Skip to main content

1-20 of 329 results for subject:"General practitioners"

Session X
2012-13

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
HC 1105-i 2012-13
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average age is of general practitioners in the NHS.

[151232]

Asked by
Nicholas Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
151232; 561 c741W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans his Department has to make salaried and partnership working more attractive to recently qualified GPs than locum employment or emigration.

[150118]

Asked by
Caroline Dinenage (Conservative)
Answering body
Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
150118; 561 cc337-8W
House
House of Commons

A year ago, GPs in Hackney bid to run the out-of-hours services. Earlier this year, they were told that it had to be tendered because the board was fearful of legal challenge from private health companies. Who is running the NHS—the Secretary of State or the private health company lawyers?

Asked by
Meg Hillier (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department of Health
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 c165
House
House of Commons

That is an absolutely extraordinary question given that it was the previous Labour Government’s decision to contract out out-of-hours services in the first place, which has led to the massive pressure on so many A and Es. The regulations in place for many of these arrangements were laid by the previous Labour Government.

Answered by
Dan Poulter (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 c166
House
House of Commons

Under the previous Government, my constituents could get an appointment with their GP within 48 hours. I recently heard of a wait for a routine appointment taking three weeks. Is not this one of the reasons there is such pressure on A and Es, and will the Secretary of State reintroduce the 48-hour appointment?

Asked by
Meg Munn (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department of Health
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 c166
House
House of Commons

The reason there is so much pressure on A and Es is the disastrous GP contract negotiated by the hon. Lady’s party in government, since when—I do not know whether she was listening to what I said earlier—an additional 4 million people every year are going to our A and Es. That is what is causing the huge pressure, and that is what we are determined to put right.

Answered by
Jeremy Hunt (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 c166
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their estimate of the revenue that would be raised by the imposition of a £15 fee for a visit to a general practitioner, assuming the same exemptions from the charge as for prescription charges.[HL6502]

Asked by
Lord Warner (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 April 2013
Reference
744 c318WA; HL6502
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what residence qualifications are required, and whether the possession of a National Insurance number is needed, for registration as a patient with an NHS general practitioner.[HL6646]

Asked by
Lord Marlesford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 April 2013
Reference
744 c322WA; HL6646
House
House of Lords

My Lords, people are entitled to expect high-quality health services at any time of day or night. All out-of-hours services must be delivered according to national quality requirements, and local providers have a legal requirement to make sure that high-quality out-of-hours care is in place. If this is not happening, we expect action to be taken immediately to improve services.

Answered by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c963
House
House of Lords

The publication of the Patients Association survey and the comments from the BMA highlight that many GP practices are struggling to cope with a rising workload as resources are falling. Does the Minister agree that, with many other changes taking place across government on 1 April, we are in a dangerous and worrying period for people who find themselves in need of health and related services?

Asked by
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c963
House
House of Lords

My Lords, of course, the results from the Patients Association report are a matter for concern. We are absolutely committed to improving access to GPs and, from 1 April, responsibility for making sure that that happens will pass to the NHS Commissioning Board. We have outlined a clear set of objectives around patients’ experience of local primary care services in the mandate to the board; we have launched marketing campaigns in each of the new NHS 111 areas, which we are confident will facilitate better access to out-of-hours care; and we will publish information regularly, so that patients can see how their practice is performing and feed back to their practice when it is not performing.

Answered by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c964
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at a time when nurses are being urged to wash their patients, is it not time that the GP contract was renegotiated so that GPs can be responsible for the out-of-hours care of their patients and, in doing so, perhaps relieve the pressure on our A&E departments?

Asked by
Lord Ribeiro (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c964
House
House of Lords

Increasingly, this is likely to happen, because our changes to the GP contract this year are bound to make sure that GPs think more about long-term integrated care for their patients. The recommendations from NICE underpinned the new arrangements in the GP contract, and my noble friend is absolutely right that that has to remain very squarely in the sights of all GPs.

Answered by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c964
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I refer noble Lords to my health interests in the register. The Minister mentioned the NHS 111 service. Is he aware of reports up and down the country of a shortage of staff and long waiting times to get through to the service? Is he also aware that the system is increasing pressure to close walk-in centres? Combined with a poor-quality out-of-hours service, is it any wonder that acute hospitals are under such pressure? Will the Government look at this again?

Asked by
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c964
House
House of Lords

I am aware of teething problems in two particular areas of the country, but we know from the pilots of NHS 111 that there is a high rate of patient satisfaction with the service. As noble Lords will know, NHS 111 is designed to put the caller through to the right service first time around, whether it is a nurse, a doctor or an ambulance, if that is required. There are bound to be teething problems, and rolling out a service like this across the country is, of course, a major task. But the concept of increased flexible access to healthcare and advice is absolutely right, and we are determined to see the service work very well for everybody.

Answered by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c964
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in his Answer to the original Question, the Minister said that action would be taken if the service failed. Who will actually take the action under the new system once the Act becomes actionable next weekend?

Asked by
Baroness Emerton (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c964
House
House of Lords

Clinical commissioning groups are responsible for commissioning out-of-hours care and, of course, the CQC will be responsible for the first time for registering GP practices.

Answered by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c964
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in some parts of the country confidence has been lost in out-of-hours services. The NHS Commissioning Board takes over next week, so what can it do in terms of commissioning smartly to regain the public’s confidence in these services?

Asked by
Baroness Jolly (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c965
House
House of Lords

We have known that out-of-hours care has been in need of reform for some considerable time. The much strengthened commissioning arrangements that we have put in place, including the national quality requirements that I mentioned earlier, will enable that to happen.

Answered by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c965
House
House of Lords