that.

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 c489GC
House
House of Lords

We were playing so nicely.

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 c489GC
House
House of Lords

We are a coalition—we share the point. The point is that I think that there is a genuine cross-party support. For example, the triple lock on pensions is welcome, it is working and it is delivering real-terms increases to pensioners.

If I may, I will go through the points raised in...

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 cc489-491GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the Minister for explaining the process and what happens to the different benefits, but I am still chewing over the information that neither the childcare allowances nor the work allowances in universal credit will be increased at all and are therefore facing a...

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 cc491-2GC
House
House of Lords

I appreciate the point which the noble Baroness has made and I was not suggesting that everybody would be better off under this provision. The question is one of removing perceived barriers to go back into work—to encourage people to move seamlessly off benefits and into work—without creating disincentives. That...

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2014
Reference
752 c492GC
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2014
Reference
576 c179
House
House of Commons

In a second.

That explains the reference at the end of my speech to an above-inflation increase although, as we have discussed, there will be years in which the trend goes in the opposite direction.

Member
Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2014
Reference
576 c179
House
House of Commons

The Minister anticipates the point I was about to make. The situation to which he refers could apply in any year. People suffered greatly in previous years because the uprating was set at a low point for inflation, yet they experienced real rising prices, so the increase is hardly a...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2014
Reference
576 c179
House
House of Commons

It is interesting to look at what has happened to benefit rates over the long run. In the seven years since the 2008 crash, the rate of jobseeker’s allowance has increased by more than the growth in earnings. While people with jobs—people would obviously far rather have jobs than not—have...

Member
Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2014
Reference
576 c179
House
House of Commons

What is the Minister’s response to last week’s comments by the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster about the significant number of people who find themselves in destitution as a result of the changes that have been made?

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2014
Reference
576 c179
House
House of Commons

I have great respect for the Cardinal Archbishop, who I met some years ago, and I do not doubt his compassion for those in need, which is shared by Members on both sides of the House. However, I do not think that anyone believes that people were not in severe...

Member
Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2014
Reference
576 c179
House
House of Commons

Surely the Minister accepts that comments such as those made by the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster and in last week’s letter signed by 27 bishops are based on actual experience of what is happening in communities. Surely he cannot maintain, as he appeared to do, that nothing has changed and...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2014
Reference
576 c180
House
House of Commons

No one is suggesting that nothing has changed. The global economic downturn was far deeper than was originally thought, and we have had to recover from that. We had to make changes to the benefits system to try to balance the books, which the previous Government failed to do.

The hon....

Member
Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2014
Reference
576 c180
House
House of Commons